Latin America: Part III

By Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
August 15, 2013 - SCMR Editorial

Editor’s Note: This is the final installment of a three-part feature.

Cathy Roberson, an analyst with the London-based think tank Transport Intelligence, says “ocean is still the key,” for U.S. shippers in Latin America.

“We don’t anticipate a shift to air for many manufacturers doing business there,” she says. “The road network in regions is so bad that shipments by air remain problematic and expensive.”

Like Jean-Paul Rodrigue, she agrees that new entrants in the market will rely heavily on transshipment through Caribbean Triangle. This comprises a mix of hub-and-spoke network configurations as well as interlining between long-distance shipping routes. Furthermore, the advantages gained in terms of network interconnectivity and better use of ship assets outweigh the additional handling costs that transshipment entails.

Michael McDaid, who is charged with marketing, strategic planning & yield analysis, for Sea Star Line, LLC in Miami, notes that U.S. shippers currently doing business in the “triangle” are well poised to enter Latin America when they see opportunities there.

“Shippers already active in the Puerto Rico trade have a platform for going beyond the Caribbean into South America,” he says. “Sea Star
partners with its customers to find mutually beneficial expansion opportunities when possible.”

This type of collaboration is taking place on far larger scale within the framework of the American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA). Kurt Nagle, AAPA president and chief executive officer, says that the recently-concluded 22nd Annual Latin American Congress in Bogota, Columbia, focused on the mutual benefits of developing infrastructure.

“Increasing North-South trade can benefit not only ports, but the economic vitality, job opportunities and quality of life for people throughout the Western Hemisphere,” he says.

Similar to here in the U.S., the challenge for many Latin American ports is in how to be able to advance and fund needed infrastructure development projects, both in terms of port facilities and the connecting infrastructure on the land- and water-side, says Nagle.



About the Author

image
Patrick Burnson
Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

The Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) reported this week that U.S. trade with its North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) partners Canada and Mexico increased 8.2 percent from September 2013 to September 2014 at $102.2 billion.

NS said that the D&H lines it plans to acquire connect with the NS network at Sunbury, Pa. and Binghamton, N.Y. and give NS single-line routes from Chicago and the southeast U.S. to Albany, N.Y., which is in close proximity to NS’ Mechanicville, N.Y.-based intermodal terminal.

This follows a 1.6 cent decrease last week, which was preceded by a 5.4 gain the week before and stands as the first increase going back to the week of June 23, when the weekly average headed up 3.7 cents to $3.919 per gallon.

BNSF said that its 2015 capital expenditures will be allocated towards various areas of its business, including maintenance and expansion of the railroad to meet the expected demand for freight rail service, with 2015 representing the third straight year BNSF has invested a record annual capital expenditures investment.

While the ongoing labor negotiations between the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) and the Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) ostensibly going from bad to worse, following the ILWU’s announcement late last week that it was halting negotiations from November 20 through November 30, a Congressional group last week penned a letter to PMA and ILWU leadership expressing concern over the state of the negotiations.

About the Author

Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review. Patrick covers international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. Contact Patrick Burnson

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.