Senate EPW Committee signs off on MAP-21 Reauthorization Act
May 16, 2014 - LM Editorial
Not long after the United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (EPW) this week rolled out its version for new federal transportation authorization, entitled the MAP-21 Reauthorization Act (S. 2322), the bill received the blessing of the EPW committee with an unanimous vote yesterday.
The bill is co-sponsored by Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, Senator David Vitter (R-LA), Ranking Member of the Committee, Senator Tom Carper (D-DE), Chairman of the Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee, and Senator John Barrasso (R-WY), Ranking Member of the Subcommittee.
The MAP-21 Reauthorization Act would fund and improve the country’s highway programs at current funding plus inflation, according to EPW officials. The current version of MAP-21, which is set to expire at the end of September, is a 27-month, $109 billion bill, which took effect in July 2012.
“Today’s passage sends a powerful signal to our colleagues and to our nation that we are serious about addressing the looming funding crisis in the Highway Trust Fund,” Boxer said in a statement. “I am proud of this strong, bipartisan bill that helps provide the certainty that all of our states and cities need to move forward with critical infrastructure and transportation projects. Thanks to all of our Members for their work on this job-creating legislation.”
The timing of the new bill could prove to be key, with MAP-21 set to expire at the end of the fiscal year on September 30 and the Highway Trust Fund expected to be depleted by early August.
The MAP-21 Reauthorization Act calls for long-term funding certainty for state and local governments to support multi-year transportation project investments, as well as increased funding for existing core transportation formula programs to provide states and local governments with a strong federal partner.
On the freight front, which continues to ostensibly gain importance in relevance on the federal transportation front in recent years, there are some notable freight-related provisions within the bill.
One of them, according to the bill’s language, is the establishment of a formula-based freight program, which is based on the program included in the Senate-passed MAP-21 and would provide funds to all states to improve goods movement on key corridors, reduce costs, and improve performance for businesses, as well as:
-expand flexibility for rural and urban areas to designate key freight corridors that match regional goods movement on roads beyond the Primary Freight Highway Network;
-improve efforts to identify projects with a high return on investment through state freight plans and advisory committees established under MAP-21;
-provide new funds to projects of national or regional significance through a competitive grant program;
-provide new provisions to improve the transparency of how and where transportation projects are selected and funded to ensure that stakeholders and the public have faith in the integrity of highway programs and the use of federal tax dollars;
-develop a national freight strategic plan that would provide and assessment of the condition and performance of national freight network and identify highway bottlenecks on the national freight network that create significant freight congestion
-improve upon the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) program and provide state and local governments new options for stretching transportation dollars and increasing efficiency and utilization, among other provisions
“It looks like this bill is building on the streamlining provisions from MAP-21, which is something I would have expected them to do, especially since Senator Vitter and Senator Barrasso are very focused on the regulatory side and speeding up project delivery,” said Janet Kavinoky, executive director of transportation and infrastructure for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. “The National Freight Program in the bill is something Senator Boxer had talked about wanting to build on, with MAP-21 being about trying to lay the foundation to figure out which routes were critical and was all about the designation of the National Highway Freight Network, and now they want to put some resources behind those efforts.”
Kavinoky added that the EPW Committee’s timing for getting the bill out is very good, explaining there is sufficient time to get the authorization side of it done, with the financial challenges in funding the bill still needing to be addressed.
Officials at the Coalition of America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors (CAGTC) endorsed the bill.
CAGTC said that this bill renews the requirement for the U.S. Department of Transportation to develop a National Strategic Freight Plan with new tools and data assessments is beneficial, explaining that since its inception CAGTC has advocated for a freight-specific grant program to award funding through the use of merit-based criteria that identifies and prioritizes projects with a demonstrable contribution to freight efficiency. It explained that freight projects are typically large-scale, frequently multimodal and cross jurisdictional borders, making them difficult to fund through traditional distribution methods such as formula programs
“We look forward to the proposals of the other Congressional committees of jurisdiction that may complement the policy put forth by the EPW Committee in this bill. We commend their commitment to bolstering freight infrastructure through increased investment and strong policy,” said Leslie Blakey, CAGTC President and Executive Director.
Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine
entire logistics operation. Start your FREE subscription today!