Recent Posts
- Work, work, WERC
- China's Business Complexity
- Bulk/Breakbulk Revival?
- Where are my boxes?
- U.S. Exporters: All Dressed Up and No Place to Go?
- Silver lining for nation’s seaports?
- Critical Cargoes: Are West Coast Ports Down For The Count?
- The ILWU: Back to its Marxist Roots
- The Current State of the Maritime Industry: Care To Help With Our Forecast?
- What is Your Risk Threshold?
Recent Comments
- Helen Chen on China's Business Complexity
- PGR88 on The ILWU: Back to its Marxist Roots
- railport on Bulk/Breakbulk Revival?
- Milton on Fixing transport infrastructure: Where’s the leadership?
- Gregory West on Fixing transport infrastructure: Where’s the leadership?
Most Commented On
- If the price is not right, how do you win on service? (6)
- The ILWU: Back to its Marxist Roots (5)
- Fixing transport infrastructure: Where’s the leadership? (3)
- Bulk/Breakbulk Revival? (1)
- China's Business Complexity (1)
Archives
Blog
The ILWU: Back to its Marxist Roots
March 12, 2008
Posted by Patrick Burnson on March 12, 2008 | Comments (5)
In response to: The ILWU: Back to its Marxist Roots
Ross commented:
Dear Dolt, May Day is not, and never has been, the celebration of the birth of communism (is there even such a day and what event might mark it, the publication of Das Kapital?). May Day is actually as American as apple pie. It originated in Chicago in 1886 and marked the kick-off of the campaign for the 8-hour day. And how, may I ask, does the ILWU pay scale demonstrate a lack of solidarity with fellow dock-workers? Only to management does worker solidarity mean cutting your salary and benefits - not that management would ever cut theirs to match their lesser paid brethren around the world. Isn't it truly a wonder that with the advent of the internet and the concomitant access of information that such as Patrick Burnson still trumpet their empty-headed twaddle?
In response to: The ILWU: Back to its Marxist Roots
John Fisher commented:
Each local in the ILWU is entitled to eight hours of work stoppage each month in which to hold their union meeting. This is an agreement between the ILWU and the Pacific Maritime Association. To change any predetermined date for an eight hour work stoppage to hold the monthly union meeting requires at least thirty days notice be given to the PMA. The PMA has accepted the unions request for the entire west coast to hold thier meeting on May first. Before you comment on the actions of the ILWU get your facts straight!!!!
In response to: The ILWU: Back to its Marxist Roots
Ranjan commented:
Thanks Patrick for raising this issue. I agree with you on the issue that our comrades always talk of work stoppage, salary hike, strike at work and so on and never about improving productivity, performance, cost reduction, customer satisfaction, and bringing accountability to the business and society etc. To see this phenomenon in right perspective, we have to keep “May Day” separate, otherwise these comrades will leave the main issue and show emotions about Das Capital, Mao and Lenin. Like any democratically elected leaders, Union leaders too are promoting easy way. Their voters, like any human being wish to get more and more money and comfort at less and less of work and effort; and unfortunately the comrades are promoting that. I am yet to see a truly responsible comrade who can promote “More money for more work, better productivity or result”. I am sure none of you would have seen that either. Have you ever seen an union of comrades running training or re-skilling program where by the members can improve their employability and contribute to nation? Sometimes it appears that their stand is creating hindrances for upcoming business and thus employment opportunity for the locals. Only hope is that the world changes over time. Communism ended in Lenin’s land and will end in Mao’s land. We just need to keep watch that society is not pulled to another extreme and aberration remains, but in different form.
In response to: The ILWU: Back to its Marxist Roots
Kevin commented:
By the way - unfortunately the first two responses above didn't catch your cynical humor - I personally got a light chuckle out of the comparison to socialist states and the ILWU - and the fact of having a paid day to discuss union business. Last I knew, my employer isn't paying me conduct personal business - or should I say conspire against the company in this case - on company time. Like most the working world I either do it on a day off or take a day of vacation. You are correct on your statement (you DO have your facts straight). Unfortunately the ILWU have moved a situation of entitlement, and now the little guy in middle america pays more at the store for ILWU workers to work less and get paid well over $100k/year.
In response to: The ILWU: Back to its Marxist Roots
PGR88 commented:
Communists? No! Mafioso? Yes!







