Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to Logistics Management
RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email

2009 Quest for Quality Awards: TRUCKLOAD: Truckload method actors

By Logistics Management Staff -- Logistics Management, 8/1/2009

As our senior trucking correspondent John Schulz deftly surmised last month in our 2009 Annual Report, the truckload (TL) sector has always been cast as the engine driving innovation in the trucking industry. But, today, it’s playing the part of a shrinking giant.

In fact, TL carriers reduced capacity by an estimated 7 percent last year as the segment coped with a serious recession that has caused double-digit drops in tonnage demand. And while accounting for 87 percent of all for-hire trucking revenue, the non-union TL sector has proven to be an nimble provider whose strength has been in the ability to align capacity and resources where shippers need them to be. So, when the current trucking downturn began in August 2006, the TL sector reacted by shedding capacity and parking trucks at what normally would be considered an alarming rate.

Due to declining rates, some leading TL carriers have diversified away from their typecast roles in pure dry van freight into other transport segments.

According to the readers of LM, 29 carriers have taken to their more diversified roles nicely, meeting high service levels while juggling more demands.

In Industrial & Heavy-Haul we find Mullen Trucking leading our pack of winners for the second year in a row, posting a 37.92 weighted score. Mullen led the way in On-time Performance (12.60) and Equipment & Operations (6.60), while Landstar Carrier Group scored the highest in Value (10.17). Pacer Transport scored highest in Information Technology (3.58) and Customer Service (8.40).

Only four carriers will walk the red carpet this year in the Dry Freight carrier category, down from the seven winners we honored in 2008. Landstar Carrier Group’s performance over the past year earned the carrier top honors with a 34.78 weighted score. Landstar won three of the five attribute categories, scoring 8.92 in Value, 6.58 in Customer Service, and 5.31 in Equipment & Operations. Con-way Truckload was second in overall scoring (34.49), putting up a category-leading 3.43 in Information Technology. Heartland Express led the way in On-time Performance this year, scoring an impressive 11.00.

This year we have 10 carriers in the ever-competitive Expedited Motor Carriers’ category. FedEx Custom Critical rings in with the top weighted average for the third year in a row (36.92), but not by much. In fact, the top four winners are separated by only a few tenths of a point. FedEx Custom put a category-leading 12.40 in On-time Performance this year, and also led the way in Information Technology (3.93), Customer Service (7.11), and Equipment & Operations (5.84). Averitt Express (36.90), CRST Van Expedited (36.59), and NEMF Today (36.22) rounded out this year’s top four in one of the more hotly contested battles.

This year’s Bulk Motor Carriers category has seven carriers walking the red carpet. While Bulkmatic Transport put up the top overall score (35.40), top honors in each attribute category were spread around fairly well this year. Bulkmatic took top spot in Customer Service (7.11), while Groendyke Transport put up the best score in On-time Performance (11.25) and Value (9.33), and Miller Transporters placed best in Information Technology (3.40) and Equipment & Operations (5.43).

On-time Performance Value Information Technology Customer Service Equipment & Operations Weighted Score
Logistics Management - 2009 Quest for Quality -Truckload and Van Lines - Reed Business Information - June 2009
Mullen Trucking 12.60 9.60 2.40 6.72 6.60 37.92
Landstar Carrier Group 11.53 10.17 3.43 6.75 5.55 37.43
Melton Truck Lines 11.52 9.28 3.46 6.77 5.37 36.39
Pacer Transport 9.35 9.54 3.58 8.40 4.91 35.77
AVERAGE 11.08 9.07 3.29 6.33 5.24 35.01


On-time Performance Value Information Technology Customer Service Equipment & Operations Weighted Score
Logistics Management - 2009 Quest for Quality - Truckload and Van Lines - Reed Business Information - June 2009
Landstar Carrier Group 10.76 8.92 3.22 6.58 5.31 34.78
Con-way Truckload 10.59 8.82 3.43 6.42 5.23 34.49
Heartland Express 11.00 8.08 3.12 6.37 5.22 33.78
Schneider National 10.24 8.90 3.38 6.01 5.12 33.64
AVERAGE 10.16 8.53 3.18 6.11 5.06 33.03


On-time Performance Value Information Technology Customer Service Equipment & Operations Weighted Score
All scores are weighted. Weighted scores are determined by multiplying the average raw scores by the average importance of each attribute (1= least important; 5= most important). To find the attributed weights for this category, see the introduction to the Quest for Quality report.
Logistics Management - 2009 Quest for Quality - Truckload and Van Lines - Reed Business Information - June 2009
FedEx Custom Critical 12.40 7.64 3.93 7.11 5.84 36.92
Averitt Express 11.20 9.48 3.60 7.00 5.62 36.90
CRST Van Expedited 12.15 9.00 3.56 6.65 5.23 36.59
NEMF Today 11.37 10.11 2.92 6.84 4.98 36.22
Pitt Ohio Express 11.35 9.30 3.45 6.56 5.20 35.86
USF Holland 11.08 9.52 3.51 6.53 5.21 35.85
UPS 11.19 8.85 3.82 6.24 5.49 35.60
Landstar Express America 10.98 8.92 3.63 6.78 5.10 35.42
ABF Freight System 10.85 8.61 3.51 6.72 5.29 34.98
New Penn 11.14 9.27 3.20 6.36 4.90 34.88
AVERAGE 10.82 8.75 3.51 6.42 5.23 34.72


On-time Performance Value Information Technology Customer Service Equipment & Operations Weighted Score
Logistics Management - 2009 Quest for Quality - Truckload and Van Lines - Reed Business Information - June 2009
Bulkmatic Transport 10.61 8.92 3.35 7.11 5.42 35.40
Miller Transporters, Inc. 10.69 9.07 3.40 6.53 5.43 35.11
Groendyke Transport, Inc. 11.25 9.33 3.00 6.53 4.89 35.01
Prime, Inc. 10.43 8.72 3.38 6.53 5.42 34.48
Schneider National Bulk Carriers 10.11 9.15 3.29 6.08 5.09 33.73
Superior Carriers 10.42 8.94 2.91 6.13 5.23 33.62
Ruan Transport 9.75 8.73 3.00 6.87 5.20 33.55
AVERAGE 10.16 8.82 3.16 6.26 5.10 33.50


On-time Performance Value Information Technology Customer Service Equipment & Operations Weighted Score
All scores are weighted. Weighted scores are determined by multiplying the average raw scores by the average importance of each attribute (1= least important; 5= most important). To find the attributed weights for this category, see the introduction to the Quest for Quality report.
Logistics Management - 2009 Quest for Quality - Truckload and Van Lines - Reed Business Information - June 2009
Paul Arpin Van Lines 10.50 10.67 4.00 6.53 5.13 36.83
Allied Van Lines 11.25 9.33 3.31 7.12 5.50 36.51
Graebel Van Lines 10.69 9.50 2.81 6.80 5.66 35.46
United Van Lines 10.38 8.17 3.00 6.38 4.93 32.86
AVERAGE 10.27 8.36 2.94 6.14 4.79 32.51
RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email
Talkback
Reed Business Information Resource Center

Featured Company


Related Resources

Advertisement

Related Microsite Content

Related Links

More Content
  • Blogs
  • Webcasts

Sorry, no blogs are active for this topic.

View All Blogs RSS

Advertisement
Logistics Management NEWSLETTERS
Logistics Preview
This Week in Logistics
Supply Chain & Logistics Tech Briefs
This Week in Supply Chain
Supply Chain Executive Briefing



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
© 2010 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites