Labor management: Investing in human capital

Without an educated and motivated workforce, labor management systems and tools will take you only so far.
By John M. Hill, Director, St. Onge Company
August 18, 2010 - MMH Editorial

During the past year, the potential of labor and workforce management systems using engineered standards for warehouse productivity improvement has been widely heralded in the press and on the Web. New tools focus on integrating these systems with demand-based planning, scheduling and warehouse management systems (WMS) to improve customer service by better matching the workload to predictable workforce capacity. 

In classic economics, three factors are traditionally cited as being critical to goods-producing enterprises – land (or natural resources), capital (or the means of production) and labor.  Codified by Adam Smith in 1776, Karl Marx referred to them as “the holy trinity” of political economics.  The variable in the equation toughest to manage, of course, has been labor (or as many call it “human capital,” although there is a world of difference between the two terms).  With equivalent “land” and “capital,” why is it that some companies so dramatically outperform others – even when using the latest tools for performance management?  I think that the answer boils down to management’s understanding of the distinction between labor and “human capital” and its willingness to make the investments necessary to turn the former into the latter.

Years ago, I took a summer job as a night shift turret lathe operator in a well-equipped automotive feeder plant.  Paid by the piece and trying to put away enough money for my sophomore year at college, I didn’t need rocket science to figure out how to set up a pair of lathes and nearly double my output.  Within a few weeks, I had three lathes going and was earning twice as much as my peers.  And then, the roof fell in!  As opposed to taking my offer to show them how to set up the line to match my performance, my fellow workers found my Beetle in the parking lot, slashed the tires and sunroof, and smashed the windshield.  The following day, I put on a white shirt and tie and reported to work as the newly appointed assistant supervisor of inventory control – and production numbers returned to status quo levels.

In my example, the company had the land, the capital and the labor, but had not made the investment in education, training and motivation necessary to convert that labor into “human capital”, an asset that differentiates the winners from the also-ran’s.  The point is that tools and systems alone will not get the job done – indeed, they should be enablers that allow an engaged, motivated and well-managed workforce to meet or exceed collaboratively established performance targets. 



About the Author

John M. Hill
Director, St. Onge Company

Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Now that the deal, which had to clear several regulatory hurdles in multiple countries, is official, FedEx executives were able to speak a little bit more freely, albeit being somewhat guarded in regards to certain integration specifics at the same time.

As the July 1st date for complete compliance looms, shippers are seeking help to cope with the mandatory changes instituted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to the Safety of Life at Sea Convention (SOLAS).

As of July 1, only containers with a verified gross mass will be cleared to be loaded onto a ship under the International Maritime Organization’s Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Verified Gross Mass (VGM) amendment. Shippers hoping that the implementation of the ruling will be delayed or deferred are whistling in the dark, say industry analysts.

Amid the many worrisome economic indicators kicking around of late, something along the lines of good news came about this week in the form of United States new home sales data, issued by the United States Department of Commerce this week.

In March, the SCI came in at 0.4, which FTR described as “a near neutral reading” on the heels of four months of more favorable market trends for shippers.

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.