STB holds hearing on commodity and boxcar exemptions

Earlier today, the Surface Transportation Board (STB) held a hearing, entitled “Review of Commodity, Boxcar, and TOFC/COFC Exemptions.” The STB said the objective of the hearing is to review regulatory exemptions for certain types of rail traffic to determine their effectiveness in the marketplace, see whether the rationale behind these exemptions should be revisited, and also if these exemptions should be subject to periodic review.

By ·

At a time when legislation designed to re-regulate and remove antitrust immunity of the freight railroad industry has become commonplace, there is now another regulatory issue regarding railroads being debated.

Earlier today, the Surface Transportation Board (STB) held a hearing, entitled “Review of Commodity, Boxcar, and TOFC/COFC Exemptions.” The STB said the objective of the hearing is to review regulatory exemptions for certain types of rail traffic to determine their effectiveness in the marketplace, see whether the rationale behind these exemptions should be revisited, and also if these exemptions should be subject to periodic review.

It is also examining exemptions from regulation for certain types of rail traffic in which there is significant competition among railroads for customer business, with these exemptions directed by Congress in an effort to remove government regulation, stimulate industry growth, and allow competition to work in the marketplace, according to the Association of American Railroads (AAR)

This hearing follows the recent reintroduction of legislation focused on addressing the concerns of rail shippers, regarding rates and service, as well as making the railroad industry more competitive, and separate legislation centering on bringing the freight rail system under the nation’s anti-trust laws and provided needed protection for various rail customers who have suffered from increased rates and decreased quality of service, according to the bill’s authors.

In comments submitted to the STB, AAR President Edward Hamberger said that today’s rail regulatory policies are the very reason freight railroads are such a critical part of the U.S. economy and vital to our nation’s financial recovery. And he added that changing regulations creates an air of uncertainty that could harm the country’s economic recovery and negate the railroads’ ability to sustain capital infrastructure investments.

“Freeing the railroads from unneeded regulation, the exemptions have led to increased competitiveness, enhanced service offerings, and increased productivity and efficiency, which continue to benefit the customers railroads serve and the public at large,” said Hamberger. “The Nation needs railroads to continue to invest significant private funds to grow and to keep freight on tracks instead of flooding the highways. They will be able to make those investments only if the federal government maintains a consistent, coherent, and transparent regulatory regime that allows railroads and their investors to pursue returns on their enormous investments.”

In testimony submitted by Ford Motor Company, the automotive manufacturer said that while it is not submitting specific issues or concerns for the STB to solve, it instead noted it is interested in hearing the debate of the pros and cons of revoking existing commodity exemptions in the context that doing so may promote competition without constraint and provide for remedies where appropriate.

“The consolidation of railroads over time, combined with the inherent constraints associated with railroad owned infrastructure have resulted in limited opportunity for competition,” said Ford. “And though trucking provides a transportation alternative, it is not a viable economic alternative to rail on balance and we…have a keen interest in ensuring a highly competitive transportation landscape.”

Kirk R. Light, vice president, Logistics, Planning & Transportation, at Houston-based CEMEX Inc. explained in his testimony that the majority of CEMEX’ products in the U.S. not shipped directly to production sites are shipped by rail to distribution centers and subsequently delivered by truck to its customers, with the majority of the company’s rail routes being captive.

Light said that CEMEX is increasingly dependent on rail transportation and seeks the removal of rail commodity exemptions so that fair and reasonable freight rates and service can be maintained as changes in the rail industry, as well as the cement industry, “have significantly reduced transportation alternatives.”

While shippers clamor for changes to improve access to competition, railroads maintain that the existing regulatory railroad environment for has produced—for North American railroad shippers—a freight railroad system that is the best in the world. And if the railroad industry lost the ability to earn its cost of capital it could have a negative effect on capital investments to support traffic growth and reverse the strides made post-Staggers Act in the areas of rail safety and service reliability.

For more stories on railroad shipping, please click here.


About the Author

Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. Contact Jeff Berman

Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Hub Group Resources
Not Your Grandfather's Intermodal
Transportation of freight in containers was first recorded around 1780 to move coal along England’s Bridgewater Canal. However, "modern" intermodal rail service by a major U.S. railroad only dates back to 1936. Malcom McLean’s Sea-Land Service significantly advanced intermodalism, showing how freight could be loaded into a “container” and moved by two or more modes economically and conveniently. As with all new technologies, there were problems that slowed the growth, which influenced many potential customers to shy away from moving intermodal.
Click here to download
Latest Whitepaper
Making the Case for an Integrated Fleet Management Solution
Fleet management technology can drive positive supply chain and business results. Explore this special edition of Making the Case where we lay out the benefits of integrated fleet management technology in your organization.
Download Today!
From the October 2017 Logistics Management Magazine Issue
A leading distributor of professional salon products in the U.S. forms unique partnerships with its key LTLs to lower transport costs, reduce its carbon footprint and improve service to its 565 store locations.
Q4 2017 Rail/Intermodal Roundtable: Improvements apparent; work remains
LM Viewpoint: Collaboration, Now more than ever
View More From this Issue
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Sign up today to receive our FREE, weekly email newsletter!
Latest Webcast
The State of the Rail/Intermodal Markets
In this webinar our panel will discuss the new service challenges facing rail/intermodal providers and offer practical advice for how shippers can keep efficiency high and costs down.
Register Today!
EDITORS' PICKS
SalonCentric: One Beautiful Network
A leading distributor of professional salon products in the U.S. forms unique partnerships with its...
2017 Alliance Awards: Recognizing outstanding supply chain partnerships
In an era where effective supply chain collaboration is both highly valued and elusive, Logistics...

26th Annual Study of Logistics and Transportation Trends: Transportation at Digital Speed
While a majority of companies strongly agree that transportation is a strategically important...
34th Annual Quest for Quality Awards: Winners Revealed
Which carriers, third-party logistics providers, and North American ports have crossed the service...