Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


USPS looks to move Standard Mail parcels to competitive products category

By Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
August 25, 2010

The United States Postal Service (USPS) recently announced it is petitioning the Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) to move its Standard Mail parcels from its market-dominant product list to its competitive products list.

USPS officials said if this is approved, fulfillment parcels would become a lightweight subcategory of Parcel Select, a package delivery service geared towards large shippers.

This proposal was part of the USPS’s exigent price case to raise rates filed on July 6. This case is comprised of four-to-six percent price increases for various products, including its 18 Market Dominant products. These changes, if approved by the PRC, would take effect on January 2, 2011. The PRC’s decision is due in early October.

The USPS said the strategy for Standard Mail small parcels redesign would eliminate confusion for customers by breaking this category into two significant and distinct customer segments—marketing parcels and fulfillment parcels. And it said the main difference between the two products is weight, with Standard Mail fulfillment parcels weighing less than 1 pound and Parcel Select prices starting at 1 pound.

Standard Mail fulfillment parcels are heavily used by companies like Amazon, FedEx SmartPost, LL Bean, JC Penney, and many other large volume shippers of lightweight parcels.

“This is a competitive market and there are other shippers in the marketplace fulfilling this need for packages,” said USPS Vice President, Shipping Services, Gary Reblin, in a statement. “This is a logical change and customers will no longer have to navigate two different products and rate structures for one business need.

Parcel Research President Doug Caldwell told LM this move makes sense, because Parcel Select, Priority, and Express are already in the USPS’s competitive category.

“USPS previously had proposed a fairly hefty (20% plus) rate increase for Standard Parcels, since these parcels are a money loser for USPS, only covering 75% of costs,” said Caldwell. “Even with the increase, Standard Parcels will still be a comparatively good bargain. For instance, the proposed Standard Parcel rate for a 15.9 ounce package will be just under $1.04, vs $1.60 for a 1 lb Parcel Select.”

In its recently-released recently released fiscal year third quarter earning, USPS said it incurred a net loss of $3.5 billion compared to $2.4 billion for the same timeframe last year, with operating revenue at $16 billion, a $294 million annual decline. Operating expenses—at $19.5 billion—were up $789 million year-over-year. This is the 14th net loss in the last 16 quarters for the USPS, with its fiscal 2010 year-to-date net loss at $5.4 billion compared to $4.7 billion at this point in 2009.
Mail volume for the quarter—at 40.9 billion pieces—was down roughly 700 million pieces of 1.7 percent.

About the Author

Jeff Berman headshot
Jeff Berman
Group News Editor

Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

February manufacturing data issued today by the Institute for Supply Management (ISM) dipped slightly compared to January, according to the most recent edition of the organization’s Manufacturing Report on Business.

As U.S. West Coast ports begin to address their critical congestion issues, an innovative approach is being launched at San Pedro Bay.

The ongoing financial travails of the Highway Trust Fund was made clear in a position paper recently issued by Jeff Davis, senior fellow at the Eno Center for Transportation. In the paper–entitled “Why Not A Ten-Year Surface Transportation Bill?”-Davis points to past federal transportation bills, as well as the White House’s GROW AMERICA proposal as having one fatal flaw in common: they each leave the HTF on worst financial shape after the bill expires than it was prior to the bill being enacted.

Working with research partner, The Economist Intelligence Unit, the IBM Institute for Business Value surveyed 1,023 global procurement executives from 41 countries in North America, Europe and Asia.

U.S. Carloads were down 7.8 percent annually at 259,544, and intermodal volume was off 15.7 percent for the week ending February 21 at 213,617 containers and trailers.

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2015 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA