Log In   |  Register Free Newsletter Subscription
Skip navigation
Zibb
Subscribe to Logistics Management

In Obamaland All You Need Is The Willing Suspension Of Disbelief ….

June 19, 2009

In September 2007, when Senator Clinton was questioning General Petraeus about the war in Iraq, she commented that his report on Iraq required "a willing suspension of disbelief." Little did we know that what she was really doing was giving the nation a “heads up” on what we need to understand what is currently happening in Washington DC.

How else can one explain the spectacle of hearing our President tell us that he now supports PAYGO (pay-as-you-go rule) budgeting . Under PAYGO, new spending or tax changes can not add to the federal deficit. According to Wikipedia, “new proposals must either be ‘budget neutral’ or offset with savings derived from existing funds. The goal of this is to require those in control of the budget to engage in the diligence of prioritizing expenses and exercising fiscal restraint.”

According to our President, “Congress can only spend money if it saves money elsewhere. Entitlement increases and tax cuts need to be paid for because borrowing to finance them is not a sustainable long term policy.” And, my personal favorite “paying for what you spend is basic common sense.”

Listening, I was thinking: This is like hearing a lady of the evening suddenly extolling the virtues of virginity. If you’re outraged by this comment, consider some (inconvenient) facts. Within sixty days of ascending to power, the Congress and the President passed a Stimulus Bill, and a Supplemental Appropriation in excess of One Trillion Dollars (actually about 1.2 Trillion Dollars). Then the President submitted a Federal Budget in excess of 3.5 Trillion Dollars, with annual deficits in excess of One Trillion Dollars for years to come. And when you factor in that this new found fiscal discipline does not apply to discretionary spending, or about 40% of the federal budget, you can only conclude that neither the President nor the Congress has even a remote interest in “paying for what you spend.”

Beyond the spending issues, there is the job situation. This Administration loves to talk about the number of jobs that have been saved. Never mind the fact that this is the first time we are hearing about a “saved job” statistic, and that it is impossible to validate this statistic. What is important to note is that at the beginning of January, 134.3 million people were employed; at the start of May, 132.4 million Americans were working. That sure looks like a net loss 1.9 million jobs, instead of an increase of 150,000 “saved” jobs? We were told that unless the stimulus bill passed unemployment would go over 8%; today the unemployment rate (even with the passed stimulus bill) stands at about 9.4%.  Does anyone bother to check these facts before making speeches?

Now the President tells us that the proposed new health care programs will not cost the taxpayers a dime even though the Senate estimates that  the price of these health care “fixes” at 1.6 Trillion Dollars over the next ten years. That is why you need to have a “willing suspension of disbelief” (where a speaker creates a fantastic tale with human interest and a semblance of truth in order to get individuals to suspend judgment concerning the implausibility of the tale), to understand our leaders.

Folks, these are not Donkeys or Elephants issues; frankly, it makes no difference if you’re a Republican or Democrat. What does matter is that citizens check the facts after hearing all these great speeches. And since the traditional media sources such as the newspapers and major TV networks apparently have no interest in checking the facts, you’re going to have to do it for yourself and ask the important questions.

For example, will annual deficits in excess of One Trillion Dollars have an impact on our country or our standard of living in the future? As one pretty smart economist noted: “No one has repealed the law of gravity.” What he was really saying is that actions have consequences. Government stimulus during a recession is important, but we have gone way beyond stimulus. Our government has taken over major financial institutions, two auto companies, and if they have their wishes, they will dictate the quality of health care in this country for years to come. Is this what “hope and change” is all about?  

Let me close with a challenge to our readers: You have a choice to make. When your kids and/or grandkids ask you what you did, or where you were when this great nation mortgaged its future for generations to come, how will you respond? Will you tell them that you sat on the sidelines while the game was being played because you were too busy or perhaps you just didn’t care?. Or will you be able to say that you stood up, made your voice heard, and did every thing you possibly could to pass on to them a brighter future? It is a decision that only you can make.

Taking the first step to get in the game is simple. Call your Senators and Congress person and telling them to stop mortgaging and giving away our future.  

TranzAct Technologies, Inc.

Posted by Michael Regan on June 19, 2009 | Comments (9)

July 2, 2009
In response to: In Obamaland All You Need Is The Willing Suspension Of Disbelief ….
Mike commented:

Since you have previously cited Wikipedia, thought you might find this interesting: Per Wikidedia: "The Vietnam War was a military conflict that occurred in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia from 1959[1] to 30 April 1975." Kennedy began his Presidency on January 20, 1961. Second, Kennedy, not the Congress proposed the tax cuts in 1962. So the statement is factually correct and acknowledged as such by experts: He cut taxes while this country was engaged in Vietnam. Does this address your "baffling" comment? Finally Jim, space precludes giving you the actual budget numbers or how the Federal Budget process works, but feel free to google "Federal Budget" and check the tables. The Republicans did an awful job of controlling expenditures; the Democrats have been even worse. And these are not my facts; they are a matter of public record - even for us non Harvard tpes. Frankly, Jim, I am shocked and embarassed on your behalf by your inability to deal with reality.


July 2, 2009
In response to: In Obamaland All You Need Is The Willing Suspension Of Disbelief ….
Jim commented:

Hmm. So Kennedy cut taxes (even though you claim that it's Congress that's to blame for Bush and or Obama's deficits) and BTW Kennedy was killed in the fall of 1963 and the Gulf of Tonkin incident was in August of 1964. So how he managed to cut taxes during the US involvement in Vietnam is really baffling. Of course you always have seemed to prefer your own "facts" to reality Mike.


July 2, 2009
In response to: In Obamaland All You Need Is The Willing Suspension Of Disbelief ….
Mike commented:

Jim: I always enjoy reading responses to the Blog. What really amuses me is when someone who is oblivious to the facts weighs in with an opinion. For the record, Federal tax receipts increased by almost 800 Billion between when Bush enacted the tax cuts in 2002 and 2006, which is when the Dems took back the House. Not that you would care, but Congress controls the purse strings. With respect to cutting taxes during a war, Kennedy did just that as the Vietnam War was ramping up. In addition to the 775 Billion stimulus, there was the 400 Billion supplemental appropriation and the 275 Billion Mortgage Bailout - and we are just 6 months in to the reign of Barack. Finally, I love the Dems and people like you who screamed about a 400 Billion deficit but are now silent with an annual deficit projected to be almost 2 Trillion Dollars. Jim, in short, you're a fool. If you want to debate you should get the facts. OOOPS! That would mean you would have to look at things objectively.


July 1, 2009
In response to: In Obamaland All You Need Is The Willing Suspension Of Disbelief ….
Jim S. commented:

Rich, the total cost of the Iraq war (including net present value of future expenditures like disability payments to injured soldiers) is in excess of 1.2 Trillion dollars. And it's the only time in US history that a war has been fought while taxes were CUT!


July 1, 2009
In response to: In Obamaland All You Need Is The Willing Suspension Of Disbelief ….
Rich commented:

Hey Jim S...can you shed light on when exactly "W" proposed an $800b economic spendulous? Or to take over the financial industry, automotive industry, healthcare industry, etc? When you answer that, then can you also shed additional light on when exactly "O" owns this mess we're in? I know, always someone else to blame besides "O". 1.20.2012 can't come soon enough.


June 30, 2009
In response to: In Obamaland All You Need Is The Willing Suspension Of Disbelief ….
Jim S. commented:

Gee Mike, where were you when W was spending federal dollars like a drunken sailor, AND slashing tax revenues to boot. I'm afraid that your perception is (as usual) way out of whack. But then again you really only get your ideas by listening to Rush Limbaugh so I suppose I shouldn't be surprised.


June 26, 2009
In response to: In Obamaland All You Need Is The Willing Suspension Of Disbelief ….
Mike commented:

I could have not said it any better. Thanks for the comment


June 24, 2009
In response to: In Obamaland All You Need Is The Willing Suspension Of Disbelief ….
R Steve commented:

What I don't understand why we call it economic stimulus to have the government take or borrow money from people to spend it on government "shovel ready projects" but, it is not good stimulus to let people keep their money to spend it on cars, mortgages, retail goods, healthcare or education. It is not like some of these businesses couldn't use the income in order to create more value and employ more people to pay for the mess the government causes. The government is causing the very problem that they claim to be trying to fix. Government run healthcare. Please, please no. As soon as our government can demonstrate that they run anything well then I will start to listen. The only thing the government does well is find ways to pay back the special interests that pay for their elections. Look at the line for the handouts from the current administration---- unions, Acorn,Eco-radicals and the list is longer than this blog. Pay as you go is the right strategy but, we have seen that words from politicians, especially the one in charge today are used for sound bites to get elected or to craft an image and not for real change.


June 24, 2009
In response to: In Obamaland All You Need Is The Willing Suspension Of Disbelief ….
lfod commented:

You've hit another home run of a post. Government-run health care? Name one thing the government is involved with that runs with any sense of efficiency or success? Keep up the encouragement of contacting our representatives in DC and you are a voice of reason in an era of desperate language from this President.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
NextGen_OnDemand
Advertisement
Logistics Management NEWSLETTERS
Logistics Preview
This Week in Logistics
Supply Chain & Logistics Tech Briefs
Supply Chain Executive Briefing
Supply Chain Executive Resources



Please read our Privacy Policy

About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscription   |   RSS
© 2009 Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Please visit these other Reed Business sites