Log In  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Zibb
Subscribe to Logistics Management

Seeking a lower National Motor Freight Classification rating?

By Ray Bohman -- Logistics Management, 7/1/2008

BohmanAs you well know, all commodities described in the National Motor Freight Classification (NMFC)—more than 10,000 in number—are assigned one or more of the 18 different classification ratings (or classes). Those ratings range from a low of Class 50, for things like used motors, to as high as Class 500 for cargo like ping pong balls.

You may wonder what classification factors are considered in assigning one or more of those 18 ratings. For many years the then existing Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) allowed over 15 different classification factors to be considered and weighed.

Just prior to being sunsetted, the ICC limited the number of factors to be considered to just four. They are 1) density, or the weight per cubic foot; 2) liability, or the susceptibility to theft and liability to damage; 3) stowability, or how well it's stowed in a carrier's equipment; and 4) handling.

All four factors are considered and weighed, but if the second through fourth classification factors are within normal ranges, they are given little weight. That being the case, in most instances, density (weight per cubic foot) becomes the controlling factor.

In pegging a classification rating for a particular commodity, the Commodity Classification Standards Board (CCSB) doesn't just throw a dart at a dart board. In cases where the range in densities is fairly narrow, the CCSB generally assigns a classification rating based on the CCSB density guidelines. If the range in densities is fairly wide, the CCSB generally assigns a multiple scale of classification ratings based on density.

If you are thinking of seeking a lower classification rating on a product that is currently assigned a specific rating, make sure that you are in line with the current CCSB density guidelines. If the actual density is five pounds per cubic foot, but takes a rating of Class 100, forget about seeking a lower class. Your effort could well backfire with you being hit with an increase to Class 150.


Author Information
Ray Bohman, is president of The Bohman Group, consultants and publishers in the freight transportation field. He can be reached at (508) 945-2272

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links


 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Webcasts

Blogs

  • Patrick Burnson
    Critical Cargoes

    May 19, 2009
    NCBFAA tells Obama to cut elsewhere
    In a letter to members of the House and Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security, the National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Asso......
    More
  • Patrick Burnson
    Critical Cargoes

    May 13, 2009
    U.S. Chamber Champions Cuban "Engagement"
    Count on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to be among those joining Critical Cargoes in backing moves to ease restrictions on trade with Cuba. &ldquo......
    More
  • View All BlogsRSS
Advertisements





Logistics Management NEWSLETTERS

Logistics Preview
This Week in Logistics
Supply Chain & Logistics Tech Briefs
Supply Chain Executive Briefing
Supply Chain Executive Resources
Please read our Privacy Policy
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
© 2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites