Other Voices: Using cost to serve analysis to drive flow strategies


October 02, 2012 - MMH Editorial

Editor’s Note: The following column by Francis Tomany, senior director at Manhattan Associates, is part of Modern’s Other Voices column. The series, published on Wednesdays, features ideas, opinions and insights from end users, analysts, systems integraters and OEMs. Click on the link to learn about submitting a column for consideration.

In today’s complex world, supply chain managers have multiple options to get products to customers.  Do I fully leverage my distribution center and stock inventory there for subsequent replenishment to forward DCs or stores?  Do I cross-dock products as they come in?  Or do I bypass my DC altogether and have my supplier directly deliver to forward DCs or stores?  The critical inputs to making these decisions are service level goals/commitments and cost.  But service level and cost are in a natural tension with one another.

As a supply chain manager I have to balance service level with cost and do so in a way that makes my merchants (in a retailer) or sales force (in a wholesaler distributor) just as happy with service levels as my CFO is with my cost containment efforts.  Not an easy task.  It’s not easy because, in truth, the right answer as to which flow strategy to use varies by type of item and even by item itself. 

This is because the characteristics of the different items may drive different types of cost and drive them to varying degrees.  For example, for an item that requires special handling or preparation I have to decide where I can get that work done most cheaply – by the supplier (if I can negotiate that), in my DC or at a store, and that in turn may affect what strategy I pick to flow the item through my supply chain.  Another item may not have special handling/preparation needs and so a different flow strategy may be appropriate for it.  And this problem is growing according to Aberdeen Group, due to a 20% the rise in the use of these multiple distribution strategies in the retail industry alone since 2009.

How then do I determine the cost of each flow strategy so that I can make a decision that meets my service level goals at the lowest cost?  That’s where cost to serve analysis can help.

Cost to serve analysis involves looking at the granular costs that go into acquiring an item from a supplier and transporting, storing and handling it throughout my inbound and outbound supply chains up to the point that the customer takes it off my hands.  These costs can include purchase order cost, ocean freight, import duties, trade finance fees, local drayage, line haul cost to my DC, labor receiving, labor pick, pack and ship, DC overhead, outbound transportation, store receiving labor and inventory carrying cost.  Cost to serve analysis attempts to get to a total cost to serve by identifying and capturing each of these costs, figuring out how to apportion shared costs down to the unit level of each item involved and aggregating the results into useful metrics that drive decision making.  These useful metrics are typically unit cost for an item at a DC, unit cost of an item as delivered to a given customer, unit cost of an item from a particular supplier – and so on.

The challenge with cost to serve analysis is that in order for it to be truly efficient and scalable to all of your items it needs to be an automated process.  And because costs constantly vary what was a good flow strategy for an item at one time may not now be the optimal strategy so your cost to serve analysis needs to be continuously updated.

How do you scale cost to serve analysis and do it on a continuous basis?  First, you need to think about how your supply chain systems capture cost and then you need to feed those costs into a cost apportionment engine for ultimate storage in a data warehouse.  Then you need to think about the types of analysis tools that your supply chain folks would need to analyze the data based on the types of questions they are trying to answer.

The real advantage of implementing a cost to serve process inside your company is that the types of questions it can answer go beyond simply helping pick flow strategies for items.  It can also help your logistics managers pick routes and modes on the inbound side or evaluate whether to go prepaid or collect.  And it can help your DC managers expose what drives their costs so that they can collaborate with merchants or sales to reduce them.  And even beyond the supply chain it can directly help your merchants or sales force determine where to source from and what terms to negotiate with suppliers.  That makes cost to serve analysis strategic for your company.

And that’s pretty cool!



Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Seasonally-adjusted (SA) for-hire truck tonnage in March was up 1.1 percent on the heels of a revised 2.8 percent (from 3.1 percent) February decline, with the SA index at 133.5 (2000=100). This is off 0.3 percent from the all-time high for the SA of 135.8 from January 2015 and is up 5 percent annually.

Intermodal volume was up 8.1 percent annually at 280,016 containers and trailers. This outpaced the week ending April 11 at 270,463 and the week ending April 4 at 271,127. AAR said this tally marks the second highest weekly output it has ever recorded as well as the first time container and trailer traffic was higher than carloads for a one-week period.

Ocean cargo carrier service reliability across the three core East-West trades hit a five-month peak in March with an aggregate on-time performance of 64 percent, according to Carrier Performance Insight, the online schedule reliability tool provided by Drewry Supply Chain Advisors.

The Airforwarders Association, which represents more than 360 companies that move air cargo through the supply chain, today applauded an agreement reached by Congressional leaders to advance legislation giving the President authority to conclude key global trade agreements.

Despite great opportunity for growth, the logistics market in Latin America is lagging behind other emerging markets thanks in part to its notoriety for corruption, violence, poor infrastructure and government bureaucracy.

Article Topics

Blogs · Manhattan Associates · All topics

About the Author

Bob Trebilcock, editorial director, has covered materials handling, technology, logistics and supply chain topics for nearly 30 years. In addition to Supply Chain Management Review, he is also Executive Editor of Modern Materials Handling. A graduate of Bowling Green State University, Trebilcock lives in Keene, NH. He can be reached at 603-357-0484 or email [email protected].

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.