Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Zibb
Subscribe to Logistics Management
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Ports respond to ATA suit

NITL (The National Industrial Transportation League) -- Logistics Management, 8/26/2008

NITL logoThe Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach (August 21) filed their response in opposition to the court complaint made last month by the American Trucking Associations (ATA) which is seeking a preliminary injunction against the port's Clean Truck Program as it applies to the licensing of truckers permitted to operate in the ports.

The ports argue that the ATA complaint is without legal basis for three reasons. First, the statute that the ATA claims is a bar to local entities from regulating trucks does not apply to special tidelands property on which the ports are located. The ports' view is that the U.S. Supreme

Court decided that tidelands were granted to California under the U.S. Constitution and subsequently granted to the cities. Therefore, absent Congressional intent, a federal statute will not interfere with the ports' right to manage and control such land.

Second, the ports claim the statute does not apply to action taken by landholders (i.e. the ports), and as "commercial enterprises…in the business of providing world-class port facilities and services" the ports are not "regulating" the drayage truck industry.

Third, the ports maintain that the statute does not apply to port actions directed to the safety and security of the ports, which is a major goal of the Clean Truck Program concession agreement.

The ports also point out that the ATA's alleged injuries are merely financial in nature and therefore cannot justify the action the preliminary injunction seeks.

The court has scheduled a hearing for September 8 to hear arguments on the motion for preliminary injunction.

Meanwhile the National Retail Federation (NRF) has filed an amicus (friend of the court) brief in support of the ATA position. NRF specifically attacks the ports' expected defense that they are market participants and as such are not regulating an industry. NRF also warned the court that what happens at the southern California ports is likely to spread

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

articleMoreByThisAuthorLB

Sponsored Links

 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Webcasts

Blogs

  • Patrick Burnson
    Critical Cargoes

    January 11, 2008
    Fixing transport infrastructure: Where’s the leadership?
    As reported by LM last week, U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Thomas J. Donohue is calling upon Congress to do something to fund our nat......
    More
  • John A. Gentle
    Sage Advice

    January 11, 2008
    Vehicle Size and Weight – The Voice of Change belongs to you
    The National Academies of Science, Transportation Research Board meets next week to discuss issues facing all modes of Transportation within the U.......
    More
  • View All BlogsRSS
Advertisements





Logistics Management NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

Logistics Preview (Monthly)
This Week in Logistics (Weekly)
Supply Chain & Logistics Tech Briefs (Monthly)
Resource Center E-Alert (Monthly)
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
© 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites