Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Zibb
Subscribe to Logistics Management
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Class 1 revenues, ROI low but improving

By Staff -- Logistics Management, 8/1/2003

Despite the fact that none of the remaining U.S.-based Class 1 railroads managed to operate above their cost of capital in 2002, Surface Transportation Board (STB) Chairman Roger Nober believes that things are getting better for the rail industry. Nevertheless, he says, growth and improvements in service will be needed before any of those carriers will be able to realize a workable return on their investments.

"Railroads are only going to become revenue-adequate if they grow their businesses," Nober says. "But they're only going to grow them through investment."

Revenue adequacy is a term used by the STB to indicate whether or not a rail carrier has achieved a return on investment that's higher than its cost of capital. That cost is determined by three measures: the cost of corporate debt, payment of dividends, and the cost of attracting preferred stock. In 2002, the cost of capital was 9.8 percent.

None of the Class 1 carriers managed to reach the high bar, but Nober says that all are showing improvements. Norfolk Southern, he notes, has made a comeback in return on investment in the past few years. In 1998, the railroad's ROI was 10.5 percent and the cost of capital was 10.7 percent, he recalls. "The next year they bought Conrail. The debt they incurred was captured as an investment, and they [dropped] to 5.2. But they've brought it up [since then] to 9.1. They've been effective in what they've done."

Similarly, he says, when the Union Pacific bought the Southern Pacific in 1996, its ROI plummeted from 8.3 percent to 2.9 percent in just two years. In the years since, the UP has pulled back up to 8.6 percent, the second-highest ROI in the pack.

Despite those improvements, more change is needed, Nober says. "I think all the railroads are coming to the realization that if you want to do a better job of rewarding your investors, you need to be able to attract new capital and new business by offering a better product," he says. "They need to start thinking of themselves as national transportation companies and not as regulated entities. They need to be smart and creative in how they market, and be more efficient and businesslike. If they do that, they can grow their businesses."

2002 ROI for Class 1 railroads

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links

 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Webcasts

Blogs

  • Patrick Burnson
    Critical Cargoes

    January 11, 2008
    Fixing transport infrastructure: Where’s the leadership?
    As reported by LM last week, U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Thomas J. Donohue is calling upon Congress to do something to fund our nat......
    More
  • John A. Gentle
    Sage Advice

    January 11, 2008
    Vehicle Size and Weight – The Voice of Change belongs to you
    The National Academies of Science, Transportation Research Board meets next week to discuss issues facing all modes of Transportation within the U.......
    More
  • View All BlogsRSS
Advertisements





Logistics Management NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

Logistics Preview (Monthly)
This Week in Logistics (Weekly)
Supply Chain & Logistics Tech Briefs (Monthly)
Resource Center E-Alert (Monthly)
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
© 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites