Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


New energy resources must be explored says API

Analysts also agree that key to any economic rebound will be the price of fuel
By Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
December 03, 2010

The nation’s supply chain may be at risk if new sources of energy are not tapped in the near future, said the American Petroleum Institute (API).

According to API’s President and CEO Jack Gerard, the Obama Administration’s position of domestic offshore drilling is untenable and risky.

“This reversal on new lease sales off America’s coasts comes on top of a de facto moratorium, which has all but stopped new drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.”

Gerard also warned that the administration’s decision could result in the loss of American jobs, billions less in government revenues and an increasing dependence on foreign energy sources.

Analysts also agree that key to any economic rebound will be the price of fuel. Derik Andreoli, an energy analyst and doctoral candidate at the University of Washington, said there is deep uncertainty in how energy for power, heat, and mobility will be sourced, and how it will be paid for.

“The potential consequences of failing to plan for the unfolding energy paradigm could be catastrophic,” he said.

At the same time, said Andreoli, shippers must address energy-related risks to supply chains and the increasing vulnerability of just-in-time models reliant energy constantly available throughout the supply chain.

“On my radar, the hot topic at the current moment is China’s diesel shortage and how an increase in demand for diesel imports will impact prices through the rest of the year and into 2011,” he said. “It is unclear whether the diesel shortage will reverse in the spring.”

What we do know, said Andreoli, is that refined oil stocks of China’s two largest oil companies have fallen for eight consecutive months and diesel stocks fell by double digits in December alone.

Analysts also expect that the crude and diesel markets will remain volatile, because the recession and the temporary drop in the price of crude caused some investments to be put on hold.

“Crude production peaked in 2006, and net oil exports declined for a variety of reason between 2005 and 2009,” said Andreoli. At the same time, consumption is rising in China.”

About the Author

image
Patrick Burnson
Executive Editor

Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

The questions for the most recent Semiannual Economic Forecast, which was released last week, included: 1-has the strength of the U.S. dollar had a negative, negligible or positive impact on their organization’s profits?; 2-has the net impact of the depressed prices of oil and related commodities been negative, negligible, or positive for their organization’s profits; and 3-how would they characterize the combined impact of their organization’s profits on the strength of the U.S. dollar and the depressed prices of oil and related commodities.

The Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) reported this week that that U.S. trade with its North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) partners Canada and Mexico dropped 5.8 percent on an annual basis in March to $90.5 billion.

Shippers sourcing their goods out the Port of Oakland’s largest marine terminal will soon need to make an appointment drayage providers before their cargo is released.

U.S. Carloads fell 10.6 percent at 244,290, and intermodal containers and trailers were off 6.5 percent at 262,693.

Now that the deal, which had to clear several regulatory hurdles in multiple countries, is official, FedEx executives were able to speak a little bit more freely, albeit being somewhat guarded in regards to certain integration specifics at the same time.

Article Topics

News · Supply Chain · China · Exports · Imports · All topics

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2016 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA