Maersk promises on-time delivery
So-called “phantom bookings,” may be countered with a surcharge to compensate for lost revenue on any given voyage
in the NewsState of Logistics 2016: Pursue mutual benefit June and year-to-date intermodal volumes see over all declines, reports IANA Cass and Avondale data highlights declining truckload and intermodal rates NYK is latest ocean carrier to opt for INTTRA’s eVGM Service Peak Season dynamics continue to see changes More News
Following its promise to be more collaborative with shippers, Maersk Line is introducing a time-definite service in the booming Asia-EU trade lane.
“A daily service between Asia and North Europe with reliable on-time delivery will change liner shipping forever,” spokesmen in Copenhagen declared. “Up until now, customers have had to adjust their production schedules and supply chains to accommodate shipping lines’ unreliability, as they have never been able to trust that their cargo would be on time.”
This will be thing of the past, Maersk promised, noting that the engine behind Daily Maersk is 70 vessels operating a daily sailings between four ports in Asia (Ningbo, Shanghai, Yantian and Tanjung Pelepas) and three ports in Europe (Felixstowe, Rotterdam and Bremerhaven) in what amounts to a giant “ocean conveyor belt” in the carrier’s busiest global service.
In a speech given last June at a major EU logistics event, Maersk Line CEO, Eivind Kolding said the container shipping industry stands on the brink of an “era-defining moment” as it faces fundamental challenges. He added that if container the shipping industry is to secure its right to operate in the future, the industry needs to change now.??
This latest announcement seems to reflect that attitude, said analysts. Zim Line has been ramping up its premium service in the trade lane, as well.
At the same time, however, Maersk and other carriers may soon be holding shippers accountable for freight that is promised, but does not appear. So-called “phantom bookings,” may be countered with a surcharge to compensate for lost revenue on any given voyage.
This, said one analyst, must be exercised with caution:
“Maersk has every right to demand such an arrangement,” said Charles Clowdis, Jr., managing director-transportation advisory services, at IHS Global Insight. “But until capacity is controlled or withdrawn, it’s going to be tough to enforce.”
About the AuthorPatrick Burnson, Executive Editor Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at [email protected]
Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!
2016 State of Logistics: Third-party logistics 2016 State of Logistics: Ocean freight View More From this Issue