Shippers caution against “Hunger Games of the Sea”
in the NewsBehind KION Group’s acquisition of Dematic UniCarriers Americas executives partner with Roosevelt University Brexit impact yet to be measured by U.S. logistics managers Rail carload and intermodal volumes fall for the week ending June 18, reports AAR BTS reports U.S.-NAFTA trade falls 3.2 percent in April More News
While U.S. shippers may have been surprised by China’s decision to oppose the P3 Network, there had been rumblings of discontent voiced by their counterparts in Hong Kong for some time.
“Shippers can never be sure whether A P Moller-Maersk, MSC and CMA CGM – the P3 Network carriers – have talked about rates or not,” notes a bulletin issued by the The Hong Kong Shippers Council early last week.
“Shippers are suspicious about whether these shipping lines are just service sharing, or consolidating all the operations,” it adds. “If they have such a big market share, they will easily come up with very unfavorable freight charges; they may even demand double freight rates during the peak seasons.”
According to the association even without “collusion,” freight rates could easily be hiked from the smaller competition pools created by the alliances. Here are two other major points directed to Hong Kong shippers:
*Negative Carrier Alliance Effect on Shippers - Increased Risk
This one is more for larger shippers. Spreading out shipments between different carriers supplies risk mitigation from cargo damage by having their cargo containers on different ships. It’s kind of like the old platitude of not having all your eggs in one basket. With alliances sharing ships, this strategy becomes difficult as the two carriers could easily sail the shipments together.
*Negative Carrier Alliance Effect on Shippers - Additional Fears
These fears include transit times increasing use of transhipment hubs, alliances growing to include feeder services like inland rail from hubs, powerful carriers being able to put pressure on terminal operators, and carriers having increased influence on jobs all across the supply chain. If the carrier alliances were to move forward as planned, it seemed to Hong Kong shippers that it would be inevitable for smaller carriers to be pushed out of the market. They note that the international shipping industry’s freight rates have always been volatile.
Time will tell how all the moves made by the various carriers as they fight for dominance in the “Hunger Games of the Sea,” but there’s plenty of room for speculation now, say shippers in Hong Kong.
About the AuthorPatrick Burnson Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at [email protected]
Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!
WMS Update: What do we need to run a WMS? Supply Chain Software Convergence: Synchronization Realized View More From this Issue