Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Zibb
Subscribe to Logistics Management
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Team Players

Quest for Quality - Third-Party Logistics

By Staff -- Logistics Management, 8/1/2006

Quest for QualityAll indicators point to the rapid service expansion and solid revenue growth for the third-party logistics (3PL) marketplace. As a matter of fact, global expenditure on 3PL services is set to increase significantly over the next five years, says the U.K.-based research firm Datamonitor.

Meanwhile, according to a recently released report by Armstrong & Associates, in 2005 revenues for U.S.-based 3PLs passed the $100 billion mark for the first time.

The recipe for growth in this sector seems simple: As long as shippers are faced with capacity constraints and feel the pressure to improve global tracking and IT in order to run a modern supply chain, there appears to be no limit to a successful 3PL’s potential. And most shippers agree—that is, if providers are ready and willing to dig in and partner with them for the long haul, both domestically and internationally.

After sifting through a record amount of reader feedback on 3PL performance over the past year, it was relatively easy to find the common denominators. “A top 3PL offers flexibility, superior customer service, rock-solid reliability, and is willing to become a true partner to help us improve operating and freight costs,” said one satisfied shipper. “A 3PL must exhibit a willingness to do what it takes to get the job done,” said another. “The ideal partnership is having a 3PL being concerned about their customer and acting like they are an actual branch of that customer’s operations,” he added.

This year, our readers paid homage to 11 third-party logistics partners. The overall weighted average dipped a couple of points from our 2005 findings, but this year’s winners all met or exceeded an impressive score of 32.96. Transplace led the pack this year with a 42.05 weighted average, followed by Ozburn-Hessey Logistics (38.53), FedEx Supply Chain Services (36.89), Expeditors International of Washington (36.18), UPS Supply Chain Solutions (35.76), Landstar Logistics (34.61), ADP Logistics (33.78), Menlo Worldwide (33.75), Ryder Supply Chain Solutions (33.71), NYK Logistics (33.47), and BAX Global (32.96).

It should be noted that due to the nature of their business, 3PLs are rated on different criteria than are other providers in our survey. In this category, service providers are evaluated on: Carrier Selection/Negotiation, Order Fulfillment, Transportation/Distribution, Inventory Management, and Logistics Information Systems.

As a matter of fact, Logistics Information Systems was the only key attribute category in which the weighted average score actually improved this year. That number rose to 6.07, up from from 5.67 in 2005. Transplace posted a whopping 8.06 in this category this year, more than a full point higher than the other winners.

National LTL | Regional LTL | Truckload | Rail/Intermodal | Ocean Carriers | Air Carriers | Freight Forwarders | Third-Party Logistics


Third-Party Logistics (color chart)
Carrier Selection/Negotiation Order Fulfillment Transportation/Distribution Inventory Management Logistics Information Systems Weighted Score
Transplace 8.22 9.58 9.34 6.85 8.06 42.05
Ozburn-Hessey Logistics 7.23 9.28 7.87 7.15 7.00 38.53
FedEx Supply Chain Services 7.15 8.52 8.09 6.14 7.00 36.89
Expeditors Int’l of Washington 7.45 7.97 8.00 5.76 7.00 36.18
UPS Supply Chain Solutions 6.95 8.40 7.75 6.09 6.57 35.76
Landstar Logistics 7.13 7.85 7.52 5.65 6.46 34.61
ADP Logistics (A. Duie Pyle) 6.86 7.74 7.47 5.49 6.22 33.78
Menlo Worldwide Logistics 7.00 7.61 7.29 5.54 6.32 33.75
Ryder Supply Chain Solutions 6.91 7.34 7.47 5.92 6.07 33.71
NYK Logistics 6.67 7.86 7.27 5.72 5.95 33.47
BAX Global 6.35 7.73 7.24 5.57 6.08 32.96
AVERAGE 6.55 7.57 7.20 5.56 6.07 32.96
All scores are weighted. Weighted scores are determined by multiplying the average raw scores by the average importance of each attribute (1 = least important; 5 = most important). To find the attributed weights for this category, see the introduction to the Quest for Quality report.
Source: Logistics Management, Reed Research Group

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Sponsored Links

 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Webcasts

Blogs

  • Patrick Burnson
    Critical Cargoes

    April 10, 2008
    U.S. Exporters: All Dressed Up and No Place to Go?
    Just when overseas demand for U.S. raw materials and manufactured goods is ramping up, shippers are scrambling to find containers and chassis to me......
    More
  • John A. Gentle
    Sage Advice

    February 26, 2008
    Tips to become a Logistics professional
    One of our website readers wrote in with an interesting question regarding developing a career in logistics. Firas writes: “I am a young I......
    More
  • View All BlogsRSS
Advertisements





Logistics Management NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

Logistics Preview (Monthly)
This Week in Logistics (Weekly)
Supply Chain & Logistics Tech Briefs (Monthly)
Resource Center E-Alert (Monthly)
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
© 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites