Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


Procurement risk management:  What it takes to be a leader

Risk is part of business. It’s a significant, permanent reality faced by virtually every organization. Without risk, business as we know it might not exist. To compete, grow, and capture benefit, companies need to take chances. It’s what businesses do.
By Mark Pearson
October 14, 2010

Risk is part of business. It’s a significant, permanent reality faced by virtually every organization. Without risk, business as we know it might not exist. To compete, grow, and capture benefit, companies need to take chances. It’s what businesses do.

Still, the risk environment is different in the 21st century. According to a 2009 Accenture Study, seven out of 10 companies acknowledge that business risk has grown due to financial stresses, and corporate buyers in almost all industries have seen risk incidents, factors, and consequences increase significantly.

In recent years, procurement has become a frequent topic in the risk management conversation. Given the variety and impact of procurement risks (see graphic), it’s not surprising that such concerns are increasing. However, Accenture has observed that few companies are translating their trepidations into formal procurement risk management capabilities. To find out why—and to launch a dialog about what companies might do differently—we undertook a procurement risk management research study. The effort’s primary mission was to discover what high performers (leaders) in procurement risk management do differently than other companies.

First, we found that compared to survey respondents as a whole, procurement’s high performers are more apt to address supplier and price volatility risks when developing their procurement strategies—as opposed to later on. Leaders also excelled at integrating risk management into their category strategies, developing innovative ways to monitor risk, and implementing practices and tools to mitigate risk.
A good example is that leaders frequently apply dual-sourcing and risk-sharing initiatives to anticipate supplier quality risks. To anticipate supplier bankruptcy risks, they also do a great deal of dual sourcing and supplier negotiations.

In addition, a significant disparity was found in the area of risk-sharing clauses and back-to-back contracts—formal agreements stipulating that buyers can share, or even transfer, the cost of unforeseen problems across suppliers or sub-suppliers. Leaders are far more likely than the survey population as a whole to deploy these clauses/contracts.
A second area of note is sourcing. Survey results confirmed that integrating risk management initiatives with a company’s strategic sourcing process (e.g., during supplier evaluation) can help companies procure more effectively.

There are many tools and approaches for controlling procurement risk in this area, including supplier market analyses; current supplier portfolio analyses; supplier audits; supplier scorecards; supplier process failure mode and effects analyses; historic and forecast pricing analyses; and logistical and transportation risk analyses.

Among these, one of the most interesting may be supplier market analysis, an activity that is frequently practiced by procurement leaders. Supply market analysis involves a thorough assessment of supply market industry dynamics, (supply, demand, industry structure, industry profitability, supplier capacity utilization, etc.) in order to anticipate commodity price evolution and potential supply shortages.
Third, procurement risk-management leaders tend to be supplier relationship masters. Not only do they form deep, symbiotic connections with vendors, they work together to rapidly detect risk (e.g., through early warning systems) and neutralize risk-related issues before those issues become incidents. High performers also adapt their supply relationships to specific geographies and cultures.
And fourth, Accenture determined that procurement leaders often benefit from the use of a “risk management framework.” Many such structures are feasible; but what is most important is a comprehensive, end-to-end approach for anticipating, monitoring, and mitigating risk and then applying those activities to the key parts of a procurement organization (e.g., strategy, sourcing and category management, requisition to pay, supplier relationship management and so forth).

This clear segmentation of risk-related processes (anticipate, monitor, mitigate) allows companies to develop formal plans and responses that help whittle down procurement risk’s otherwise daunting impacts. At the anticipation stage, for example, leaders align risk programs with category strategies, make use of risk-sharing clauses, excel at predictive analytics, and apply value engineering concepts to look at alternative materials.

At the monitoring stage, they work closely with select suppliers, design formal supplier relationship management programs, make maximum use of external data sources, and identify and assess the level of risk at key stages of the strategic sourcing process. For mitigation, leaders stand out in the formation of decision processes (e.g., who makes and follows through on a mitigation decision) and the use of formal metrics and measurements.

Chances are good that procurement risks will only continue to grow. However, companies that excel at procurement risk management will, in all likelihood, continue to grow as well.

About the Author

Mark Pearson

Mark Pearson is the managing director of the Accenture’s Supply Chain Management practice. He has worked in supply chain for more than 20 years and has extensive international experience, particularly in Europe, Asia and Russia. Based in Munich, Mark can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

You’ve heard the old saying, it was the best of times, it was the worst of times. Rob Handfield sees this as the best of times for procurement professionals, who have an opportunity to deliver real value to their organizations

While core metrics were down from a very impressive July, the August edition of the Non-Manufacturing Report on Business from the Institute of Supply Management (ISM) was still very strong.

The Clean Cargo Working Group (CCWG) has released a report indicating that in 2014 average CO2 emissions in the global container shipping trades declined 8.4 percent from the year before.

UPS Freight, the less-than-truckload (LTL) subsidiary of UPS, recently announced it has rolled out a new service center facility in Franklin Park, Illinois. This is the company’s fifth Chicago-area service center along with other ones in Aurora, Chicago, Palantine, and South Holland.

Putting the renewed strength in the truckload market into a very positive perspective is a report issued by Avondale Partners analyst Donald Broughton, which was released yesterday. Entitled, “Q2’15 Trucking Capacity; Goldilocks Era Continues,” Broughton explained that in the second quarter only 70 truckload fleets failed, or exited the business. That number may seem high to some, but it is not, especially when you consider that the second quarter of 2014 saw more than five times as many truckload carriers, 375 to be exact, exit the business.

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2015 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA