Airbus must compete now on a level playing field
April 03, 2011
One must wonder why The European Commission would welcome last week’s World Trade Organization’s final case ruling on subsidies, as it clearly favors Boeing over Airbus. Still, a proud face was put up by the EU members, who maintain that Boeing has received subsidies in the past and continues to receive them today.
All too true, Boeing admits, but the scale of those federal and state gifts for NASA-related programs pales in comparison. Airbus received more than $20 billion in impermissible funding versus $2.7 billion for Boeing.
As I reported in Supply Chain Management Review, Boeing executives said that measuring this decision with that of last June reveals a market distorted by Airbus’ practices, with illegal launch aid being the “key discriminator.”
Added Boeing: “The WTO ruling on launch aid goes to the heart of the Airbus business model, which now must change. In contrast, there are no comparable findings or consequences to the U.S. or Boeing from today’s decision, as the WTO has now fully and finally rejected most of the EU’s claims.”
The EU’s countersuit victory is pyrrhic at best, as it means Airbus will now have to scramble in an effort to recover market share without massive government aid.
For related stories click here.
About the Author

Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).
Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine
Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage yourentire logistics operation. Start your FREE subscription today!



Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.