Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


Report paints a positive but cautious outlook by carriers towards natural gas usage

By Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
August 29, 2012

While fuel prices again have turned to an upward trajectory, more attention continues to be paid to natural gas and how it can potentially be an asset for freight transportation sector stakeholders.

And while natural gas is making inroads as a possible way for shippers and carriers to counter increasing and uncertain energy costs, a recent survey published by Transport Capital Partners and ACT Research shows that there are cautious reasons to be optimistic when gauging future natural gas prospects.

Data for the survey was based on feedback from roughly 100 motor carriers.

Perhaps the most significant finding of the survey is that 51.4 percent of respondents are considering natural gas-fueled trucks when making new truck purchases.

But even though more than 50 percent of respondents indicated that natural gas-powered trucks are a possibility, it by no means suggests that it does not come without some caveats.

The biggest concern among respondents—at 91.4 percent—is fuel station availability, followed by higher vehicle purchase price at 81.9 percent. Two other concerns—each expressed by 50 percent of respondents—were needed product specs/performance and secondary market value, respectively.

On top of those concerns was another survey question which focused on how close carrier operations would a commercial fueling station—for Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) or Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)—need to be for a carrier to consider natural gas fueled vehicles for their next new truck buys.

Slightly less than 20 percent of respondents said 5 miles or less, with 15 percent saying 6-25 miles and another 15 percent indicating 26-100 miles. Rounding out the top 5 were slightly less than 10 percent at 101-200 miles and about 13 percent saying 201-500 miles. 

In an interview with LM, Richard Mikes, a partner at TCP, said that the degree of interest in natural gas-powered trucks by survey respondents was higher than TCP originally anticipated.

And he also explained that a question regarding respondents’ knowledge of natural gas engines in their tractors was somewhat telling.

More than one-third—or about 35 percent of respondents—said they little knowledge, while nearly half—about 45.8 percent—said they had some average knowledge and 20-25 percent said they had above average knowledge.

“The fairly high level of interest compared to degree of knowledge was surprising,” said Mikes.

He pointed out that for carriers with less than $25 million in revenue those will little knowledge of natural gas in tractors was much higher at 70 percent compared to 15 percent of carriers with revenues above $25 million.

“The smaller carriers may not have as much knowledge about it, because they are more focused on day-to-day operations,” he said. “They are smaller staffed and have to do everything and know everything. And they may not have the time…to get into the natural gas arena.

Looking ahead, the survey asked carriers what percentage of their fleets will be fueled by natural gas in five years. 

29 percent said natural gas will account for less than 5 percent of their total fleet, and 27.8 percent said it will represent 16-25 percent of their total fleet, and 19 percent noting it will represent 6-15 percent of their total fleet.

As diesel prices continue to pick up steam, having risen for the last eight weeks and sitting at more than $4 per gallon the last two weeks, natural gas continues to gain traction as a possible fuel alternative for motor carriers.

T. Boone Pickens, founder and chairman of BP Capital Management and perhaps the biggest proponent of natural gas usage for transportation anywhere in the world, has repeatedly explained if the 8 million Class 8 vehicles on the road today in the U.S.  switched from diesel to natural gas, that would represent a reduction of 2.5 million barrels in imported oil per day and cut down on the 35 billion gallons of diesel consumed per day by the trucking industry, with a $1-$2 dollar per gallon decrease, too.

About the Author

Jeff Berman headshot
Jeff Berman
Group News Editor

Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

The Department of Commerce reported that January retail sales were up 0.2 percent compared to December and up 3.7 percent annually at $449.9 billion, and the NRF reported that January retail sales, which exclude automobiles, gas stations, and restaurants, rose 0.6 percent over December and 1.4 percent compared to January 2015.

On the freight shipments side, Cass reported that January shipments––at 1.025––trailed December by 1.3 percent and January 2016 by 0.2 percent. These declines were less than the 4.9 percent drop from November to December, though, and January shipments still topped the 1.0 mark for the 65th straight month in December.

The Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) reported this week that its Freight Transportation Services Index (TSI) saw a 0.4 percent decline from November to December, its second straight decline on the heels of a 1.0 percent decrease from October to November.

Carloads saw a 11.7 percent annual decline at 241,680, and intermodal containers and trailers rose 10.5 percent to 262,830

An amendment to the International Maritime Organization’s Safety of Life at Sea convention will go into effect requiring all shippers (importers and exporters) to certify and submit the Verified Gross Mass – the combined weight of the cargo and the container – to the steamship line and terminal operator in advance of loading the container aboard a vessel.

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2016 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA