Durable goods orders drop 3.6 percent in April, according to Department of Commerce

With freight volumes moderating in recent weeks and demand seeing a mild decline, the United States Department of Commerce reported today that new orders for manufactured durable goods in April dipped 3.6 percent—or $7.1 billion—to $189.9 billion.

By ·

With freight volumes moderating in recent weeks and demand seeing a mild decline, the United States Department of Commerce reported today that new orders for manufactured durable goods in April dipped 3.6 percent—or $7.1 billion—to $189.9 billion.

This marks the second time in the last three months that new orders have been down. March was up 4.4 percent.

April shipments of manufactured goods fell for the first time in five months, decreasing 1.0 percent—or $2.0 billion—to $194.9 million, according to Commerce. This followed a 3.1 percent gain in March.

The decreases in orders and shipments are consistent with what is happening with current freight trends to a large degree. Industry analysts point out that there was a downturn in freight demand from March to April even though overall freight levels are still showing growth.

And as LM has reported, a good amount of this growth stems from a very strong manufacturing sector, which has shown expansion for 23 straight months, according to the Institute for Supply Management.

“We are seeing steady growth for the most part,” a metals shipper said in an interview. “It is not great compared to what we have seen in the past, but it is clear that demand for goods is intact.”

This sentiment is being highlighted in recent earnings reports and advisories from myriad logistics and freight transportation service providers, too. These providers have been cautious about adding capacity until they see more consistent and steady signs of demand over a prolonged period.

Should oil and diesel prices continue to inch down, as has been the trend in recent weeks, it could serve as a driver for increased demand and orders.


About the Author

Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. Contact Jeff Berman

Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Latest Whitepaper
How Lean is your Lean Quality Program?
Avoid quality program bureaucracy that can sap logistics productivity and increase costs
Download Today!
From the September 2016 Issue
Indecision revolving around three complex supply chain elements—transportation, technology and organizational structure—finds many companies waiting to commit to a strategic path. However, waiting too long will only result in a competitive disadvantage that will be difficult to overcome in today’s fast-paced, global economy.
Time for Asia’s ports to rebuild
Is the freight recession upon us…again?
View More From this Issue
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Sign up today to receive our FREE, weekly email newsletter!
Latest Webcast
Supply Chain Best Practices: Visibility to In-Transit Inventory
During this webcast you'll learn on how various organizations have gained instant access to in-transit parcels and given access to this information to stakeholders.
Register Today!
EDITORS' PICKS
25th Annual Masters of Logistics
Indecision revolving around three complex supply chain elements—transportation, technology and...
2016 Quest for Quality: Winners Take the Spotlight
Which carriers, third-party logistics providers and U.S. ports have crossed the service-excellence...

Regional ports concentrate on growth and connectivity
With the Panama Canal expansion complete, ocean cargo gateways in the Caribbean are investing to...
Digital Reality Check
Just how close are we to the ideal digital supply network? Not as close as we might like to think....