Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


UPS and Teamsters come to terms on two new tentative five-year deals

By John D. Schulz, Contributing Editor and Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
April 26, 2013

When it comes to labor negotiations, situations can change quickly for better or worse. In the case of the negotiations between transportation and parcel bellwether UPS and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, it is the former.

UPS said yesterday that it has reached a tentative agreement with the Teamsters on two, new five-year contracts for UPS’s small package and freight (less-than-truckload) business units.

These contracts cover roughly 250,000 UPS and UPS Freight employees, according to Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU).

UPS added that the tentative contracts were hammered out well ahead of their July 31, 2013 expiration date and need to be presented to the UPS Teamsters-represented employees for ratification. When the contracts are officially ratified, UPS said the new agreements would take effect on August 1, adding that the new contracts enable UPS to remain highly competitive, customer-focused, and positioned to deliver transformative technologies growing areas of the company like healthcare logistics and e-commerce on a global basis.

“These agreements are a ‘win-win-win’ for our people, customers and shareholders,” said Scott Davis, UPS chairman and CEO, in a statement. “The fact that we have reached agreements well before our current contracts expire is a testament to the skills and determination of all those involved in these negotiations.”

Another positive development highlighted by Davis was that the company’s labor negotiations with the Teamsters—prior to the announcement regarding the tentative agreements—made significant progress and resolved the most important issues in their labor contract and were optimistic a deal will be reached very soon.

On its Web site, TDU outlined key aspects of the tentative contracts, which include:
-all UPS Teamsters in company health plans being moved to union health plans;
-$1 per hour increases in contributions to pension and healthcare benefits each year, which matches the previous contract; and
-wage increases under the five-year deal are reportedly 70 cents in each of the first three years, followed by raises of 90 cents and $1 in the last two years

Teamsters officials said that the tentative agreement for UPS package employees moves 140,000 employees into the Teamsters-controlled health plans to maintain current strong benefits for all UPS Teamsters and also grow funds for Teamsters for all industries into the future.

The Teamsters also said that for UPS Freight the tentative agreement resolves subcontracting issues by putting all laid-off road drivers back to work, with UPS Freight employees receiving substantial wage increases and lower co-pays for health insurance, coupled with providing the ability for more part-time workers to become full-time employees.

The possibility of this deal coming to fruition was in jeopardy as recent as a few weeks ago, with the Teamsters Union having drawn a line in the sand over health care in labor negotiations with UPS, which floated the idea that the 260,000 Teamsters for the first time make a small co-pay contribution toward their health care premiums.

During a negotiation session in March, Teamsters union President James P. “Jim” Hoffa said a group of Teamsters began chanting, “We won’t pay!!” in a loud display of their opposition to the proposal, adding that it was a non-starter for the union.


Prior to yesterday’s announcement, UPS officials repeatedly declined to negotiate publicly and refuse to discuss any details of their negotiating strategy.
 
Ken Hall, the Teamsters’ general secretary treasurer and the union’s point man for the Teamsters negotiations with UPS, said in March that the talks were tough but that was not a surprise. UPS, though, had expressed a desire for an early settlement to avoid any freight diversion to non-union carriers.
 
“The ball is in UPS’s court,” Hall said in March. “If they don’t want shippers to walk away, it’s in their best interest to agree to a fair deal.”

Wolfe Trahan analyst Ed Wolfe wrote in a research note that his firm’s initial sense is that the economic impact to UPS from the deal seems more favorable than past contracts, adding that the relatively early agreement also seems like a near-term positive for UPS and negative for FedEx.

About the Author

John D. Schulz, Contributing Editor and Jeff Berman, Group News Editor

Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Following the integration, the new Hapag-Lloyd will rank among the four largest ocean cargo carriers in the world

AgTC will provide unique market intelligence at next annual meeting in San Francisco this June

With no fuel tax increase likely ahead of this year’s mid-term elections, trucking interests in Washington are moving to Plan B in their attempt to shore up funding for badly needed infrastructure improvements.

Crowley Maritime Corporation has acquired majority ownership of Accord Ship Management (HK) Limited and Accord Marine Management Pvt. Ltd.

To catch a rising economic tide this year, the Port of Long Beach will need to modernize and find new efficiencies to move increasing amounts of cargo at a faster pace, said experts gathered earlier this month for the Port’s 10th annual “Peak Season Forecast” at the Long Beach Convention Center.

Article Topics

News · UPS · Teamsters · Labor · UPS Freight · Small Package · All topics

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2013 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA