Norfolk Southern posts strong 3Q 2010 earnings
As has been the case during third quarter earnings, Class I railroad earnings continued to deliver strong results, with Norfolk Southern’s strong earnings results bearing that out. Earnings for the Norfolk, Virginia-based carrier at $445 million were up 47 percent year-over-year. And earnings per share of $1.19 were also up 47 percent, beating Wall Street estimates of $1.09.
in the NewsState of Logistics 2016: Pursue mutual benefit Future of domestic manufacturing and transportation infrastructure go hand in hand Vanderlande appoints Remo Brunschwiler as new CEO Diesel prices fall for first time in seven weeks, reports EIA Equipment Leasing and Finance Association Announces Top 10 Equipment Acquisition Trends for 2017 More News
As has been the case during third quarter earnings, Class I railroad earnings continued to deliver strong results, with Norfolk Southern’s strong earnings results bearing that out.
Earnings for the Norfolk, Virginia-based carrier at $445 million were up 47 percent year-over-year. And earnings per share of $1.19 were also up 47 percent, beating Wall Street estimates of $1.09.
Quarterly revenue of $2.5 billion was up 19 percent, benefitting from a 15 percent annual volume increase (and 2 percent from the second quarter), the fifth straight quarter of volume growth. And income from railway operations was up 33 percent to $476 million. Norfolk Southern’s operating ratio improved 3.2 percent to 69.6 percent.
On an earnings conference call, NS CEO Wick Moorman recalled how in the second quarter of this year he was optimistic that the momentum NS generated in the first half of the year would continue into the third quarter.
“I am pleased to report momentum has remained strong as NS has delivered double-digit increases in revenue, income, and bottom-line results,” said Moorman. “Against this [difficult] economic backdrop, we continue to improve productivity as we safely handle increasing traffic levels. While experiencing significant traffic volume swings over the last two years, our systems continue to provide us with increased flexibility and service consistency with respect to our operating plans.”
Looking at volumes for specific industry verticals, coal loadings at 402,700 were up 12.8 percent. General merchandise at 587,700 carloadings was up 9.7 percent, and intermodal at 1, 752,600 was up 13.3 percent.
Intermodal continues to be a major sweet spot for Class I railroads, and Norfolk Southern is no exception in that regard. In the third quarter, it officially rolled out Heartland Corridor, which Moorman said represents the shortest, most direct, double-stacked intermodal route, linking the Port of Hampton to the Midwest.
Absent from the earnings call was any commentary on pricing for the third quarter.
A research note from Tony Hatch, principal of New York-based ABH Consulting stated that NS had 60 percent of 2011 contracts locked in that their target levels of “rail inflation plus,” which he said equates to 3-to-4 percent price increases.
About the AuthorJeff Berman, Group News Editor Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. Contact Jeff Berman
Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!
Transportation of freight in containers was first recorded around 1780 to move coal along England’s Bridgewater Canal. However, "modern" intermodal rail service by a major U.S. railroad only dates back to 1936. Malcom McLean’s Sea-Land Service significantly advanced intermodalism, showing how freight could be loaded into a “container” and moved by two or more modes economically and conveniently. As with all new technologies, there were problems that slowed the growth, which influenced many potential customers to shy away from moving intermodal.
Click here to download
Moore on Pricing: The other TMS functional options 2017 Rate Outlook: Where are freight transportation rates headed? View More From this Issue