Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!



West Coast Waterfront Coalition calls for sanity

A major disruption in the San Pedro Bay ports would complicate a situation that is already very difficult to manage for exporters and importers and further threaten the fragile economic recovery underway, they say.
By Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
July 26, 2010

Shippers comprising the Waterfront Coalition are among those stakeholders now urging a quick conclusion of negotiations on a contract for the Office and Clerical Unit in southern California. A major disruption in the San Pedro Bay ports would complicate a situation that is already very difficult to manage for exporters and importers and further threaten the fragile economic recovery underway, they say.

By way of background, the Waterfront Coalition represents manufacturers, retailers, product suppliers and exporters responsible for moving a large share of containerized commerce through marine terminals in southern California.

“The freight our members route through the region helps sustain the longshore labor workforce and employment in affiliated industries, said Robin Lanier, the coalition’s Executive Director. “We support these hard working men and women as they are vital to guarantee that our members’ cargo moves safely, efficiently and as environmentally responsible as possible.”

Yet the coalition maintains that over the past several months, shippers of all varieties are experiencing excessive cargo delays on freight transiting marine terminals in the region. These delays, that also impact intermodal freight moving to rail yards, are contributing to severe service delays resulting in lost delivery guarantees and sometimes lost sales for exporters reaching overseas markets and retailers fulfilling demand in domestic markets. These supply chain problems show no sign of improving and many shippers are considering alternative gateways to move discretionary cargo not destined for the local southern California region.

“A lengthy and contentious negotiation on a contract for the Office and Clerical Unit in southern California has the very real potential to further add to the urgency for shippers to consider alternative North American gateways for discretionary cargo,” said Lanier. “As we have learned from past congestion experiences, a significant share of this cargo never returns to the region.”

 

About the Author

image
Patrick Burnson
Executive Editor

Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Working with research partner, The Economist Intelligence Unit, the IBM Institute for Business Value surveyed 1,023 global procurement executives from 41 countries in North America, Europe and Asia.

U.S. Carloads were down 7.8 percent annually at 259,544, and intermodal volume was off 15.7 percent for the week ending February 21 at 213,617 containers and trailers.

The Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Logistics (BTS) reported this week that U.S. trade with its North America Free Trade Agreement partners Canada and Mexico in December 2014 was up 5.4 percent annually at $95.8 billion. This marks the 11th straight month of annual increases, according to BTS officials.

While the volume decline was steep, there was numerous reasons behind it, including terminal congestion, protracted contract negotiations between the Pacific Maritime Association and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union, and other supply chain-related issues, according to POLA officials.

Truckload rates for the month of January, which measures truckload linehaul rates paid during the month, saw a 7.9 percent annual hike, and intermodal rates dropped 0.3 percent compared to January 2014, which the report pointed out marks the first annual intermodal pricing decline since December 2013.

Article Topics

Blogs · Supply Chain · Railroad · Intermodal · All topics

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2015 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA