Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to Logistics Management

Be Quiet! We’re Watching Theatre of The Absurd

August 6, 2009

Just in case we needed any more evidence about the incompetence of our political leaders, during his speech at a National Press Club luncheon, House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) questioned the point of lawmakers reading the health care bill:  “I love these members, they get up and say, ‘Read the bill,’” said Conyers. “What good is reading the bill if it’s a thousand pages and you don’t have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill?”

 

Unfortunately, Rep. Conyers is hardly alone. He was summing up the prevailing attitude of our elected representatives who have no problem voting on some very significant legislation - without bothering to read it. One group that promotes constitutional government, asked our Representatives and Senators to sign a pledge that they would at least read the health care legislation before voting on it. So far eight out of one hundred Senators, and a small fraction of the Congressional Representatives have signed the pledge. Even though this legislation will increase the deficit by trillions of dollars these politicians cannot take the time or make the effort to understand what they are voting on.

 

The Health Care Bill is arguably one of, if not the most important, pieces of legislation in our lifetime.  Aside from its trillion dollar plus cost, this legislation literally contains provisions that deal with life and death issues. Unlike Rep. Conyers and the rest of his contemporaries, I actually downloaded H.R. 3200, The America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009, and spent a couple of hours reading some of the more controversial sections of this legislation.

 

On pages 425 - 430, you can find information relating to "advance care planning, an explanation by the practitioner of advance directives, including living wills and durable powers of attorney, and their uses, and an explanation by the practitioner of the continuum of end-of-life services and supports available." Some experts believe that with these provisions, euthanasia would be a government sanctioned, or dare I say, mandated provision.  Dr. Jack Kevorkian has found his soul mates in the supporters of this legislation.  

 

What is this legislation really all about? Consider what former Senator Tom Daschle (Obama’s first choice to be Secretary of HWS) said: "Health-care reform will not be pain free. Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them." We need to update the adage that you should be nice to your children because they will pick your nursing home arrangements. If this legislation passes, you will want to be nice to your kids because they may choose whether Mom and Dad lives.   

 

At his news conference on July 22nd, the president touted the savings resulting from this health-care legislation.  Unfortunately, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), weighed in with the following assessment of the potential savings for health-care:  "In CBO’s judgment, the probability is high that no savings would be realized."  And we haven’t even discussed that with this legislation, rationing will be a fact of life because you will be adding millions of new people to the insurance pools without improving the medical system infrastructure, specifically, the number of doctors, health-care professionals, and physical assets such as hospitals.

 

Over the next couple of weeks our legislators will be in their districts. Based on how some of the Town Hall Meetings are going, it appears that some citizens are voicing their concerns with this legislation.  Wouldn’t it be great if more voters turned out for these meetings and demanded that their Representatives actually read the Bills before voting?  Perhaps the actors (a.k.a. the political leadership) will understand that we can’t afford the Theatre of the Absurd.

TranzAct Technologies, Inc.

Posted by Michael Regan on August 6, 2009 | Comments (8)

August 28, 2009
In response to: Be Quiet! We’re Watching Theatre of The Absurd
MR commented:

Robert: Thanks for your comments. For the record, I downloaded the Bill (HR3200) and spent several hours reviewing the language in the more controversial sections. Since it is obvious that facts won't change your opinions, let me ask you three questions. If you add millions of participants to an already over burdened health care system but do not expand the infrastructure (e.g. hospitals and supply of doctors) how do you avoid more extreme rationing? Second, if, and this is a big if, our leaders were serious about health care reform, why wouldn't they include provisions for tort reform since defensive medicine is a significant cost driver in health care? Third, when you look at the Post Office, or the fact that Social Security is going broke, or that Medicaid is one massive unfunded entitlement program, can you tell me why you or anyone else should have any confidence in the ability of our government to take over and run 1/6th of our economy? After all, the President himself noted that the Post Office has huge problems. Why don't we let them figure out how to deliver letters on a breakeven basis, before we turn over the keys to our health care system. Hope you feel better.


August 23, 2009
In response to: Be Quiet! We’re Watching Theatre of The Absurd
Mike commented:

Robert: Thanks for your comments. For the record, I downloaded the Bill (HR3200) and spent several hours reviewing the language in the more controversial sections. Since it is obvious that facts won't change your opinions, let me ask you three questions. If you add millions of participants to an already over burdened health care system but do not expand the infrastructure (e.g. hospitals and supply of doctors) how do you avoid more extreme rationing? Second, if, and this is a big if, our leaders were serious about health care reform, why wouldn't they include provisions for tort reform since defensive medicine is a significant cost driver in health care? Third, when you look at the Post Office, or the fact that Social Security is going broke, or that Medicaid is one massive unfunded entitlement program, can you tell me why you or anyone else should have any confidence in the ability of our government to take over and run 1/6th of our economy? After all, the President himself noted that the Post Office has huge problems. Why don't we let them figure out how to deliver letters on a breakeven basis, before we turn over the keys to our health care system. After you answer those three questions, then perhaps you can take a stab at why taxpayers should be funding elective abortions (before you attack me on this point refer to the Capps Amendment)? Hope you feel better.


August 22, 2009
In response to: Be Quiet! We’re Watching Theatre of The Absurd
Robert commented:

You are wrong. You have not read any part of the bill. I was watching CSPAN when they agreed to the ammendment for living wills and counseling and it was introduced by a republican. The ammendment only establishes legislation to handle counseling for living wills, which is something we should all have anyway. For over a decade the hospitals have offered this counseling and the forms to put your life choices together before they put you under. Most people just blow it off and leave the survivor to make the choice. So there is no kervorkian deal here. With regard to rationing. Have you used your insurance lately? Do you know how badly hospitals ripoff the insurance companies. A week ago I did not realize it but I had a bad anxiety attack. The ER went right for all the heart treatments and tests and 24 hours later told me nothing was wrong with my heart. I checked myself out and got away from those idiots. They never did give me anything to calm me down. If I had been counseled by a doctor he may have picked up on the anxiety thing and just given me a tranquilizer and sent me home. Instead they scored thousands of dollars in testing and got their 10000 dollar night by dumping me in a room. Out of over 24 hours I spent less than 10 min with a doctor and the underpaid staff acted like I was a bother. You need to use your insurance and visit a hospital where all they do is blame the insurance companies for not allowing them to do every expensive test they can think up. You are just parroting mainstream media. Get really sick once and then tell me how you feel about our wonderful free market health care system. The people who are sick and use thier insurance and have to fight over every claim and pay $40.00 copays for a 4 min doctor visit welcome cheaper premiums and the peace of mind that their insurance cannot be dropped if the payment is 2 seconds late. Read the bill. I will bet that you have never read an insurance policy.


August 12, 2009
In response to: Be Quiet! We’re Watching Theatre of The Absurd
Mandi Elliott commented:

What makes me the most upset, is that our "Legislative Leaders" don't see the issue about: of course, I'm not reading the bill. They haven't even thought about how ludicrous they sound, when they say that outloud. Scary isn't it that THESE people are supposed to be representing "The People's" best interest? Well, I am one of "The People" and I object.


August 10, 2009
In response to: Be Quiet! We’re Watching Theatre of The Absurd
G. James commented:

A very good Doctor friend of mine has read the bill and has offered these addition obamanations that HR 3200 would mandate: Pg.425 every medicare patient MUST agree to "end-of-life counseling" every five years. The suggested "choices" include assisted suicide and euthanasia. Pg.29 specifies a $5,000 annual deductible for an individual, $10,000 for a family (how does this compare with what you now have?) Pg.30 a government committee will decide what treatments and benefits you get. And there is NO appeals process as currently with private insurance plans. Pg.42 the Obama-appointed czar "Health Choices Commissioner" will decide health benefits for you. You will have no choice. None. Pg.50 all non-US citizens, illegal or not, will be provided with free healthcare services paid for by - you guessed it 'we the people'. You think we have an illegal immigrant problem now - just wait till word gets out on this. Pg.59 the federal government will have direct, real-time access to all individual bank accounts for electronic funds transfer. Pg.170 non-resident aliens are exempt from individual taxes (Americans will pay for them.) I read over this, and I think that is what the cryptic language means. Pg.195 officers and employees of Government Healthcare Bureaucracy will have access to ALL American financial and personal records. And last but certainly not least - -abortions would be freely available and paid for by the Government (wait no - we the people.) HR 3200 will create an abortion clinic mandate. It will require plans that use a provider network to ensure the “adequacy of such network” so enrollees have access to the services covered. Once abortion becomes a federally mandated “essential benefit,” networks will need to take steps, including establishing new abortion sites in the service.


August 9, 2009
In response to: Be Quiet! We’re Watching Theatre of The Absurd
Mike commented:

For Mike or others who choose to get the Wahsington Post's view on this matter, please check out this link: WWW.WASHINGTONPOST.COM/WP-DYN/CONTENT/ARTICLE/2009/08/07/AR2009080703043.HTML It appears that anyone who oppposes this legislation is immediately grouped with Rush Limbaugh. Certainly, the Washington Post would be at the opposite end of the spectrum. I happen to agree with their position on the end of life issue.


August 9, 2009
In response to: Be Quiet! We’re Watching Theatre of The Absurd
Mike commented:

Thanks for your thoughtful response. I also read the info posted at the link. Unfortunately, when you read HR3200 (pages 425-430)you will see that this is the first time that it has been explicitly spelled out in Federal legislation. Coupled with the comments/thoughts of other thought leaders such as Tom Daschle or Ezekiel Emanuel, a noted bioethicist, who is advising the Obama administration on health care reform,there are those who are concerned that in an environment where rationing is a fact of life, those who have lived a "full life" will be on the short end of the stick. I appreciate your input.


August 8, 2009
In response to: Be Quiet! We’re Watching Theatre of The Absurd
Mike Licht commented:

In 2003, under G.W. Bush, the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality published a report recommending Advance Care Planning, with detailed guidelines for practitioners. Nobody called that euthanasia. Advance Care Planning is legal in almost every state; the bill in question merely allows health care providers to be paid by Medicare for counseling patients on this matter, should the patient request this service - it would not be mandatory. See: notionscapital.wordpress.com/2009/08/07/obama-wants-to-kill-your-grandma/

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
Logistics Management NEWSLETTERS
Logistics Preview
This Week in Logistics
Supply Chain & Logistics Tech Briefs
This Week in Supply Chain
Supply Chain Executive Briefing



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
© 2010 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy