CSCMP panel focuses on industry regulations

The subject of regulations was front and center at last week’s Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) Annual Conference in Denver during a session entitled “Planes, Trains, and Automobiles—Regulatory Challenges in Transportation.”

By ·

The impact of regulations is ostensibly a constant them in the freight transportation and logistics sectors, whether a shipper’s core focus is inside or outside the four walls.

The subject of regulations was front and center at last week’s Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) Annual Conference in Denver during a session entitled “Planes, Trains, and Automobiles—Regulatory Challenges in Transportation.”

UPS Vice President Tom Jensen, the session’s moderator noted how myriad regulations have a tangible impact on how freight transportation and logistics services providers treat customers and run their own operations.

The subject of trucking regulations was addressed by James Burnley, a partner at Washington, D.C.-based law firm Venable LLP and former Secretary of Transportation under the late President Ronald Reagan.

“There are very significant changes going on in the trucking industry, which are very important, because they are part of your business and part of your supply chain,” said Burnley.

And one of the most significant changes, according to Burnley, is the new motor carriers Hours-of-Service regulations, which took effect on July 1. Assessing the impact of HOS at this point is too soon in terms of its overall impact and how it could exacerbate the driver shortage as well, while noting that despite its opposition of the rules from many industry groups, it is apparent the new regulations will stick.

Burnley also touched upon CSA, which, he explained, in some cases is flawed.

“If a truck is in an accident without regard to fault, that goes into the database,” he said. “If a driver is distracted at a red light and hits somebody, that goes in. If a driver gets hit by somebody, that goes in. The industry believes there are some ways to work through this, but there are those on the other side that say it is usually the truck driver that survives an accident so all incidents need to be recorded.”

While many regulations are viewed as hindrances by industry stakeholders, Burnley described the status of the Highway Trust Fund as “one huge cloud” hanging over the federal role in the nation’s highway system.

The main reason for this, he said, is that the dollars coming into it do not support the level of spending.

“We last raised federal fuel taxes 20 years ago and…through last year and beginning in 2008, when it went underwater, the federal government had to transfer $4 billion from the general revenue fund into the Highway Trust Fund just to prop it up and keep current funds going,” he said.

What’s more, one thing agreed on in both sides of the aisle is not to raise the federal fuel tax, as Burnley explained the White House views that as a regressive tax and Republicans don’t want new taxes on anything.

Another issue is the pending expiration of the federal transportation bill, MAP-21, in September 2014, which coupled with the ongoing funding issues related to the Highway Trust Fund, leaves the current predicament without a predictable outcome in sight, explained Burnley.

“There are ideas focused on a federal infrastructure bank and vehicle miles traveled and other alternative [funding] mechanisms that would not replace the HTF but would instead supplement it,” said Burnley. “This is a real crisis, because the states are not in a position to step in and really replace the federal rules. We are all concerned. If you think our infrastructure today is not being properly maintained or improved, then just wait three or four years.”

Peter Gatti, executive vice president of the National Industrial Transportation League, noted that while MAP-21 was a “new” bill it really kept things the same.

Parts of MAP-21 like the two-year study of truck size and weight limits were more of a compromise among lawmakers than anything else, he said, joking that “there is a saying in Washington that if you study something enough it will go away.”

With a finite amount of capital resources available for transportation, Gatti said there needs to be a comprehensive overview in terms of ordering the priorities in which how these resources are spent on infrastructure and making America more competitive.

“The only way to do this is to develop some type of comprehensive plan that deals with freight transportation,” he said. “I am not sure what it will lead to, but that is the premise and we will have to see where that leads.”

MAP-21, said Gatti, essentially kicks the “can down the road,” leaving the door open for how to develop new sources of revenue, with pros and cons in terms of where to go in the next cycle, which begins when MAP-21 expires at the end of September 2014.

“I think we are again going to see a game of political football again in terms of where to bridge that gap in the HTF,” Gatti said. 


About the Author

Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. Contact Jeff Berman

Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Article Topics

CSCMP · HOS · MAP-21 · Trucking · All Topics
Latest Whitepaper
2017 Top 50 3PLs: Investment and Consolidation Maintain Traction
The trend set over the past few years for mergers and acquisitions has hardly subsided, and a fresh injection of equity investment is transforming the marketplace. At the same time, shippers may expect to see 3PLs continue to purchase high-tech “solutions” and hire young professionals for implementation.
Download Today!
From the August 2017 Logistics Management Magazine Issue
Which carriers, third-party logistics providers, and North American ports have crossed the service excellence finish line ahead of their competitors? Our readers have cast their votes, and now it’s time to introduce this year’s winners of the coveted Quest for Quality Awards.
BMW Takes the Inland Road to Efficiency
Global Logistics: No Shortcuts to Security
View More From this Issue
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Sign up today to receive our FREE, weekly email newsletter!
Latest Webcast
Getting the most out of your 3PL relationship
Join Evan Armstrong, president of Armstrong & Associates, as he explains how creating a balanced portfolio of "Top 50" global and domestic partners can maximize efficiency and mitigate risk.
Register Today!
EDITORS' PICKS
34th Annual Quest for Quality Awards: Winners Revealed
Which carriers, third-party logistics providers, and North American ports have crossed the service...
2017 Salary Survey: Fresh Voices Express Optimism
Our “33rd Annual Salary Survey” reflects more diversity entering the logistics management...

LM Exclusive: Major Modes Join E-commerce Mix
While last mile carriers receive much of the attention, the traditional modal heavyweights are in...
ASEAN Logistics: Building Collectively
While most of the world withdraws inward, Southeast Asia is practicing effective cooperation between...