LM    Topics 

One more thing about the winter


OK, so this past winter was brutal. That may go down as the understatement of the year. We have written about it a bunch on this site and in print––and for good reason.

The impact the winter had on freight transportation and logistics operations is well-documented, too, what with making it harder for shippers to secure capacity, especially over the road, as well as railroad-related service issues, among other issues.

But when it comes to how the harsh winter weather impacted manufacturing and non-manufacturing operations, it was not nearly as dire as it was for freight transportation and logistics, according to the Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) Spring 2014 Semiannual Economic Forecast that was issued earlier this month.

In each ISM Semiannual Economic Forecast, a “special question” is included for both its manufacturing and non-manufacturing member respondents. The Spring 2014 question was along the lines of whether or not there was an impact on their businesses (specifically new orders, production, and employment for manufacturing and new orders business activity, and employment for non-manufacturing) and, if so, whether those impacts were short-term (to be made up in the balance of 2014) or long-term (impact having a lasting effect on the whole year).

Looking at the feedback for this question in the report, I initially expected a much different response than what the data indicated.

For manufacturing, on the new orders side, 51.3 percent of the panel said there was no impact, with 34.2 percent citing a short-term impact, 6 percent long-term, and 8.5 percent unsure. The report added that for manufacturing production, 52.8 percent of respondents indicated no impact, 34.2 percent indicated that the impact was short-term, 7.5 percent indicated that the impact was long-term, and 5.5 percent were unsure of the extent of the impact. And for employment, 78.5 percent of respondents indicated no impact, 12.5 percent indicated that the impact was short-term, 3 percent indicated that the impact was long-term, and 6 percent were unsure of the extent of the impact.

As for non-manufacturing, for new orders, 58 percent of respondents indicated no impact, 26.4 percent indicated that the impact was short-term, 6.3 percent indicated that the impact was long-term, and 9.2 percent were unsure of the extent of the impact. For Business Activity, 57.1 percent of respondents indicated no impact, 32.6 percent indicated that the impact was short-term, 5.7 percent indicated that the impact was long-term, and 4.6 percent were unsure of the extent of the impact. Finally, for Employment, 81.7 percent of respondents indicated no impact, 9.7 percent indicated that the impact was short-term, 2.3 percent indicated that the impact was long-term, and 6.3 percent were unsure of the extent of the impact.

So, looking at that feedback, the general consensus could be something like: “take that, winter!” Grin. As I previously mentioned, I mistakenly assumed that the impact would be far more severe. In my own defense, living through this past winter in Maine was not a cause for celebration (summer is a different story fortunately!).

Brad Holcomb, chair of the ISM Manufacturing Survey Business Committee, told me that he anecdotally heard about 40 percent of publicly traded companies pointed to weather as a drag on their first quarter earnings reports, which saw pundits labeling bad weather as an “excuse” for poor performance.

“We saw with the data that the winter’s impact was not that severe,” he said. “It was difficult, of course, but it is over now and companies are back on track.”

Tony Nieves, chair of the ISM’s Non-Manufacturing Business Survey Committee, agreed with Holcomb, explaining that while the weather had some impact in the first two months of the year, once there was a break in the weather things got back to business as usual.

“It was definitely a speed bump but not a crash,” he said.

The fact that Old Man winter did not beat down overall throughput for ISM members is a good thing. Even with some of the challenges it presented for nearly everyone, they were able to work through it and persevere, which is a good thing. Will things be as smooth the next time winter rears its ugly head? Only time will tell.


Article Topics

Blogs
ISM
   All topics

Latest in Logistics

Shipment and expenditure decreases trend down, notes Cass Freight Index
March trucking tonnage trends down, reports ATA
FTR Shippers Conditions Index enters negative territory
DAT March Truckload Volume Index sees modest March gains
National diesel average, for week of April 22, is down for the second straight week
UPS reports first quarter earnings decline
LM Podcast Series: Assessing the freight transportation and logistics markets with Tom Nightingale, AFS Logistics
More Logistics

About the Author

Jeff Berman's avatar
Jeff Berman
Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review and is a contributor to Robotics 24/7. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis.
Follow Modern Materials Handling on FaceBook

Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine

Subscribe today!
Not a subscriber? Sign up today!
Subscribe today. It's FREE.
Find out what the world's most innovative companies are doing to improve productivity in their plants and distribution centers.
Start your FREE subscription today.

April 2023 Logistics Management

April 9, 2024 · Our latest Peerless Research Group (PRG) survey reveals current salary trends, career satisfaction rates, and shifting job priorities for individuals working in logistics and supply chain management. Here are all of the findings—and a few surprises.

Latest Resources

Warehouse/DC Automation & Technology: Time to gain a competitive advantage
In our latest Special Digital Issue, Logistics Management has curated several feature stories that neatly encapsulate the rise of the automated systems and related technologies that are revolutionizing how warehouse and DC operations work.
The Ultimate WMS Checklist: Find the Perfect Fit
Reverse Logistics: Best Practices for Efficient Distribution Center Returns
More resources

Latest Resources

2024 Transportation Rate Outlook: More of the same?
2024 Transportation Rate Outlook: More of the same?
Get ahead of the game with our panel of analysts, discussing freight transportation rates and capacity fluctuations for the coming year. Join...
Bypassing the Bottleneck: Solutions for Avoiding Freight Congestion at the U.S.-Mexico Border
Bypassing the Bottleneck: Solutions for Avoiding Freight Congestion at the U.S.-Mexico Border
Find out how you can navigate this congestion more effectively with new strategies that can help your business avoid delays, optimize operations,...

Driving ROI with Better Routing, Scheduling and Fleet Management
Driving ROI with Better Routing, Scheduling and Fleet Management
Improve efficiency and drive ROI with better vehicle routing, scheduling and fleet management solutions. Download our report to find out how.
Your Road Guide to Worry-Free Shipping Between the U.S. and Canada
Your Road Guide to Worry-Free Shipping Between the U.S. and Canada
Get expert guidance and best practices to help you navigate the cross-border shipping process with ease. Download our free white paper today!
Warehouse/DC Automation & Technology: It’s “go time” for investment
Warehouse/DC Automation & Technology: It’s “go time” for investment
In our latest Special Digital Issue, Logistics Management has curated several feature stories that neatly encapsulate the rise of automated systems and...