Be Quiet! We’re Watching Theatre of The Absurd
Just in case we needed any more evidence about the incompetence of our political leaders, during his speech at a National Press Club luncheon, House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) questioned the point of lawmakers reading the health care bill: “I love these members, they get up and say, ‘Read the bill,’” said Conyers. “What good is reading the bill if it’s a thousand pages and you don’t have two days and two lawyers to find out what it means after you read the bill?”
Unfortunately, Rep. Conyers is hardly alone. He was summing up the prevailing attitude of our elected representatives who have no problem voting on some very significant legislation - without bothering to read it. One group that promotes constitutional government, asked our Representatives and Senators to sign a pledge that they would at least read the health care legislation before voting on it. So far eight out of one hundred Senators, and a small fraction of the Congressional Representatives have signed the pledge. Even though this legislation will increase the deficit by trillions of dollars these politicians cannot take the time or make the effort to understand what they are voting on.
The Health Care Bill is arguably one of, if not the most important, pieces of legislation in our lifetime. Aside from its trillion dollar plus cost, this legislation literally contains provisions that deal with life and death issues. Unlike Rep. Conyers and the rest of his contemporaries, I actually downloaded H.R. 3200, The America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009, and spent a couple of hours reading some of the more controversial sections of this legislation.
On pages 425 - 430, you can find information relating to "advance care planning, an explanation by the practitioner of advance directives, including living wills and durable powers of attorney, and their uses, and an explanation by the practitioner of the continuum of end-of-life services and supports available." Some experts believe that with these provisions, euthanasia would be a government sanctioned, or dare I say, mandated provision. Dr. Jack Kevorkian has found his soul mates in the supporters of this legislation.
What is this legislation really all about? Consider what former Senator Tom Daschle (Obama’s first choice to be Secretary of HWS) said: "Health-care reform will not be pain free. Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them." We need to update the adage that you should be nice to your children because they will pick your nursing home arrangements. If this legislation passes, you will want to be nice to your kids because they may choose whether Mom and Dad lives.
At his news conference on July 22nd, the president touted the savings resulting from this health-care legislation. Unfortunately, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), weighed in with the following assessment of the potential savings for health-care: "In CBO’s judgment, the probability is high that no savings would be realized." And we haven’t even discussed that with this legislation, rationing will be a fact of life because you will be adding millions of new people to the insurance pools without improving the medical system infrastructure, specifically, the number of doctors, health-care professionals, and physical assets such as hospitals.
Over the next couple of weeks our legislators will be in their districts. Based on how some of the Town Hall Meetings are going, it appears that some citizens are voicing their concerns with this legislation. Wouldn’t it be great if more voters turned out for these meetings and demanded that their Representatives actually read the Bills before voting? Perhaps the actors (a.k.a. the political leadership) will understand that we can’t afford the Theatre of the Absurd.
MR commented:
Mike commented:
Robert commented:
Mandi Elliott commented:
G. James commented:
Mike commented:
Mike commented:
Mike Licht commented:






















