Login  |  Register          Free Newsletter Subscription
Zibb
Subscribe to Logistics Management
Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Ocean Carriers: 50 players to watch

This time last year analysts were predicting that “second tier” carriers would begin drifting toward the top of the list—and indeed that has been the trend. However, this year we evaluate the Top 50 and see that the big just keep getting bigger.

By Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor -- Logistics Management, 10/1/2008

When examining the ocean carrier industry, the big just keep getting bigger, say today’s maritime experts, while competition for market share remains heated at the bottom where rationalization of sailings and shared terminal resources will be needed by many carriers if they are to survive.

Indeed, the large global piece of this enterprise still belongs to the three world leading carriers—Maersk Line, MSC, and CMA CGM—which, when combined, has grown from 32.1 percent to 34.1 percent in terms of twenty-equivalent unit (TEU) capacity over the past year. And historical perspective indicates that a certain Danish carrier is resurgent.

“Taking the eight-year old figures of 2000 as a comparison, the three leading lines at the time, Maersk Sealand, Evergreen, and P&O Nedlloyd, had a combined market share of 23.7 percent,” observes Steven Fletcher, commercial director for AXS Marine, an ocean cargo analyst firm based in Paris. “However, the growth in 2007 was far from being equally shared by the three leading lines, since Maersk Line was restructuring.”

According to the latest figures published in AXS-Alphaliner’s annual survey (Liner Market Shares/www.axs-alphaliner.com.) that examines the evolution of the global liner market shares, that restructure is now complete. “During the first eight months of 2008, Maersk’s operated fleet grew by 6.3 percent, which is the best growth rate achieved among the top five carriers,” says Fletcher.

But Maersk’s group CEO Nils Andersen maintains that the container shipping and related activities divisions—comprising Maersk Line, Safmarine, Maersk Logistics/Damco, and inland services—only improved marginally in “difficult market conditions” over this period. He says that the entire enterprise will come under severe pressure in the remainder of the year with the global economic downturn, falling freight rates, high bunker costs, and potential excess vessel capacity.

Still, the group’s net result from container activities after six months of 2008 was $73 million, an improvement from a loss of $219 million in the same period a year ago. Andersen notes that the company is prepared to lose some market in the short term if it improves profitability.

“Given the present market conditions, we are quite pleased that we don’t have the largest order book coming on stream for the next couple of years,” he says. “That means we will have to accept some loss of market share. We want to make it as little as possible, but we want to reach that objective through a better utilization rate. Of course, over time we want to grow with the market but it’s not a short-term priority,” Andersen adds.

This is in keeping with observations made by Fletcher, who says in his report that Maersk has been inactive on the ordering side for a while, although in this respect, it is far from alone: “Carriers are obviously taking a breath after last year’s hectic ordering activity.”

Furthermore, he says, Maersk is not in a position to maintain its market share over 16 percent in the medium term (2009-2011), unless vigorous chartering activity helps to keep the pace of its competitors. “Quite remarkably, MSC and CMA CGM are among the very few carriers which are family businesses and thus do not have to bow to shareholder pressure,” says Fletcher. “They are also the best placed to still increase their market share, with huge orderbooks dwarfing those of rivals.”

Rising stars & old stalwarts

According to Fletcher, the three rising stars this decade are CMA CGM, MSC, and CSCL. “This trio deserves a particular mention as these lines grew organically for the most part, although CMA CGM bought a few niche carriers,” he says.

Evergreen, has grown modestly over the past year, but is being recognized for its service enhancements by some of the nation’s largest shippers. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., for example, chose it as International Ocean Carrier of the Year for 2007-2008. Spokesmen for the giant retailer say that even during peak seasons the Taiwanese carrier provided consistent coordination and reliable performance.

High shipper marks were given to Hapag-Lloyd AG, for making Customs clearance faster this year. By obtaining the Authorized Economic Operator (AEO) Certificate, U.S. exporters were able to get goods to market from plants here and in Asia in a much more time-efficient manner. Given the fact that the carrier is still for sale, however, its fortunes remain unclear.

And while a slowdown in shipping volumes and a rapid cyclical downturn in container shipping in the Transpacific triggered concerns over its earning growth in the second half of the year, COSCO, too, is making money. Financial analysts note that China COSCO Holdings—the flagship of the country’s premier shipping conglomerate—beat forecasts to more than double its first-half earnings as China’s unabated demand for resources and materials lifted freight rates.

APL, the core container shipping business of Neptune Orient Lines Limited (NOL), may grow larger still if a bid to acquire Hapag-Lloyd takes hold. APL, saw revenues rise 32 percent to $3.94 billion for the first half of this year, carrying record volumes of 1.27 million FEU (forty-foot equivalent unit) in during that time frame. But spokesmen are hardly bullish on the immediate future.

“The combination of continuing growth in container volumes and effective yield management enabled APL to deliver an improved earnings performance for the half year, although there was a decline in the results for the second quarter,” notes APL’s CEO, Ron Widdows. “Costs, particularly for fuel, have continued to escalate.”

Economic pressure will continue

Ocean liners comprising the rest of the Top 50 will also be operating in a significantly more challenging operating environment, say analysts. Staying in the game at all may even become difficult for some asset-strapped carriers.

“World ocean container trade activity is increasingly reflecting the slowdown in economies other than the already-weak U.S. economy,” notes Paul Bingham, an economist with Global Insight. “The deterioration in the economies of some of the developed countries in Europe and Asia has accelerated, causing us to revise downwards our near-term forecasts of ocean container trade. The downward revision is from already-weak trade volumes forecasted for 2008 and 2009.”

According to Bingham, U.S. containerized imports will decline 8.2 percent in 2008, which is slightly more pessimistic than our previous projection of a 7.1 percent decline. “This revision is based mostly on a deteriorating outlook for imports through the Gulf ports,” says Bingham. “On the positive side,” he adds, “we have increased the 2008 U.S. export growth forecast from 17.7 percent to 22.6 percent. Major U.S. export destinations for which we revised our forecasts significantly upwards include Brazil, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, and South Korea. The year-over-year export growth was even more substantial in the first half of this year at 26.6 percent.”

Bingham expects, however, that export expansion will slow in the second half of this year due to the worsening production prospects in Europe and the appreciation of the U.S. dollar. And don’t expect to see too much upward movement in our “Top 50” next year, says Bingham. With new container vessel deliveries coming at a time when both the Transpacific and the Far East-to-Europe trades are weak, he believes the pressures on freight rates will be downwards if the steamship lines cannot continue to manage their capacity.

“We have already seen declining spot rates from the Far East, and the normal peak season surcharges are not being brought in due to weak volumes,” he says. “The ability to add to vessel strings is substantially down from last year, when vessels were shifted from the transpacific to the Far East Europe trade lane, which has now resulted in overcapacity and utilization that has dropped well below the 90 percent level.”

By way of proof, he notes that at least two steamship lines have shifted capacity into temporary by skipping a voyage all together this year. “This is equivalent to a 63-day lay-up,” adds Bingham.

Total Owned Chartered Orderbook
Rank Operator TEU Ships TEU Ships TEU Ships % Chart TEU Ships % existing
1 APM-Maersk 2,026,675 540 1,089,220 200 937,455 340 46.3% 455,742 92 22.5%
2 Mediterranean Shg Co 1,363,380 414 755,170 225 608,210 189 44.6% 571,530 48 41.9%
3 CMA CGM Group 966,217 394 295,025 93 671,192 301 69.5% 664,894 79 68.8%
4 Evergreen Line 636,459 183 363,425 102 273,034 81 42.9% 4,298 1 0.7%
5 Hapag-Lloyd 499,290 136 265,331 62 233,959 74 46.9% 122,500 14 24.5%
6 COSCO Container L. 484,833 156 273,847 100 210,986 56 43.5% 504,880 70 104.1%
7 APL 463,073 131 139,714 38 323,359 93 69.8% 192,380 26 41.5%
8 CSCL 433,684 137 258,236 85 175,448 52 40.5% 258,081 38 59.5%
9 NYK 420,116 122 273,042 51 147,074 71 35.0% 194,476 35 46.3%
10 Hanjin/Senator 376,742 91 139,646 27 237,096 64 62.9% 301,786 37 80.1%
11 MOL 376,375 114 172,934 38 203,441 76 54.1% 217,967 39 57.9%
12 OOCL 357,934 84 209,493 37 148,441 47 41.5% 129,632 20 36.2%
13 K Line 305,069 92 169,306 34 135,763 58 44.5% 183,370 37 60.1%
14 Zim 298,618 116 126,289 38 172,329 78 57.7% 294,997 42 98.8%
15 Yang Ming Line 294,499 84 189,297 53 105,202 31 35.7% 195,878 32 66.5%
16 Hamburg Süd Group 288,694 116 124,049 39 164,645 77 57.0% 177,154 34 61.4%
17 CSAV Group 279,942 91 21,208 4 258,734 87 92.4% 160,719 22 57.4%
18 Hyundai M.M. 251,877 59 83,657 17 168,220 42 66.8% 132,810 14 52.7%
19 PIL (Pacific Int. Line) 190,420 114 112,007 73 78,413 41 41.2% 81,135 23 42.6%
20 Wan Hai Lines 144,032 83 101,237 52 42,795 31 29.7% 52,402 19 36.4%
21 UASC 136,468 44 103,608 30 32,860 14 24.1% 172,734 20 126.6%
22 MISC Berhad 96,221 30 40,151 15 56,070 15 58.3%
23 IRIS Lines 95,514 63 77,703 47 17,811 16 18.6% 65,013 32 68.1%
24 RCL (Regional Container Line) 57,836 44 38,782 32 19,054 12 32.9% 5,464 2 9.4%
25 Grimaldi (Napoli) 57,440 61 46,107 42 11,333 19 19.7% 6,124 11 10.7%
26 Sea Consortium 56,411 64 56,411 64 100.0%
27 CCNI 49,486 22 3,630 1 45,856 21 92.7%
28 Maruba + CLAN 45,008 19 45,008 19 100.0% 3,534 1 7.9%
29 TS Lines 38,758 23 4,734 3 34,024 20 87.8% 2,702 1 7.0%
30 Swire Shipping 38,224 36 19,094 17 19,130 19 50.0% 13,800 6 36.1%
31 KMTC 36,316 29 16,382 17 19,934 12 54.9%
32 Seaboard Marine 34,522 42 7,690 11 26,832 31 77.7%
33 Schöller Group 33,763 26 1,034 1 32,729 25 96.9% 20,290 10 60.1%
34 Horizon Lines 32,683 16 18,557 11 14,126 5 43.2%
35 Matson 31,433 17 30,776 16 657 1 2.1%
36 Samudera 30,463 34 5,146 11 25,317 23 83.1% 3,852 3 12.6%
37 East Med Express (EMES) 29,645 31 12,090 12 17,555 19 59.2%
38 SITC 28,872 37 9,908 13 18,964 24 65.7% 2,721 3 9.4%
39 UniFeeder 28,460 37 28,460 37 100.0%
40 Nile Dutch Shg 27,367 21 4,117 5 23,250 16 85.0%
41 Emirates Shipping Line 26,533 10 26,533 10 100.0%
42 OEL/Shreyas 22,816 21 10,973 12 11,843 9 51.9% 3,464 2 15.2%
43 Linea Messina 22,327 18 21,435 16 892 2 4.0%
44 United Feeder Services 22,274 31 22,274 31 100.0%
45 Rickmers Linie 22,032 16 16,992 9 5,040 7 22.9% 19,312 18 87.7%
46 Sinokor 21,342 26 12,813 15 8,529 11 40.0%
47 Heung-A Shipping 20,885 26 6,808 12 14,077 14 67.4%
48 Delphis NV/Team Lines 20,679 31 20,679 31 100.0% 28,668 10 138.6%
49 SYMS 19,861 18 19,861 18 100.0%
50 Chipolbrok 19,762 18 19,762 18 11,100 6 56.2%
All information above is given as guidance only and in good faith without guarantee © Alphaliner 1999-2008

Email
Print
Reprint
Learn RSS

Talkback

We would love your feedback!

Post a comment

» VIEW ALL TALKBACK THREADS

Related Content

Related Content

 

By This Author

Sponsored Links

 
Advertisement

More Content

  • Blogs
  • Webcasts

Blogs

  • Patrick Burnson
    Critical Cargoes

    January 11, 2008
    Fixing transport infrastructure: Where’s the leadership?
    As reported by LM last week, U.S. Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Thomas J. Donohue is calling upon Congress to do something to fund our nat......
    More
  • John A. Gentle
    Sage Advice

    January 11, 2008
    Vehicle Size and Weight – The Voice of Change belongs to you
    The National Academies of Science, Transportation Research Board meets next week to discuss issues facing all modes of Transportation within the U.......
    More
  • View All BlogsRSS
Advertisements





Logistics Management NEWSLETTERS

Click on a title below to learn more.

Logistics Preview (Monthly)
This Week in Logistics (Weekly)
Supply Chain & Logistics Tech Briefs (Monthly)
Resource Center E-Alert (Monthly)
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
© 2008 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites