Moore on Pricing: Checking your ocean rate numbers

By Peter Moore, Supply Chain Practitioner/Adviser
July 01, 2013 - LM Editorial

In last month’s column I focused on the volatility of domestic intermodal rail. I cautioned that shippers should expect pressure in major routes associated with import and export because ocean rates are in turmoil as world markets adjust to new capacity and an uneven economic recovery. 

Ocean and rail are two different modes with different market characteristics. At least in rail you can expect 98 percent plus accuracy in invoicing once you make a deal with a carrier. But even with today’s technological advances, ocean carriers continue to make errors on 10 percent or more of invoices according to Steve Ferreira, CEO of Ocean Audit, a leading ocean freight auditor. 

I recently caught up with the globetrotting Ferreira and asked him what he sees happening right now in the intermodal portion of the ocean market: “While it seems likely that carriers will get some increases, the forecast that we’re predicting is that carrier revenue gains will again be inconsistent.

It seems that there’s no authoritative consensus on how strong the market demand may be. That said, it’s a guessing game on capacity holdbacks.”
Ferreira’s comments are consistent with what we’ve been reporting in Logistics Management and right on with what shipper contacts are telling me. The impact will continue to ripple through all modes in international moves as shippers look at total landed cost (TLC).

The consequence of selective rate hikes and changing capacity is that shippers need to be on their game in monitoring all the players in their major and minor shipping lanes. If you’re a small volume shipper this can be really tough; so, heading advice from fellow shippers in shipper associations and third parties can be very helpful.

On the invoice front, I recently worked with a mid-size shipper who, like many manufacturers, had a logistics and purchasing function negotiating freight and a separate finance function in another physical location processing payment. We quickly learned that complex ocean invoices were being paid with only a review of the math and with little oversight on accessorials and surcharges. 

Ferreira recommends that shippers look to invoice accuracy first to capture freight savings. “One aspect to combat potential rate increases for beneficial cargo owners should be a focus on the accuracy of new invoicing associated with rate increases taken in new contracts,” he says. “One major ocean carrier recently disclosed their invoice accuracy rate at 88 percent; and in most cases, the business team negotiating ocean freight pricing are not the same associates paying the invoices.”

He advises that if you’re taking increases on your ocean freight pricing, it’s best to mitigate them as best possible by ensuring your teams are using enhanced auditing rather than rubber-stamping invoices for payment.

The progress on including multi-component ocean, rail, and truck rates in transportation management systems has been slow. Many ERP-based systems are simply looking for one total landed cost to enter into a single price field. Accounts payable may be simply checking for a value within a range. 

Shippers have historically relied upon third parties to review, adjust, or approve complex invoices. But it’s important that you incorporate an integrated, team approach consisting of those with knowledge of the intent of the contract working along side of those with technical expertise and know the market well. 

In this case, I’ll quote a certain presidential candidate: “It takes a village.” Shippers need to have resources that can negotiate a fair rate, monitor service levels, and, most importantly, pay only the correct charges.



About the Author

Peter Moore
Supply Chain Practitioner/Adviser

Peter Moore is Adjunct Professor of Supply Chain at Georgia College EMBA Program, Program Faculty at the Center for Executive Education at the University of Tennessee, and Adjunct Professor at the University of South Carolina Beaufort. Peter writes from his home in Hilton Head Island, S.C., and can be reached at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Shippers and other ocean cargo carrier stakeholders should be cheering the announcement made today by The U.S. Coast Guard, as it formally notified the International Maritime Organization through a Declaration of Equivalency that the United States position on SOLAS is that there are multiple methods to submit the combined cargo and container weight (Verified Gross Mass or VGM).

The proposed $4.8 billion acquisition of TNT Express N.V. by FedEx took a major step closer to becoming official today, with the company and TNT announcing today that they have received unconditional approval of the offer from the Ministry of Commerce People’s Republic of China (MOCFCOM).

March shipments at 798,180 trailed February by 12 percent and were down 19 percent annually. For the entire first quarter, shipments were relatively flat annually, rising 0.27 percent to 2,587,988.

OCEMA says it has placed a priority on working with other stakeholders to find operational solutions that will help U.S. exporters, carriers, and marine terminals prepare for the implementation of the SOLAS Verified Gross Mass (VGM) rule.

The first quarter is typically the slowest period of freight demand for LTL carriers. With a few notable exceptions, that was reflected in first quarter earnings reports of the major publicly held LTL carriers.

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2016 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA