Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


FTR Shippers’ Condition Index at lowest level since 2004

By Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
April 14, 2011

As various factors such as increasing diesel prices, tight capacity, and rate pressure continue to take hold in the freight transportation market, they appear to be taking a toll on shippers, according to the April edition of the Shippers’ Condition Index (SCI) released this week by freight transportation consultancy FTR Associates.

The SCI’s current reading of -7.7 indicates what the firm described as “continued deterioration,” with the outlook for capacity shortages getting worse. FTR bases the SCI on “all market influences that affect shippers,” with a reading of zero reflecting a solid environment and anything below zero an unfavorable environment.

FTR officials said that the SCI is approaching levels that have not been seen since 2004, which was a difficult time for shippers. They added that shippers are currently feeling the impact of tighter capacity, with base rates for major modes—and their respective fuel surcharges—on the rise, adding that while they may see relief on fuel surcharges later in the year base rates are likely to continue heading up.

In an interview with LM, FTR Senior Consultant Larry Gross said that what is currently happening when it comes to rates is essentially a carrier—or supplier—market.

“There is no question about that, but it is not being done in a vindictive way,” said Gross. “This is just the way supply and demand works, and right now we are going to go into a period of tight supply, which means that pressure is going to be on the shippers.”

And with driver ability being the true key to capacity and the situation continues to tighten, Gross explained that carriers are going to be looking “very differently” at shippers that provide them the opportunity to make good use of their drivers compared to shipper customers that don’t make good use of drivers.

An example of the latter would be a shipper that experiences routine delays or has shipments tied up at loading dock, which from a carrier’s standpoint is undesirable and waste drivers’ time.

“That type of shipper is going to find it a whole lot more difficult to get capacity, and it will get more expense for them to get freight moved, with carriers becoming more discriminating,” said Gross. “Shippers are not helpless here; they can do things that are going to help them during this tight capacity situation.”

For related articles, please click here.

About the Author

Jeff Berman headshot
Jeff Berman
Group News Editor

Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

February manufacturing data issued today by the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) dipped slightly compared to January, according to the most recent edition of the organization’s Manufacturing Report on Business.

As U.S. West Coast ports begin to address their critical congestion issues, an innovative approach is being launched at San Pedro Bay.

The ongoing financial travails of the Highway Trust Fund was made clear in a position paper recently issued by Jeff Davis, senior fellow at the Eno Center for Transportation. In the paper–entitled “Why Not A Ten-Year Surface Transportation Bill?”-Davis points to past federal transportation bills, as well as the White House’s GROW AMERICA proposal as having one fatal flaw in common: they each leave the HTF on worst financial shape after the bill expires than it was prior to the bill being enacted.

Working with research partner, The Economist Intelligence Unit, the IBM Institute for Business Value surveyed 1,023 global procurement executives from 41 countries in North America, Europe and Asia.

U.S. Carloads were down 7.8 percent annually at 259,544, and intermodal volume was off 15.7 percent for the week ending February 21 at 213,617 containers and trailers.

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2015 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA