Intermec research: Mobile technology could save companies an average of $460,000 annually
As many as 39% of transport and logistics companies may be missing out on cost savings by not undergoing process re-engineering.
Latest NewsState of Logistics 2016: Pursue mutual benefit U.S.-NAFTA freight sees 10 percent annual decrease in July, reports BTS AAR reports annual declines for week ending September 17 How Lean is your Lean Quality Program? How Mexico has emerged as the new nearshore destination More News
Latest ResourceHow Lean is your Lean Quality Program? Avoid quality program bureaucracy that can sap logistics productivity and increase costs
A recent survey conducted by Intermec revealed that transport and logistics companies could save approximately $459,000 annually as a result of process re-engineering and the implementation of mobile technology across workflows—but a significant proportion of companies may be missing out on these potential savings.
The survey reveals that more than one in three (39%) companies have not initiated re-engineering efforts in the past year, and of these companies, nearly three quarters (72%) have not evaluated their existing processes for at least two years.
With customers demanding same-day delivery services, transport and logistics managers have identified operational efficiency as their number one area needing improvement this year, and 44% of companies believe reviewing current workflows and technologies (process re-engineering) is the most effective means of achieving that.
Key to improving operations is the deployment of mobile, location-based technology, an area where managers believe savings of more than $282,000 can be achieved in the next 12 months. However, almost a quarter (23%) of the companies surveyed have yet to deploy location-based technology, citing a number of barriers including lack of need and cost, which is preventing them from capitalizing on these benefits.
“Deploying mobile technology for pick-ups and deliveries has long been seen as a way to improve efficiency and reduce costs, and these findings prove that point emphatically. Ignoring process change simply isn’t a long term option,” said Jeff Sibio, Intermec Industry Director for Transport and Logistics.
● Managers see broadband mobile communications such as 4G and LTE as the single biggest future driver of ROI (60%) followed by integrated vehicle telematics (44%) and RFID (38%).
● But those who have not deployed new technologies through process re-engineering remain significant. Of those who have not automated processes, nearly 40% cite a lack of business need and 33% attribute cost as the key reasons for not doing so.
● Consequently, the survey finds that 60% of organizations still use paper-based systems to complete tasks associated with pick-up and delivery, and 9% have plans to deploy paper in some form in 2013.
Demanding greater accuracy
● When asked to rank the demands received from their customers, 77% of managers claim that accuracy of service is the biggest pressure point.
● Nearly a quarter (24%) of companies add that improved accessibility of data in back office systems is the area most in need of improvement, followed by an increased amount of detail (23%) and greater accuracy (22%).
“We can see from this research that deploying technology is not just a cost-saving initiative, it’s increasingly essential to maintain new higher levels of service to keep customers happy,” said Sibio. “One additional validation we are receiving is that the end customer is different and many transportation organizations are scrambling to meet the evolving needs of these new decision makers. Many factors need to be considered, but through a thorough process review, companies can quickly find the solution that will elevate their operations to the next level.”
Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!
Time for Asia’s ports to rebuild Is the freight recession upon us…again? View More From this Issue