Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Zibb
Subscribe to Logistics Management
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Quest for Quality -FREIGHT FORWARDERS: Foreign policy titans

-- Logistics Management, 8/1/2008

Southwest Airlines

When you dig into the numbers over the past year it would be tough to find a group under more pressure from rising fuel costs than the world’s air carriers. As LM’s Karen Thuermer reported last month in our 2008 Annual Report, the high cost of fuel is affecting the financial health of nearly every air carrier in the global market.

As a matter of fact, Thuermer did a terrific job of putting it into perspective—and some of the startling numbers bare repeating. James May, CEO of the Air Transport Association of America, told her that U.S. airlines are projected to spend nearly $60 billion on fuel in 2008, that’s $18 billion more than in 2007. The increase in fuel is the equivalent of employing 244,000 airline workers or purchasing 261 narrow-body jets.

25th Annual Quest for Quality Awards: Delivering on the promise

THIRD-PARTY LOGISTICS:
Shifting in the polls

FREIGHT FORWARDERS:
Foreign policy titans

AIR CARRIERS:
Delivering under pressure

OCEAN CARRIERS:
Steadfast incumbents

RAIL/INTERMODAL:
Popularity rising in the polls

TRUCKLOAD:
Influential long-haulers

REGIONAL LTL:
Perennial local front runners

NATIONAL LTL:
Canvassing the nation

Order Online
click here to order online

Well, the good news for the most viable air carriers is that shippers who use their services are telling us that performance in the category has actually improved over our 2007 survey in Value, Information Technology, Customer Service, and Equipment & Operations—even in light of soaring rates.

This year 14 air carriers scored better than the overall weighted average of 32.57, a slightly better overall average for the category over 2007. For the third year in a row Southwest Airlines is first to hit the runway, putting up a very impressive 39.86 weighted score. Southwest beat their 2007 score by nearly 4 full points, taking first place in On-time Performance (12.51), Value (10.03), Customer Service (7.97), and Equipment & Operations (4.30). It’s interesting to note that Singapore Airlines posed the highest score in the Information Technology category, posting a 5.22.

Pulling up to gate right behind Southwest is Emirates SkyCargo with a 35.53 weighted score. While Emirates did not take first place in any of the attribute categories, they’re a very good example of a carrier that scored consistently high marks across the board, scoring a second-place 11.78 in the all-important On-time Performance category.

As we find year after year, shippers are fairly loyal to their Air Cargo carriers and tend to give high marks to a consistent group of players. Beside Southwest, Emirates, and Singapore Airlines, we find eight other repeat winners from 2007. Carriers taking the podium again this year include Virgin Atlantic (35.28), Lufthansa (34.38), Japan Airlines (34.29), Nippon Cargo Airlines (34.14), KLM (34.02), Cathay Pacific (33.76), Korean Air (33.46), and Alaska Airlines (32.57).

In the always heated battle for supremacy in the Air Express Carriers category, FedEx has once again just squeaked by UPS with an inspiring 37.58 weighted average.

 

 

 

Air Cargo Carriers

On-time Performance Value Information Technology Customer Service Equipment & Operations Weighted Score
Southwest Airlines 12.51 10.03 5.05 7.97 4.30 39.86
Emirates SkyCargo 11.78 8.40 4.82 6.86 3.68 35.53
Virgin Atlantic 10.95 9.00 4.52 7.05 3.76 35.28
Continental Airlines 11.16 8.29 4.88 6.93 3.78 35.05
Singapore Airlines (SIA) 11.22 7.47 5.22 6.97 3.84 34.72
Lufthansa 11.44 7.20 5.13 6.74 3.87 34.38
Japan Airlines 11.17 7.75 5.04 6.60 3.73 34.29
EVA Cargo 10.30 8.67 4.80 6.68 3.71 34.17
Nippon Cargo Airlines 11.23 8.10 4.47 6.68 3.66 34.14
KLM 10.82 8.03 4.80 6.69 3.69 34.02
Cathay Pacific 11.14 8.04 4.67 6.16 3.75 33.76
Swiss WorldCargo 10.64 7.92 4.95 6.55 3.60 33.65
Korean Air 10.91 8.25 4.45 6.28 3.56 33.46
Alaska Airlines 10.30 7.77 4.52 6.17 3.82 32.57
AVERAGE 10.28 7.77 4.64 6.28 3.59 32.57
Logistics Management - 2008 Quest for Quality - Air Cargo Carriers - Reed Business Information - June 2008

On-time Performance Value Information Technology Customer Service Equipment & Operations Weighted Score
FedEx Express 12.20 8.11 5.80 7.32 4.15 37.58
UPS Freight 11.16 7.96 5.56 6.64 4.03 35.36
AVERAGE 10.65 7.91 5.10 6.46 3.79 33.91
All scores are weighted. Weighted scores are determined by multiplying the average raw scores by the average importance of each attribute (1= least important; 5= most important). To find the attributed weights for this category, see the introduction to the Quest for Quality report.
Logistics Management - 2008 Quest for Quality - Air Express Carriers - Reed Business Information - June 2008
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

There are no other articles written by this author.

Sponsored Links

 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Webcasts

Blogs

  • Patrick Burnson
    Critical Cargoes

    April 10, 2008
    U.S. Exporters: All Dressed Up and No Place to Go?
    Just when overseas demand for U.S. raw materials and manufactured goods is ramping up, shippers are scrambling to find containers and chassis to me......
    More
  • John A. Gentle
    Sage Advice

    February 26, 2008
    Tips to become a Logistics professional
    One of our website readers wrote in with an interesting question regarding developing a career in logistics. Firas writes: “I am a young I......
    More
  • View All BlogsRSS
Advertisements





Logistics Management NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

Logistics Preview (Monthly)
This Week in Logistics (Weekly)
Supply Chain & Logistics Tech Briefs (Monthly)
Resource Center E-Alert (Monthly)
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
© 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites