Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Zibb
Subscribe to Logistics Management
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

All-star 3PLs

By Staff -- Logistics Management, 8/1/2005

Logistics managers want a third-party logistics (3PL) company on their team that can put a steady, knowledgeable hand on the controls of their distribution operations. An excellent 3PL offers "coordination with carriers on complaints, demonstration of continuous-improvement culture, and a sense of urgency for correcting carriers' performance failures," wrote one operations manager.

Readers also told us they looked for 3PLs that brought specific expertise to the table. A quality leader in third-party logistics should "bring knowledge of an industry and [have] an ability to review the requirements to make suggestions on how to improve efficiencies while reducing costs," commented a logistics manager.

For more information on Quest for Quality, click here.

Many participants said that a quality 3PL is responsive to customers' concerns and needs. Excellent customer service typifies a top-notch distribution provider, said one reader, who added, "I want what I want, when I want it."

This year, our readers paid homage to 17 contract distribution firms for outstanding service. Three of those companies—FedEx Supply Chain Services, UPS Supply Chain Solutions, and Con-Way Logistics—also won accolades last year. Joining them in the MVP ranks were P&O Nedlloyd Logistics, Lynden Logistics, UTi Integrated Logistics, Kane is Able, Americold Logistics, Total Logistic Control (TLC), NYK Logistics, Averitt Express Supply Chain Solutions, Expeditors International of Washington, Kuehne & Nagel Logistics, Caterpillar Logistics Services, Penske Logistics, TNT Logistics, and Pacer Global Logistics.

It should be noted that 3PLs are rated on different criteria than are other providers in our survey. In this category, service providers are evaluated on carrier selection and negotiation, order fulfillment, transportation and distribution, inventory management, and logistics information systems.

Third-party logistics companies have improved their performance in some areas, as the ratings for two categories increased compared to last year. The score for order fulfillment advanced from 7.35 to 7.94, while inventory management posted a gain, rising from 5.11 to 5.75. Scores for three other categories, on the other hand, declined. The rating for carrier selection and negotiation slipped from 7.68 to 7.65, the score for transportation and distribution dropped from 8.22 to 7.55, and the rating for logistics information systems fell from 5.90 to 5.67.

Despite those numbers, the overall weighted score for 3PLs rose from 34.26 to 34.55.

Third-Party Logistics
Carrier Selection/Negotiation Order Fulfillment Transportation/Distribution Inventory management Logistics Information Systems Weighted Score
P&O Nedlloyd Logistics 8.25 10.20 8.00 7.80 5.83 40.08
Lynden Logistics 8.80 9.07 8.53 6.93 6.67 40.00
FedEx Supply Chain Services 8.80 9.15 8.57 6.53 6.64 39.68
UTi Integrated Logistics 8.80 9.07 8.53 6.93 6.25 39.58
Kane is Able 6.60 10.20 9.60 7.80 5.00 39.20
Americold Logistics 9.07 8.50 8.80 5.85 6.88 39.10
Total Logistic Control 9.90 6.80 9. 60 6.50 5.00 37.80
UPS Supply Chain Solutions 8.16 8.41 8.06 6.23 6.27 37.13
NYK Logistics 8.58 6.80 8.00 6.07 6.25 35.70
Averitt Express Supply Chain Solutions 7.87 8.11 7.88 5.60 6.15 35.61
Expeditors Int'l of Washington 8.12 7.73 8.00 5.63 6.04 35.53
Kuehne & Nagel Logistics 7.70 8.22 8.00 6.15 5.21 35.27
Caterpillar Logistics Services 7.92 8.16 8.32 5.85 5.00 35.25
Penske Logistics 8.25 7.82 7.36 6.07 5.68 35.18
TNT Logistics 7.70 8.31 7.11 6.36 5.56 35.03
Pacer Global Logistics 7.26 8.16 7.04 6.24 6.00 34.70
Con-Way Logistics 7.82 7.96 7.75 5.56 5.61 34.70
Average 7.65 7.94 7.55 5.75 5.67 34.55
All scores are weighted. Weighted scores are determined by multiplying the average raw scores by the average importance of each attribute (1 = least important; 5 = most important). To find the attributed weights for this category, see the introduction to the Quest for Quality report.
Source: Logistics Management, Reed Research Group

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links

 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Webcasts

Blogs

  • Patrick Burnson
    Critical Cargoes

    January 11, 2008
    Fixing transport infrastructure: Where’s the leadership?
    As reported by LM last week, U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Thomas J. Donohue is calling upon Congress to do something to fund our nat......
    More
  • John A. Gentle
    Sage Advice

    January 11, 2008
    Vehicle Size and Weight – The Voice of Change belongs to you
    The National Academies of Science, Transportation Research Board meets next week to discuss issues facing all modes of Transportation within the U.......
    More
  • View All BlogsRSS
Advertisements





Logistics Management NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

Logistics Preview (Monthly)
This Week in Logistics (Weekly)
Supply Chain & Logistics Tech Briefs (Monthly)
Resource Center E-Alert (Monthly)
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
© 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites