Shippers caution against “Hunger Games of the Sea”

By Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
June 23, 2014 - LM Editorial

While U.S. shippers may have been surprised by China’s decision to oppose the P3 Network, there had been rumblings of discontent voiced by their counterparts in Hong Kong for some time.

“Shippers can never be sure whether A P Moller-Maersk, MSC and CMA CGM – the P3 Network carriers – have talked about rates or not,” notes a bulletin issued by the The Hong Kong Shippers Council early last week.

“Shippers are suspicious about whether these shipping lines are just service sharing, or consolidating all the operations,” it adds. “If they have such a big market share, they will easily come up with very unfavorable freight charges; they may even demand double freight rates during the peak seasons.”

According to the association even without “collusion,” freight rates could easily be hiked from the smaller competition pools created by the alliances. Here are two other major points directed to Hong Kong shippers:

*Negative Carrier Alliance Effect on Shippers - Increased Risk



This one is more for larger shippers. Spreading out shipments between different carriers supplies risk mitigation from cargo damage by having their cargo containers on different ships. It’s kind of like the old platitude of not having all your eggs in one basket. 

With alliances sharing ships, this strategy becomes difficult as the two carriers could easily sail the shipments together.


*Negative Carrier Alliance Effect on Shippers - Additional Fears





These fears include transit times increasing use of transhipment hubs, alliances growing to include feeder services like inland rail from hubs, powerful carriers being able to put pressure on terminal operators, and carriers having increased influence on jobs all across the supply chain.

 If the carrier alliances were to move forward as planned, it seemed to Hong Kong shippers that it would be inevitable for smaller carriers to be pushed out of the market.

 They note that the international shipping industry’s freight rates have always been volatile.

Time will tell how all the moves made by the various carriers as they fight for dominance in the “Hunger Games of the Sea,” but there’s plenty of room for speculation now, say shippers in Hong Kong.



About the Author

image
Patrick Burnson
Executive Editor

Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).


Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Now that the deal, which had to clear several regulatory hurdles in multiple countries, is official, FedEx executives were able to speak a little bit more freely, albeit being somewhat guarded in regards to certain integration specifics at the same time.

As the July 1st date for complete compliance looms, shippers are seeking help to cope with the mandatory changes instituted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to the Safety of Life at Sea Convention (SOLAS).

As of July 1, only containers with a verified gross mass will be cleared to be loaded onto a ship under the International Maritime Organization’s Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Verified Gross Mass (VGM) amendment. Shippers hoping that the implementation of the ruling will be delayed or deferred are whistling in the dark, say industry analysts.

Amid the many worrisome economic indicators kicking around of late, something along the lines of good news came about this week in the form of United States new home sales data, issued by the United States Department of Commerce this week.

In March, the SCI came in at 0.4, which FTR described as “a near neutral reading” on the heels of four months of more favorable market trends for shippers.

Article Topics

Blogs · Freight · Container · Shipping · Ocean Carriers · All topics

About the Author

Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at [email protected]

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.


© Copyright 2016 Peerless Media LLC, a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Framingham, MA 01701 USA