Closing the supply chain loop remains a priority for multinationals

“Closing the Loop: Minimizing Product Life-Cycle Impacts” also featured a discussion of emerging life-cycle assessment standards and who they quantify environmental impacts across the value chain.
By Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
November 09, 2010 - SCMR Editorial

How can a company reduce impacts along the product life cycle, and what value chain strategies can be implemented to make this happen? This vexing question and several others were addressed by a panel convened for the BSR conference in New York last week.

“Closing the Loop: Minimizing Product Life-Cycle Impacts” also featured a discussion of emerging life-cycle assessment standards and who they quantify environmental impacts across the value chain.

“But how can we effectively apply these standards?” asked Paul Holdredge, product stewardship program manager for GE Healthcare.

For answer for his company, he said, was to create a “design for the environment compliance” program as an entry point.

“From there,” he added, “we took a look across other industries for sustainable examples. Herman Miller was doing remarkable things, and we drew from that model, too. Then we went within, and used our own resources.”

For Tom Polton, lead, environmental sustainability for Pfizer, closing the loop began by contacting BSR for a “materiality assessment” tool.

“Product stewardship was the most compelling need for us,” he said. “Then we went to a strong supplier evaluation program.”

Having taken those steps, he added, provided Pfizer with user anecdotes that in turn created a “bench-markable” system.

“Performance with Purpose,” was the goal of PepsiCo International, aid the company’s senior manager for energy and climate change, Robert C. ter Kuile. “Our journey began in 1999 with Frito Lay, and moved up the product chain to Tropicana. We examined everything from that point on, moving beyond just measuring the carbon footprint made by producing these goods.”

He said that new scrutiny was placed on water use and packaging as they began reaching into the supply chain. From there, they developed a “supplier engagement program.”

Joel Tickner, associate professor department of community health and sustainability, University of Massachusetts Lowell, said most U.S. multinationals are responding the EU’s “Reach Directives.”

“It’s a good response, since it comes from private industry rather than government programs,” he said. “And enterprise transforms markets across industry lines. Then we can shift the focus away from the consumer and concentrate on workers in the supply chain.”

And while this BSR session demonstrated how companies have partnered across the value chain, leveraged networks, and reduced impacts by closing the loop on the materials cycle, the overall conclusion may have been summed up by Holdredge: “We are really in a nascent stage.”



About the Author

image
Patrick Burnson
Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

The high-volume warehouse or distribution center that supports B2B, Omni-channel activities, direct-to-consumer shipments, and the Internet of Things all require a flexible and scalable supply chain in order to function at optimal capacity. The problem is that most of today's supply chains are made up of fragmented silos of information that compromise their ability to compete, be responsive to customer demands or seize new business opportunities.

As customers' demands constantly evolve, transportation and logistics (T&L) operations are being put under growing pressure to offer more efficient delivery services, while not compromising on customer service. Using findings from a research survey conducted among transport and logistics managers around the world, this report explores how a combination of mobile technology implementations for mobile workers, and process re-engineering efforts can elevate operations to the next level.

It's a fact - most best-of-breed WMS providers force you to pay every time you require a system change. Uncover five more dirty secrets many warehouse management systems providers don't want you to know. Download the white paper 5 Dirty Secrets of Warehouse Management Systems to discover these hidden truths and gain valuable information on considerations for evaluating WMS vendors.

Not Sure? The Whitepaper "Stay or Switch" Provides the Research Necessary for You to See How Well Your Provider Stacks Up!

Too many companies invest in ERP systems but do not achieve the business benefits they anticipated. Sometimes, the ERP solution never fits the way your people and processes work.

About the Author

Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review. Patrick covers international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. Contact Patrick Burnson

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.