Aggregate Low Volume Lanes, Lower Transportation Costs

Research by students at the MIT showed that shippers who aggregated low volume lanes acquired favorable pricing.

<p>Research by students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology showed that shippers who aggregated low volume lanes acquired favorable pricing. See how aggregating lanes and contract pricing can save shippers up to 15 percent.</p>

Research by students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology showed that shippers who aggregated low volume lanes acquired favorable pricing. See how aggregating lanes and contract pricing can save shippers up to 15 percent.

in the News

State of Logistics 2016: Pursue mutual benefit
Don’t forget the three point stance.
U.S.-NAFTA freight sees 10 percent annual decrease in July, reports BTS
AAR reports annual declines for week ending September 17
How Lean is your Lean Quality Program?
More News
By · September 21, 2011

By default, most shippers send RFPs that ask carriers for point-to-point pricing on long haul loads (moving more than 250 miles from origin to destination). As a result, most lanes will be classified as “low volume,” subject to more costly spot market pricing, rather than contract pricing. Our research shows that by aggregating low volume lanes—by defining origin and destination sizes more broadly than point-to-point—shippers can increase the total shipments moving in a lane at more favorable contract pricing, saving up to 15 percent over spot market rates.

Research by students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology showed that shippers who aggregated low volume lanes acquired favorable pricing. See how aggregating lanes and contract pricing can save shippers up to 15 percent.

Shippers may already have a general sense that combining and redefining some lanes—particularly those identified as being low volume lanes—could lead to transportation cost savings.


Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Latest Whitepaper
How Lean is your Lean Quality Program?
Avoid quality program bureaucracy that can sap logistics productivity and increase costs
Download Today!
From the September 2016 Issue
Indecision revolving around three complex supply chain elements—transportation, technology and organizational structure—finds many companies waiting to commit to a strategic path. However, waiting too long will only result in a competitive disadvantage that will be difficult to overcome in today’s fast-paced, global economy.
Time for Asia’s ports to rebuild
Is the freight recession upon us…again?
View More From this Issue
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Sign up today to receive our FREE, weekly email newsletter!
Latest Webcast
Supply Chain Best Practices: Visibility to In-Transit Inventory
During this webcast you'll learn on how various organizations have gained instant access to in-transit parcels and given access to this information to stakeholders.
Register Today!
EDITORS' PICKS
25th Annual Masters of Logistics
Indecision revolving around three complex supply chain elements—transportation, technology and...
2016 Quest for Quality: Winners Take the Spotlight
Which carriers, third-party logistics providers and U.S. ports have crossed the service-excellence...

Regional ports concentrate on growth and connectivity
With the Panama Canal expansion complete, ocean cargo gateways in the Caribbean are investing to...
Digital Reality Check
Just how close are we to the ideal digital supply network? Not as close as we might like to think....