Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!


USPS takes steps to boost Priority Mail rates

By Jeff Berman, Group News Editor
July 02, 2014

In an effort to grow its Priority Mail offering, the United States Postal Service (USPS) said this week that it has filed notice with the Postal Regulatory Commission to change prices for Priority Mail.

Priority Mail is described by the USPS as its flagship Shipping Services product and represented $6.4 billion in USPS revenue for Fiscal Year 2013

USPS said that these changes would include:
-a reduction in prices on average for businesses and other customers that use USPS’s shipper-focused Commercial Plus and Commercial Base online shipping services;
-include a modest increase for Priority Mail prices at Post offices and other postal retail outlets of roughly 1.7 percent on average;
-Commercial Base and Commercial Plus prices will be reduced on average, with most of the decreases concentrated in the ground zones weighing between 7-16 pounds;
-prices for Commercial Base customers will be reduced on average by 0.9 percent and prices for Commercial Plus customers will be reduced by 2-3 percent on average; and
-these changes would take effect September 7, pending PRC approval if the PRC agrees the prices are consistent with applicable law

“The Postal Service is a vital business partner for small and large businesses and lowering shipping prices will save them money and improve their bottom line,” said Nagisa Manabe, USPS chief marketing/sales officer, in a statement.  “With our affordable shipping options, we hope to attract new business customers and become their preferred delivery service. Unlike others in the shipping industry, the Postal Service is not implementing any new dimensional-weight charges, continuing our commitment to deliver the best value for our customers.”

USPS added that Commercial Base pricing does not have volume requirements, adding that the reduced rates are available for customers using Click-N-Ship, PC Postage products, permit imprints, or digital mailing systems (meters) that generate an Information Based Indica and submit data electronically to the USPS.

This announcement comes at a time when the USPS continues to deal with severe financial issues. In its fiscal second quarter earnings announced in May, the USPS had a net loss of $1.9 billion, representing the 20th loss it has incurred over the last 22 quarters and an operating revenue of $16.7 billion, up $379 billion or 2.3 percent, including the impact of its price change that took effect on January 26.

But despite the loss its Shipping and Package Group’s revenue was up 8 percent, or $252 million, and was driven largely by e-commerce growth, according to USPS officials, as well as revenues for its “last-mile” services, Parcel Return and Parcel Select, which were up 26.4 percent.

The USPS continues to be hindered by its retiree health benefits prefunding payments, which it has been unable to meet, due to a lack of capital. And it will again not be able to make the required $5.7 billion retiree. But USPS CFO and EVP Joseph Corbett said in May there is more to it than simply having legislation reducing the payment, as that does not offer up more money for the USPS to pay down its debt or put more capital into its business.

“Only comprehensive postal legislation that includes a smarter delivery schedule, greater control over our personnel and benefit costs, and more flexibility in pricing and products will provide the necessary cash flows,” said Corbett.

Jerry Hempstead, president of Orlando, Florida-based parcel consultancy Hempstead Consulting, said that these pricing changes will not do nearly enough to stop the financial bleeding for the USPS as in the big scheme of things parcels contribute only a small portion of the operating revenue for the USPS.

“The bleeding comes from congressional mandates imposed upon the USPS that cause undue financial burdens that can’t be solved with a lowering of parcel prices,” he told LM. “It’s naive to think the USPS is just going to elbow UPS and FedEx with a slight rate decrease and expect them to not counter with an even lower price to protect its business. Remember we are not talking retail but volume shippers who have assigned FedEx and UPS reps that are not going to let any business go over a few cents. Discounting is pervasive.”

About the Author

Jeff Berman headshot
Jeff Berman
Group News Editor

Jeff Berman is Group News Editor for Logistics Management, Modern Materials Handling, and Supply Chain Management Review. Jeff works and lives in Cape Elizabeth, Maine, where he covers all aspects of the supply chain, logistics, freight transportation, and materials handling sectors on a daily basis. .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Of special interest to readers of Logistics Management will be “Americas Update,” which will look into the future of the market in the Americas and assess how firms will be able to favorably position themselves to compete and win market share.

After 20 years, two congressional mandates and countless lawsuits and lobbying efforts, safety advocates and the Teamsters union still say there are too many inexperienced rookie truck drivers hitting the road without sufficient behind-the-wheel training.

Congested U.S. port terminals, harbor and over-the-road truck and driver shortages, slower trains and longer rail terminal dwell times due to increased domestic rates have not only disrupted service but also driven intermodal rates and cargo handling costs up sharply.

Southern California shippers are getting a break on container dwell expenses for the next ten days as the Port of Long Beach announced that it had added an extra three days to the time that overseas import containers can remain on the docks without charge.

The long-simmering court battle over whether FedEx Ground’s workers are independent contractors or employees appears headed to the appellate courts—and maybe the U.S. Supreme Court.

Article Topics

News · USPS · Parcel · Priority Mail · All topics

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2013 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA