Port of Long Beach addresses drayage concerns at IAPH

For port authorities worldwide, drayage is an ever-present challenge and cost center.
By Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
May 14, 2013 - LM Editorial

Members of the International Association of Ports and Harbors (IAPH) were given an overview of the innovative new developments in shared container chassis last week.

For port authorities worldwide, drayage is an ever-present challenge and cost center.

J. Christopher Lytle, Executive Director Port of Long Beach, was among the speakers on the panel, Development in Trucking Logistics.”

“The question we have in Southern California, and in many other US. Ports is ‘what’s the best most-efficient model for chassis management?’” said Lytle. “Chassis are all alike, but the current ownership system restricts sharing. We’d like to see that changed.”

Lytle noted that Sea-Land, formerly a trucking company, was the first ocean carrier to own chassis. Other players followed, until each carrier had its own fleet.

But this inventory burden created new problems for shipping lines, as they were not able to concentrate on their primary goal: to move freight on the water. To date, there are more than 100,000 chassis at the Port of Long Beach, with 14 container terminals being served by more than 11,000 drayage vehicles. 

“A coalition of stakeholders comprising terminal operators, truckers, railroads, and ocean carriers are trying to address this problem,” said Lytle. “We are all in agreement that this asset-based arrangement is not serving the BCO’s (beneficial cargo owners).”


The solution, he said is the establish a “gray chassis fleet” with 100 percent interoperability…where any chassis works for any transaction.

“This would move chassis storage and upkeep away from the marine terminals, and make a lot more land available for other more productive purposes,” he said. “So far, we getting a lot of valuable input from the chassis community on how to proceed.”
One suggestion, said Lytle, was to create “benchmarking” with existing gray fleets and chassis-leasing companies. As a consequence, the port has issued an RFP for project management services.

“We don’t know yet what kind of skill set will be required for the firm charged with this responsibility,” he said. “But it will certainly require a variety of solutions to solve the problem.”

The questions yet to be addressed include:

*What would a “gray fleet” model for multiple operators look like?
*How would a “gray fleet” be managed, and who would do it?
*Who should own chassis?
*Where should chassis be based?

According to Lytle, many port authorities feel that chassis operations should be moved to centralized yards where they can be both inspected and maintained.

“We are now looking into hiring a facilitator to develop concepts for this,” he said, “and we expect to arrive at a decision by the end of this year.”

Donald B. Snyder is the Director of Trade Development for the Port of Long Beach, told LM in subsequent interview that such a solution would also be “greener.”

“Obviously, there would be fewer truck moves, and that will only contribute to the port’s efforts to have cleaner air,” he said.



About the Author

image
Patrick Burnson
Executive Editor

Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Many companies are turning to Global Trade Management (GTM) as a viable solution to address the complexities associated with international trade. But how do you successfully build a business case for GTM software?

Various media outlets reported this week that UPS will pay $25 million to settle allegations that it filed false claims to the federal government over guarantees it made related to delivery of Next Day air overnight packages.

While the dust continues to settle at West Coast ports after a nine-month labor dispute that saw the two main parties involved–the Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) and the International Longshore & Warehouse Union–reach a tentative labor agreement on February 22, the PMA said yesterday that its members voted to ratify a new contract with the ILWU.

The United States House of Representatives yesterday passed legislation, entitled H.R. 2353, the Highway and Transportation Funding Act of 2015, by a 387-35 margin that extends current law and authorizes surface transportation programs through the end of July.

As the supply chains of high-tech shippers continue to mature and innovate, coupled with rapid growth, it is not a huge surprise to see them further leverage current strategies and lay the groundwork for newer ones, when it comes to further expanding their manufacturing supply chain capabilities. That was a key theme in the fifth Annual UPS Change in the (Supply) Chain (CITC) survey that was rolled out today.

Article Topics

News · Green · Container · Logistics · All topics

About the Author

Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review. Patrick covers international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. Contact Patrick Burnson

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2015 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA