Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


Global logistics: ITF study examines impacts of economy and emissions on global trade

image
By Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
June 10, 2010

While the economy is slowly showing signs of bouncing back, its uneven recovery throughout the world has myriad impacts on global trade patterns, commodity flows, and subsequently freight transport flows, according to the findings of a recent research report from the International Transport Forum.

But perhaps the biggest takeaway in the report, entitled “Transport Outlook 2010: The Potential for Innovation,” is a wide-ranging look at the management of future greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from transport, which comes to the conclusion that “technologies to improve fuel economy and ultimately transform the energy basis of transport are the key, as there are very strong upward pressures on demand volumes.”

This is not to say that demand management in transport is unjustified or does not contribute at all to GHG abatement, according to the report’s authors. Instead, they note that its potential is limited so that technological improvement is at the core of climate change policy in the transport sector.

And while the economic shocks of 2008 had a bigger impact on global trade than previous crises, and global trade appears heading back to pre-crisis levels, the report explains that the “geographical fragmentation” of production processes has had a major impact on trade and has been facilitated by good and cheap transport.

What’s more, the report indicates that while globalization of production has been facilitated by transport and intensified the volatility of trade and transport flows, with transport being increasingly exposed to macroeconomic risk. And with transportation rates down and volumes down on an absolute basis, too, the report suggests that heavily-oriented export oriented economies should endeavor for a growth strategy more geared towards domestic demand.

This concept has varying takeaways for shippers, according to ITF Secretary General Jack Short. In an interview with LM, Short explained that shippers respond to consumer demand, satisfying it at the lowest possible cost.

“In that sense they do not strive for any particular growth strategy, and they should not be expected to,” said Short. “‘Rebalancing’ global growth is more a matter for policy-makers, that should be creating the right macroeconomic conditions—for instance by ensuring that credits are available, that exchange rates reflect economic realities and, in transport,  by setting the rules of the games in such a way that we are getting the prices right.”

These framework conditions, said Short, will affect consumer demand, and thereby indirectly affect production and transport choices, with more informed prices for transport services leading to different choices. But he cautioned that no major changes should not be expected, however, as modifying transport prices alone is not going to lead to a major shift in global production and trade patterns.

And assuming the economy continues its gradual recovery—with subsequent increases in trade volumes—Short said it is hard to say if demand management policies could meaningfully stabilize CO2 emissions.

“Demand management is to a considerable extent about setting the right prices, in passenger travel as well as in freight transport,” explained Short. “Prices are among the levers to manage congestion, air pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions.  But policies to influence prices need to be accompanied by supply side choices.”

To illustrate his point, Short said there is not much point in making commuting by car more expensive, if no alternatives are provided that actually allow people to leave their car at home and use some other form of transport. And while such policy packages do change people’s behavior, Short is skeptical as to whether they’re sufficient to stabilize emissions of CO2.

“On a global level, the positive effects are overwhelmed by increased demand triggered by growing incomes and growing populations,” he noted. “It is difficult to imagine how demand management could stabilize emission globally except through unduly restrictive measures.”

About the Author

Jeff Berman headshot
Jeff Berman
Group News Editor

Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Total POLB volumes dropped 9.1 percent in August at 573,083 TEU, and POLA volumes in August were up 6.7 percent compared to August 2013 at 757,702 TEU.

Following a week in which the average price per gallon was flat, diesel prices resumed their decline, falling 1.3 cents to $3.801 per gallon, according to the Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration.

Read how others are using Business Process Modeling to implement Microsoft Dynamics AX with reduced risk.

While diesel prices have largely been out of the spotlight in 2014, freight transportation and logistics stakeholders always need to keep a close eye on what prices are doing, as it has a significant impact on transportation budgets and forecasting.

Railroad service issues and rates, which many rail shippers deem as unreasonable, are front and center in a piece of legislation to be introduced soon by Senators Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) and John Thune (R-SD), chairman and ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce Science and Transportation.

Article Topics

News · All topics

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2013 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA