Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


Resurgent Port of Jacksonville opposes punitive taxes

According to spokesmen for the Port of Jacksonville, Law 154 could hurt business there, too, in the short-term
By Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
November 11, 2010

Ocean carriers serving the U.S.-Puerto Rico trade may not be the only ones to feel the impact of a discriminatory tax on multinational companies.

According to spokesmen for the Port of Jacksonville, Law 154 could hurt business there, too, in the short-term.

“The worst part about it,” said Raul Alfonso, the port’s senior director, trade development & global marketing, “is that it came out of the blue. We were completely surprised by the move.”

“Fortunately for the port, we have several other vibrant markets to serve.”

In an interview with LM, Alfonso said that the port had double-digit growth in the past fiscal year, and that they are projecting sustainable commercial activity in 2011.

“Naturally,” he said, “the real significant date for us is 2014 when the Panama Canal is widened.”

The Jacksonville Port Authority, also known as JAXPORT, is the independent government agency that owns, operates and controls much of Jacksonville’s Seaport System. According to Alfonso, JAXPORT is determined to differentiate its services by refining logistics.

“We have invested the money in our distribution infrastructure,” he said, “so that we can capture north-south deployments and be ready for increased all-water service via Asia-EU.

Panama Canal expansion is preceded by Hanjin Shipping’s plan to build a new terminal on Dame’s Point. It has reserved 90 acres for their container terminal, which is projected to open during 2013.

Alfonso said that he will following this issue and others raised at the National Industrial Transportation League’s annual meeting in Ft. Lauderdale next week.

“We have a lot be optimistic about,” he said. “And we feel that shippers will help us fight against taxes that hinder trade…no matter where they are enacted.”

About the Author

image
Patrick Burnson
Executive Editor

Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Almost all companies today are aware of their labor or material costs... but what about energy consumption? It all comes down to having the energy data needed to determine what actions you must take to improve. The payoff is worth it, as insight into energy data allows you to make more valuable, relevant operating decisions.

With lower energy prices sparking domestic economic gains, coupled with solid manufacturing and industrial production activity, improving jobs numbers, and a GDP number that shows progress, there is, or there should be, much to be enthused about when it comes to the economy and the economic recovery, which has been raised and discussed and dissected from basically every angle possible, it seems. But that enthusiasm regarding the economy needs to be tempered, because big headline themes seldom tell the full story at all really.

The annualized turnover rate for large truckload carriers in the third quarter rose one percentage point to 97 percent, according to the ATA.

The Pacific Maritime Association (PMA), representing employers at 29 ports, and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU), which represents 20,000 dockworkers, have come to a tentative agreement on a key issue in ongoing contract negotiations.

Diesel prices continued their ongoing decline, with the average price per gallon falling 6.7 cents to $2.866 per gallon, according to data issued this week by the Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration (EIA).

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2013 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA