Ballot proposition may weaken Port of Long Beach cargo operations

According to spokesmen representing broad coalition of shipping interests, the proposed measure in Long Beach threatens local jobs and will make it more difficult for the Port of Long Beach to remain a leading ocean cargo gateway.
By Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
October 20, 2010 - LM Editorial

Leaders from Southern California’s goods movement industry today announced their unanimous opposition to Measure D.

According to spokesmen representing broad coalition of shipping interests, the proposed measure in Long Beach threatens local jobs and will make it more difficult for the Port of Long Beach to remain a leading ocean cargo gateway.

Measure D, which is on the Long Beach November 2 ballot, is a proposed city of Long Beach Charter Amendment that would change the formula for how revenues from the Harbor Department are transferred to the Tidelands Operating Funds (from 10 percent of net income to 5 percent of gross operating revenues). This amendment states that the management of the city’s oil properties and subsidence control operations are under the exclusive control of the Long Beach City Council rather than the Harbor Commission.

“Measure D is just a bad idea,” said Dan Meylor, President, Los Angeles Customs Brokers and Freight Forwarders Association. “City politicians put it on the ballot without thinking about the negative impact on the local economy, jobs, or important projects ensuring clean air in the Long Beach Community. It will likely affect the port’s bond ratings and associated borrowing costs, driving up the cost of every project and program and
reducing the number of these that can be accomplished, which in turn will drive discretionary cargo to other ports in the United States.”
Which may already be happening, noted Luciana Suran, and economist with CB Richard Ellis Econometric Advisors. Speaking at the 2010 Supply Chain Council Executive Summit in Houston last week, she noted that the anticipated widening of the Panama Canal will impact Southern California.

“We see shippers exploring other all-water options,” she said. “While the sheer sized of the California market is impressive, it must still be managed for growth.”

William Lyte, past president of the Harbor Association of Industry and Commerce, agrees:

“Measure D could put a halt to the continued economic viability of the port. Failing to invest in the port only puts us at a greater disadvantage in the years to come.”

Sue Dvonch, vice president, Propeller Club of Los Angeles-Long Beach, observed that all of California may be hurt by Measure D.

“Those involved in international commerce play a vital and important role in our state’s economic structure,” she said. “They are concerned that Measure D will threaten California’s position as a leading global gateway and will negatively impact our economy should we fail to adequately invest in our state’s transportation infrastructure.”



About the Author

image
Patrick Burnson
Executive Editor

Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Last week, the United States Department of Transportation took further steps to address various issues identified in recent train accidents involving crude oil and ethanol shipped by rail. The announcement was made by DOT with other DOT agencies, including the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).

Logistics Management Group News Editor Jeff Berman had an opportunity to interview Derek Leathers, President and Chief Operating Officer of Werner Enterprises, at this month's NASSTRAC Shippers Conference and Transportation Expo in Orlando. They discussed various aspects of the truckload market, including prices, fuel, and regulations.

During this webcast our presenters will apply the findings of the 23rd Annual Trends & Issues in Transportation and Logistics Study to the world of shipper-carrier decision making. They'll examine the primary aspects that will influence the future direction for shipper-carrier decision-making.

For February, the month for which most recent data is available, the SCI dropped to -1.0 from January’s 2.6, with FTR explaining that the short term positive impact from one-time adjustments for rapidly dropping diesel prices and the suspension of the 2013 motor carriers hours-of-service expires later this year.

Seasonally-adjusted (SA) for-hire truck tonnage in March was up 1.1 percent on the heels of a revised 2.8 percent (from 3.1 percent) February decline, with the SA index at 133.5 (2000=100). This is off 0.3 percent from the all-time high for the SA of 135.8 from January 2015 and is up 5 percent annually.

About the Author

Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review. Patrick covers international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. Contact Patrick Burnson

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2015 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA