Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


Port of San Francisco enhances its Foreign Trade Zone

While San Francisco’s waterfront cargo operations are dwarfed by neighboring Oakland, it remains a viable “niche” gateway
By Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
March 16, 2012

The U.S. Department of Commerce recently approved the Port of San Francisco’s request for reorganizing its Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ) #3 under the new Alternative Site Framework (ASF) program.

According to port spokesmen, this a more efficient process that requires less paperwork and streamlines the process for businesses to apply for a zone.

The program allows existing companies and new companies in San Francisco and San Mateo counties to secure FTZ status within approximately 30 days from when an application is accepted.  Without the program the process can take 8-12 months.

While San Francisco’s waterfront cargo operations are dwarfed by neighboring Oakland, it remains a viable “niche” gateway. Late last year, Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood announced that the port would be awarded $2.97 million for rail improvements aimed at improving segments of its freight rail track in order to enhance safety, livability, and economic development.

A Foreign Trade Zone is a secured area in a designated customs “port of entry,”  and while physically located within the U.S. it is considered outside U.S. Customs territory. This allows for foreign goods to be
brought into FTZs without formal customs entry for manufacturing, testing, assembly, processing, storage, and distribution.  Duty payments on imported goods and materials can be reduced or eliminated, or deferred until they leave the designated area and enter U.S. commerce.

Goods not entering U.S. commerce, for instance re-exports, are not obligated to pay customs duties.

The Alternative Site Framework program expands upon the benefits already granted within the FTZ program in an efficient way.  Companies have the advantage to extend the FTZ benefits to their own already existing manufacturing, processing and distribution locations within San Francisco and San Mateo counties, yet outside of the Port of San Francisco.

“The new expedient process gives San Francisco and San Mateo companies a competitive advantage, especially when competing on a global scale,” said Peter Dailey, Maritime Director for the Port of San Francisco, grantee of FTZ #3.  “Foreign Trade Zones are one tool to reduce logistics costs, which translates into savings to a company’s bottom line.  More competitive companies translate into new economic opportunities and help create new jobs.”

About the Author

image
Patrick Burnson
Executive Editor

Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Working with research partner, The Economist Intelligence Unit, the IBM Institute for Business Value surveyed 1,023 global procurement executives from 41 countries in North America, Europe and Asia.

U.S. Carloads were down 7.8 percent annually at 259,544, and intermodal volume was off 15.7 percent for the week ending February 21 at 213,617 containers and trailers.

The Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Logistics (BTS) reported this week that U.S. trade with its North America Free Trade Agreement partners Canada and Mexico in December 2014 was up 5.4 percent annually at $95.8 billion. This marks the 11th straight month of annual increases, according to BTS officials.

While the volume decline was steep, there was numerous reasons behind it, including terminal congestion, protracted contract negotiations between the Pacific Maritime Association and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union, and other supply chain-related issues, according to POLA officials.

Truckload rates for the month of January, which measures truckload linehaul rates paid during the month, saw a 7.9 percent annual hike, and intermodal rates dropped 0.3 percent compared to January 2014, which the report pointed out marks the first annual intermodal pricing decline since December 2013.

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2015 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA