Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to Logistics Management

The Downside of Lean Logistics

April 27, 2009

Risks related to international transport and logistics have continued to rise in the current economic recession, adding pressure on exporters and importers to set up formal risk management procedures, according to a new research report by Drewry Supply Chain Advisors.

"Lean logistics," is also brought into question.

In a serious recession, the probability of company failures among transport and logistics vendors is heightened, as is the threat of cargo theft, while moving products from offshore locations to final markets continues to create specific business risks, according to the recetnly-published report, “Risk Management in International Transport and Logistics - Key Issues and Best Practices for Senior Management and Logistics Service Buyers."

Drewry believes that the risk of systemic failure of international shipping companies and the consequence of goods seized by creditors while in transit, in particular, should be heeded.

“There is a plethora of strategic and operational risks related to transport and logistics and in the current economic recession those risks are even more pronounced,” said Dr Andrew Traill, policy director of the European Shippers’ Council, who co-authored the Drewry report.

Typical transport and logistics risks include:
• Lack of inventory
• Carrier delays and non-performance
• Transport and logistics cost volatility
• Transport congestion
• New environmental legislation affecting logistics
• Mergers and acquisitions among service providers
• Cargo theft
• Liability for loss or delays
• Bankruptcy of transport provider
• Fines for non-compliance, sometimes running into millions of dollars.

While logistics service buyers and managers in charge of organising transport and distribution have a functional responsibility to manage risks within their department and their area of specialisation, companies also face higher-level risks (corporate governance, compliance with regulations) where responsibility for risks is mandated at senior board level. Yet, in many companies, there are formal procedures to manage some of these risks, but many other risks are not part of any formal risk management policy.

“Drewry argues that international sourcing has introduced in global business more and higher risks related to transport and logistics, and that these risks are often more complex and more significant than in the past but are still misunderstood,” said Philip Damas, director of Drewry Supply Chain Advisors.

“This report advocates a systematic methodology to identifying and assessing the many, varied and growing number of risks that could affect the supply chain and potentially bring a business to its knees,” Dr. Traill said.

In the report, Drewry identifies the risk categories and detailed risks in transport and logistics, provides tools on how to assess risks, and offers proven methods and guidance on how to respond to the different types of risks. The report includes findings from a survey of international shippers about how they rate different risks, ranging from business process risks to terrorism and climate change risks, and some of the discussions of a round-table on risk management organized in 2008. Contrary to many reports and academic studies into supply chain risk management, Drewry’s report does not look specifically at the risks of procuring and sourcing raw materials and finished products, but at the risks involved in purchasing and managing international logistics and transport, and associated risks on availability and control of inventory.

The report attempts to provide guidance on corporate strategic risk issues influenced by transport and logistics, as well as advice on best practices, key performance indicators, contract terms and due diligence tools to help mitigate risks.

For example, the dilemma with lean international supply chains, coupled to lean manufacturing, is that they can become more vulnerable to risk factors. If the supply chain becomes longer (due to outsourcing the supply or manufacture) this vulnerability can increase. Vulnerabilities commonly would include stock-outs when lead times become extended to such a degree that variations in the supply and demand that are unpredicted (perhaps due to deficiencies in the demand and supply forecasts), cannot be accommodated without building into the supply chain some slack – or buffer inventory – which is in itself an anathema to the “lean” ethos. However, the report offers logistics techniques to reduce or cope with demand uncertainty for products shipped across continents.

A major aerospace shipper who attended the Drewry Supply Chain Advisors/Shippers’ Voice round-table on risk management said: “The leaner you are, the bigger the inventory risk.”

 

Posted by Patrick Burnson on April 27, 2009 | Comments (6)

May 19, 2009
In response to: The Downside of Lean Logistics
Bruce commented:

Lean supply chains aren't internationally outsourced. The lean paradigm focuses on (among other things) shortening lead time which doesn't result from internationalizing the supply chain. An internationalized lean supply chain is a paradox.


May 19, 2009
In response to: The Downside of Lean Logistics
Bruce commented:

Lean supply chains aren't internationally outsourced. The lean paradigm focuses on (among other things) shortening lead time which doesn't result from internationalizing the supply chain. An internationalized lean supply chain is a paradox.


May 5, 2009
In response to: The Downside of Lean Logistics
Michel Baudin commented:

As author of a book entitled "


April 29, 2009
In response to: The Downside of Lean Logistics
Aza Badurdeen commented:

This is very interesting analysis. Yes, I agree if you use the lean manufacturing concepts inaccurately, it can lead to more problems than doing any good. People should clearly identify that there are two types of wastes, removable and non removable. While lean systems should focus on eliminating wastes in the first category, it should leave some precautions so that the latter will not affect your business. For an example in this case theft, if happens outside your control you have to keep some provision for that while lack of inventory should be handled internally so that you will get the optimal results from your supply chain This is very interesting analysis. Yes, I agree if you use the lean manufacturing concepts inaccurately, it can lead to more problems than doing any good. People should clearly identify that there are two types of wastes, removable and non removable. While lean systems should focus on eliminating wastes in the first category, it should leave some precautions so that the latter will not affect your business. For an example in this case theft, if happens outside your control you have to keep some provision for that while lack of inventory should be handled internally so that you will get the optimal results from your supply chain www.learnleanblog.com


April 28, 2009
In response to: The Downside of Lean Logistics
Jeff D commented:

Agree with comment. Board room decisions are made and supply chain professionals develop programs based on those parameters to avoid disruption. This article reflects a complete reactionary supply chain. Although that is sometimes the case, proper planning and cooridnation with SC partners should mitigate risks as much as possible.


April 28, 2009
In response to: The Downside of Lean Logistics
A. Pino commented:

It is sad that article writers write challenging titles when they do not have anything interesting to say. The author speaks -superficially, about risk management in logistics and transport due to the present crisis

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
NextGen_OnDemand
Advertisement
Logistics Management NEWSLETTERS
Logistics Preview
This Week in Logistics
Supply Chain & Logistics Tech Briefs
Supply Chain Executive Briefing
Supply Chain Executive Resources



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
© 2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites