Smart working capital management

By Robert A. Rudzki, SCMR Contributing Blogger
April 13, 2011 - SCMR Editorial

As we have discussed in the past, certain working capital improvements should be spearheaded by procurement professionals. Other working capital enhancements deserve the participation by procurement professionals. In the process, you can add real value to your company while demonstrating that you are able to drive strategic value across both cost-related and non-cost dimensions.

Payment terms are a great area for leadership by procurement. But there are some pitfalls to avoid. What I’d like to do today is comment on the temptation to be preoccupied with DPO (days payable outstanding).

Partly driven by their financial office, many procurement departments are pursuing objectives of extending DPO year after year. The objective is typically to better match DPO with DSO. In other words, you’re trying to balance the cash cycle time tied up in accounts receivable (waiting for your customers to pay you), with the cash cycle time contributed by supplier payment terms.

A single-minded focus on DPO extension can, however, be counterproductive. In particular, it can leave untested the willingness of suppliers to entertain aggressive discount payment terms in exchange for early payment by the customer.

In this credit-constrained environment, we have seen numerous examples of suppliers offering aggressive discount terms in order to better manage their own cash flow cycle. If your procurement department is focused solely on extending net payment terms, you’ll never uncover the potential for better discounts. It is better, and more valuable, to obtain the option of paying either discount or NET terms, at your company’s discretion. Then, based on your company’s finances and liquidity objectives, your Treasury department will have the flexibility to pay earlier and earn the discount (which flows directly to your bottom line), or pay on a net basis and hold on to your cash.

If you’re being measured against a simple DPO objective, suggest to the scorekeeper that you report DPO adjusted for discounts taken, and separately report the value added by your negotiation of better discount terms.

For related blog posts click here.

 



About the Author

image
Robert A. Rudzki
SCMR Contributing Blogger
Robert A. Rudzki is a former Fortune 500 Senior Vice President & Chief Procurement Officer, who is now President of Greybeard Advisors LLC, a leading provider of advisory services for procurement transformation, strategic sourcing, and supply chain management. Bob is also the author of several leading business books including the supply management best-seller "Straight to the Bottom Line®", its highly-endorsed sequel "Next Level Supply Management Excellence," and the leadership book "Beat the Odds: Avoid Corporate Death & Build a Resilient Enterprise." You can reach him through his firm's website: http://www.GreybeardAdvisors.com

Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

Last week, the United States Department of Transportation took further steps to address various issues identified in recent train accidents involving crude oil and ethanol shipped by rail. The announcement was made by DOT with other DOT agencies, including the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).

Logistics Management Group News Editor Jeff Berman had an opportunity to interview Derek Leathers, President and Chief Operating Officer of Werner Enterprises, at this month's NASSTRAC Shippers Conference and Transportation Expo in Orlando. They discussed various aspects of the truckload market, including prices, fuel, and regulations.

During this webcast our presenters will apply the findings of the 23rd Annual Trends & Issues in Transportation and Logistics Study to the world of shipper-carrier decision making. They'll examine the primary aspects that will influence the future direction for shipper-carrier decision-making.

For February, the month for which most recent data is available, the SCI dropped to -1.0 from January’s 2.6, with FTR explaining that the short term positive impact from one-time adjustments for rapidly dropping diesel prices and the suspension of the 2013 motor carriers hours-of-service expires later this year.

Seasonally-adjusted (SA) for-hire truck tonnage in March was up 1.1 percent on the heels of a revised 2.8 percent (from 3.1 percent) February decline, with the SA index at 133.5 (2000=100). This is off 0.3 percent from the all-time high for the SA of 135.8 from January 2015 and is up 5 percent annually.

About the Author

Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review. Patrick covers international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. Contact Patrick Burnson

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.