Study makes case that ERP comes up short for meeting supply chain objectives

A study recently released by GT Nexus, a provider of cloud-based network services for global trade and supply chain management, in conjunction with Supply Chain Insights makes the case that ERP systems may be coming up short, when it comes to providing supply chain visibility for shippers.

By ·

A study recently released by GT Nexus, a provider of cloud-based network services for global trade and supply chain management, in conjunction with Supply Chain Insights makes the case that ERP systems may be coming up short, when it comes to providing supply chain visibility for shippers.

Data for this study was based on feedback from nearly 80 respondents made up of manufacturers, retailers, 3PLs, wholesalers, and distributors, with nearly 60 percent of those respondents serving as heads of supply chain operations for global manufacturers.

The study found that companies dependent on ERP for supply chain visibility are often faced with a 50 percent gap in inter-enterprise visibility capabilities, among other findings, including:

  • 97 percent of companies agreeing on the need for supply chain agility, while only 37 percent are meeting their stated goals;
  • the average importance rating for supply chain visibility across external partners is 82 percent, with confidence in ERP to deliver visibility is low as 60 percent of respondents have confidence in ERP to deliver visibility within the enterprise and 34 percent have confidence in ERP to provide visibility with suppliers and customers;
  • 95 percent of companies agree that supply chain agility is needed, but just 38 percent are meeting stated goals; and
  • supply chain visibility is low and performance levels in the extended supply chain are half of what they are inside the enterprise, with a 54 percent gap between visibility performance within the enterprise versus visibility with suppliers and customers, among others

In an interview with LM, GT Nexus VP of Corporate Marketing Greg Kefer said the study’s findings were in line with what his company expected.

“There were no real surprises,” he said. “There are many companies using ERP as their supply chain system of record, and when you talk about a global supply chain that involves thousands of networks scattered around the world within individual companies, the challenges of connecting those networks in an efficient way to do things like track inventory flows and other supply chain operations just does not work. Those ERP systems were never designed to work across companies, instead they were designed to work for a single company. That was our hypothesis coming in to the study and we saw some of the gaps in terms of what is actually happening so that validated it.”

In addressing the current state of supply chain visibility in terms of importance versus performance, the study found a 50 percent gap for inter-enterprise order management to customers (79 percent citing importance and 29 percent citing performance or what they are getting out of ERP systems in terms of meeting specific needs), a 45 percent gap for first tier material suppliers (83 percent citing importance and 38 percent citing performance), and a 44 percent gap for transportation and logistics network (96 percent citing importance and 53 percent citing performance).

Faring somewhat better were second and third tier suppliers with a 32 percent gap between importance versus performance (50 percent to 18 percent) and manufacturing within company at 22 percent (85 percent to 63 percent).

“When you have a hypothesis that most companies have ERP systems that is the prevailing system of record for operations in corporate America, and support progress within the company but when you go outside the four walls, things break down,” said Kefer.

Related: Most Companies Fail with ERP for Supply Chain Orchestration


About the Author

Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. Contact Jeff Berman

Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Article Topics

Cloud Computing · ERP · GT Nexus · All Topics
Latest Whitepaper
How Lean is your Lean Quality Program?
Avoid quality program bureaucracy that can sap logistics productivity and increase costs
Download Today!
From the September 2016 Issue
Indecision revolving around three complex supply chain elements—transportation, technology and organizational structure—finds many companies waiting to commit to a strategic path. However, waiting too long will only result in a competitive disadvantage that will be difficult to overcome in today’s fast-paced, global economy.
Time for Asia’s ports to rebuild
Is the freight recession upon us…again?
View More From this Issue
Subscribe to Our Email Newsletter
Sign up today to receive our FREE, weekly email newsletter!
Latest Webcast
Supply Chain Best Practices: Visibility to In-Transit Inventory
During this webcast you'll learn on how various organizations have gained instant access to in-transit parcels and given access to this information to stakeholders.
Register Today!
EDITORS' PICKS
25th Annual Masters of Logistics
Indecision revolving around three complex supply chain elements—transportation, technology and...
2016 Quest for Quality: Winners Take the Spotlight
Which carriers, third-party logistics providers and U.S. ports have crossed the service-excellence...

Regional ports concentrate on growth and connectivity
With the Panama Canal expansion complete, ocean cargo gateways in the Caribbean are investing to...
Digital Reality Check
Just how close are we to the ideal digital supply network? Not as close as we might like to think....