Linking Supply Chain Transformation to the Profit and Loss Statement
This document is intended for use as a decision framework for supply chain transformations that yield positive net contribution to the company's bottom line.
in the NewsISM Semiannual report points to growth for both non-manufacturing and manufacturing through 2017 ISM Semiannual report provides optimism for both non-manufacturing and manufacturing through 2017 “Digitization” of ocean cargo industry continues to gain traction JDA releases Digital Supply Chain For Dummies book Cross Border 2017: Managing Your Supply Chain for Efficient and Secure Crossings More News
Aberdeen Group’s Chief Supply Chain Officer (CSCO) Survey (January 2011) collected data from 191 companies of which 56 claim to have active C-level support for supply chain process/technology investments. Findings from that survey were shared at Aberdeen’s Supply Chain summit (March, 2011) and indicate that globalization is driving change and transformation across virtually every process step of the inbound-to-outbound supply chain for companies of all sizes and industry segments.
This Analyst Insight will explore how the 56 companies with active C-level involvement are approaching the global expansion of their supply chains relative to their peers. It will examine the improvement areas addressed by these C-level Supply Chain Executives.
This examination will trace 21key inbound-to-outbound process steps through a process hierarchy and link these actions to the benefits they yield to the company profit and loss statement, balance sheet and cash flow statement. This document demonstrates the types of capabilities that companies are leveraging and highlights case studies and business results.
Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!
Transportation Trends and Best Practices: The Battle for the Last Mile 2017 Technology Roundtable: Are we closer to “Intelligent” Logistics? View More From this Issue