Global Supply Chain disruptions on the rise

The research from 35 countries shows that over 70 percent of organizations recorded at least one supply chain disruption in 2010
By Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
December 06, 2010 - SCMR Editorial

A new survey from the Business Continuity Institute (BCI) has revealed serious levels of supply chain failure. The research from 35 countries shows that over 70 percent of organizations recorded at least one supply chain disruption in 2010.

The survey shows that while awareness of supply chain risks is increasing, many businesses remain exposed to high levels of risk. Sponsored by Zurich Insurance Company, the survey report concludes that outsourcing, in particular in IT and manufacturing, often ultimately reduces cost-benefits through greater exposure to supply chain disruption.

Further findings include:

• Adverse weather was the main cause of disruption around the world, with 53 percent citing it - up from 29 percent last year.
• Unplanned IT and telecommunication outages was the second most likely disruption and the failure of service provision by outsourcers was third, up to 35 percent from 20 percent in 2009. These incidents led to a loss of productivity for over half of businesses.
• The average number of identified supply chain risks in the past 12 months was 5, with some organizations reporting over 52.
• 20 percent admitted they had suffered damage to their brand or reputation as a result of these disruptions.

Lyndon Bird FBCI, Technical Director at the BCI, commented:

“The serious levels of supply chain disruption experienced by organizations around the world, coupled with the wide range of threats, underscores the business case for investment in business continuity management (BCM),” said Lyndon Bird FBCI, Technical Director at the BCI.

“Intelligently applying BCM to time sensitive supply chains is a vital risk mitigation technique and should especially underpin business decisions to extend or optimise supply chains.”

Furthermore, he said, BCM provides “peace of mind” that suppliers will be able to support you when they are faced with a disruption, and that your organization has workable plans in place to deal with and recover faster from supply chain disruption.”

The observations echo those made by analysts interviewed by SCMR.

“There likely won’t be a universal signal indicating that the economy is recovering, so businesses may not know when to adjust their models back to pre-recession levels,” said Dr. Robert P. Hartwig, economist and president of the Insurance Information Institute (III).

Speaking at the Council of Supply Chain Management Professional’s (CSCMP) annual meeting in San Diego earlier this year he noted that businesses often consider the costly consequences of facing a supply chain interruption, without considering the implications regarding risk.

“Having a supply chain that is not sufficiently prepared for increased demand can also present financial and reputational costs,” he said.



About the Author

image
Patrick Burnson
Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

The tired cliché of “Perfect Storm,” is probably lost on East Coast shippers now weathering fierce winter winds and snow, but the expression still has currency on the Pacific Rim.

Owners of corporate fleets and fuel buyers face two dilemmas: a limited supply of cost-effective, low greenhouse-gas fuels, and little information on fuel sustainability impacts across the full production and use value chain.

U.S. Carloads were up 5 percent annually at 294,738, and intermodal at 253,317 containers and trailers was up 3 percent.

When it comes to Congress actually getting its act together on a new long-term federal transportation bill, things remain as status quo as it gets, with the big takeaway being nothing really ever gets done, when it comes to passing a badly overdue and needed bill, rather than these band-aid extensions Congress keeps signing off on.

Truckload and intermodal pricing was up on an annual basis, according to the December edition of the Truckload and Intermodal Cost Indexes from Cass Information Systems and Avondale Partners.

About the Author

Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review. Patrick covers international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. Contact Patrick Burnson

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.