AAPA explores new ways of funding

Last week’s biennial Port Administration and Legal Issues Seminar in San Francisco featured an in-depth discussion on port funding and public finance management. And while many paths can be taken toward achieving a financing goal, most speakers advised a “go slow” approach.
By Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
April 18, 2011 - LM Editorial

As all of our nation’s major ocean cargo gateways attempt to expand their footprints and compete with enhanced infrastructure, finding the money for many such projects continues to be a daunting challenge.

Last week’s biennial Port Administration and Legal Issues Seminar in San Francisco (sponsored by the American Association of Port Authorities) featured an in-depth discussion on port funding and public finance management. And while many paths can be taken toward achieving a financing goal, most speakers advised a “go slow” approach.

“It is crucial that one set priorities with all the port stakeholders before moving forward,” said Karl Pan, chief financial officer for the Port of Los Angeles. “Before getting started, make sure you understand the risks and whether you are staffed with the administrative skill sets to the get the job done.”

According to Pan, interest costs are not the only concern ports should have when borrowing money. There are debt service reserve fees; financial covenants; and unique reporting requirements.

“So when you are trying to sell your plan to a Board,” he said, “it’s important to avoid financial jargon.” Pan also insisted that complete transparency be provided in any presentation, as “there is no place to hide.”

Given the economies of scale that most ports are now under, financial advisors are “a must,” said Pan.

“We must always remember that advisors are in this business for one main reason – to make money. But because our ports are so sorely stretched thin, they are absolutely essential,” he said.

Jessica Soltz Rudd, senior director with Frasca & Associates, LLC, concurred, noting that advisors can help ports navigate the intricacies of the financial marketplace.

“Back in the ‘go-go nineties’ ports were bringing in so much cargo that money for expansion was a given,” she said. “The growth multiples were three times or more each year, and given the capital intensive nature of port operations, money was not that hard to raise.”

But in the wake of a severe recession, and with consumer confidence now just beginning to gain traction, ports are under pressure to justify investment before trying to raise money.

“Even with a bond rating like LA’s – ‘triple A’ with Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch – it’s not an easy thing to do,” said Sotlz Rudd. “And once you get the funding, it’s important to stay on your guard, and remain proactive. You are only as good as your credit.”

Fro related articles click here.

 

 

 



About the Author

image
Patrick Burnson
Executive Editor

Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

In this webcast we'll explore how successful companies use strategies such as cross-client load consolidation, zone skipping, pooling, etc. to minimize freight cost. You’ll hear how transportation optimization is used to generate cost savings and where the ROI comes from.

Even with expected import cargo volume declines in the coming months, the Port Tracker report by the National Retail Federation (NRF) and maritime consultancy Hackett Associates expects volumes to be up for the first half of 2016.

USPS pointed to ongoing growth in its Shipping and Package Group, whose primary offerings are comprised of Priority Mail, Express Mail, Parcel Select and Parcel Return services, as the key driver for the quarterly revenue gains.

With a 2.3 cent decline to $2.008 per gallon, this week’s price stands as the lowest national average going back to the week of March 16, 2009, when it checked in at $2.017.

A recent Wall Street Journal report stated that third-party logistics and freight transportation services provider XPO Logistics shut down seven freight terminals that were part of the Con-way Inc. less-than-truckload (LTL) network, Con-way Freight. Con-way was acquired by XPO for $3 billion last year.

About the Author

Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review. Patrick covers international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. Contact Patrick Burnson

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2016 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA