Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!



ATA chief Graves says despite its many challenges, trucking sector is well-positioned for future

By Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
October 09, 2012

It is well known that the trucking industry faces many challenges and obstacles. That is pretty much an understatement.

And at this week’s American Trucking Associations (ATA) annual Management Conference & Exhibition ATA President and CEO Bill Graves laid out all the issues on the table in a wide-ranging keynote address.

Not surprisingly, the ATA chief pointed to Washington as a major culprit for many of the industry’s concerns on a few different fronts, including: a sluggish economy; a “very dysfunctional federal government”; and how the currently assembled government “isn’t capable of getting the job done.”

Also high on the list of trucking industry concerns were regulations, namely CSA, HOS, and EOBR.

Here is what he had to say about CSA:
“We still believe that CSA is fundamentally the program that will make travel on the nation’s highways safer. But it must be implemented and managed in such a way as to instill confidence with the industry that our ‘buy in’ to the program will make our companies stronger and not be penalized by inaccurate data or misrepresentation by the shipping community or the media.”

Harsh? Maybe. But definitely true, save for that media part anyhow.

In addressing HOS, Graves explained that the current rule was getting the job done effectively (the new HOS rule scheduled to go into effect in mid-2013) and said the changes were the result of “political pressures brought to bear from the White House rather than the FMCSA believing further change was necessary or could be justified.”

Other industry challenges cited by Graves included the truck driver shortage, the weak economic recovery, insufficient federal support for infrastructure, tolling increases, and increasing fuel prices.

Even with these various challenges, Graves said trucking is on a strong road for future growth, commenting that “the essentiality of the industry and the demand for freight movement by truck—a growing demand for freight movement by truck—is unquestioned. The long-term macro outlook for trucking has never been better, but the near-term micro view continues to be very challenging.”

About the Author

Jeff Berman headshot
Jeff Berman
Group News Editor

Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Working with research partner, The Economist Intelligence Unit, the IBM Institute for Business Value surveyed 1,023 global procurement executives from 41 countries in North America, Europe and Asia.

U.S. Carloads were down 7.8 percent annually at 259,544, and intermodal volume was off 15.7 percent for the week ending February 21 at 213,617 containers and trailers.

The Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Logistics (BTS) reported this week that U.S. trade with its North America Free Trade Agreement partners Canada and Mexico in December 2014 was up 5.4 percent annually at $95.8 billion. This marks the 11th straight month of annual increases, according to BTS officials.

While the volume decline was steep, there was numerous reasons behind it, including terminal congestion, protracted contract negotiations between the Pacific Maritime Association and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union, and other supply chain-related issues, according to POLA officials.

Truckload rates for the month of January, which measures truckload linehaul rates paid during the month, saw a 7.9 percent annual hike, and intermodal rates dropped 0.3 percent compared to January 2014, which the report pointed out marks the first annual intermodal pricing decline since December 2013.

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2015 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA