Tiananmen Square vs. Red Square
The message seems to be tops-down with leadership and power at the pinnacle and the people at the bottom.
This week I am in Moscow for a conference and a bit of vacation. Overall, I find Moscow to be a bit bleak - miles of low-slung beige and gray block-style buildings reminiscent of the Cold War Soviet government. The exceptions include a small group of new downtown skyscrapers and Red Square.
With my China sourcing consulting business, I have been to Beijing and Tiananmen Square many times but this is the first time I’ve been to Moscow and its famous Red Square. Both cities are heavily industrialized, the seat of their respective governments, and both have famous Squares. So how does Red Square compare to Tiananmen Square?
First, they are both enormous. The Chinese claim that Tiananmen can hold a million people and being there, it seems possible. While not as big, Red Square is quite impressive, with the attached Kremlin grounds and several churches and museums. Both have picturesque historical buildings including the Chinese Forbidden City and the Russian St. Basil’s Cathedral with the colorful onion domes. On the sides of both Squares are the seats of government: The Chinese Communist Party and the Kremlin. Both Squares have remarkable museums with extensive and awesome collections. Both Squares have monuments to workers. Tiananmen has Mao’s Mausoleum and Red Square has Lenin’s Mausoleum.
But the more important thing is that these two Squares were built as places of powerful governments and a show of might and strength. Both Squares are often used for military parades and other official government business. The message seems to be tops-down with leadership and power at the pinnacle and the people at the bottom. You can “feel” this in both places to the point where it is a bit intimidating.
Contrast that with American monuments such as the Washington Mall. The Mall seems to have a totally different feel, more egalitarian, more “Of the People.” Even the White House is surrounded by an open fence, unlike the high walls of the Forbidden City and the Kremlin.
It serves us well to remember and respect these distinctions when we are dealing with global commerce. Most nations of the world maintain tight control over capitalist ventures and international commerce. We need to be aware and sensitive to cultural and governmental differences in our Supply Chain planning and execution.
About the AuthorPatrick Burnson, Executive Editor Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at [email protected]
Subscribe to Logistics Management Magazine!Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!
European Logistics Update: Post-Brexit U.K. moving ahead, but in which direction? Badcock Home Furniture &more: Out with paper, in with Cloud TMS View More From this Issue