Sustainable procurement practices good for business and society

This is one of many conclusions drawn by supply chain specialists speaking at the BSR conference in New York last week.
By Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
November 10, 2010 - SCMR Editorial

Company sustainability ratings are proliferating as the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) agenda steadily migrates from the margins to the mainstream of capital, procurement, and consumer markets. This is one of many conclusions drawn by supply chain specialists speaking at the BSR conference in New York last week.

“While the advance of sustainability ratings has spawned innovation, questions of rigor, consistency, transparency, and independence appear with increasing frequency, fueled in part by the financial and environmental crises in the last few years,” said Allen White, vice president and senior fellow, Tellus Institute.

As moderator of the panel, “Sustainability Ratings: Time for a Common Framework,” he noted that these developments lead to one key question.

“How can we use ratings to drive continuously higher levels of sustainability performance among companies worldwide?” he asked.

Marcela Manubens, senior vice president, global human rights a social responsibility program, Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, observed that “critical mass” is still an objective.

“There’s been a convergence of social agendas,” she said, “but there remains a need for a closer relationship with consumer practice and corporate behavior. Clearly, we are not there yet.”

Steven Lydenberg, chief investment officer, Domini Social Investments, agreed, but the “competitive culture” of corporations was still an obstacle.

“I’m a great believer in KPIs (Key Performance Indicators),” he said. Right now, there are too many secondary indicators on the societal front, with too many scores. That gives us a false sense of completion, and fails to quantify findings.”

As a consequence, he added, corporations are discouraged from innovating.

Michael Marx, executive director, corporate ethics international, said that no matter how slow the process has been so far, corporations must become more transparent.

“Otherwise,” he said, “they run the risk of having procurement negatively impacted. NGOs, for example, can redirect capital if they can’t see beyond the ‘black box’ some corporations still use in their supply chains.”

Indeed, he said, a movement perspective on ratings will educate consumers and differentiate providers.

“That’s when the interests of NGOs and corporations dovetail, and create a win-win,” said Marx.



About the Author

image
Patrick Burnson
Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review magazines and web sites. Patrick is a widely-published writer and editor who has spent most of his career covering international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. You can reach him directly at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address).

Subscribe to Logistics Management magazine

Subscribe today. It's FREE!
Get timely insider information that you can use to better manage your
entire logistics operation.
Start your FREE subscription today!

Recent Entries

While the economy has seen more than its fair share of ups and downs in recent years, 2014 is different in that it could be the best year from an economic output perspective in the last several years. That outlook was offered up by Rosalyn Wilson, senior business analyst at Parsons, and author of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) Annual State of Logistics Report at last week’s CSCMP Annual Conference in San Antonio.

Matching last week, the average price per gallon of diesel gasoline dropped 2.3 cents, bringing the average price per gallon to $3.755 per gallon, according to the Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration (EIA).

A number of key topics impacting the freight transportation and logistics marketplace were front and center at a panel at the Council of Supply Chain Management Annual Conference in San Antonio last week.

The relationships between third-party logistics (3PL) service providers and shippers are seeing ongoing developments due in large part to the continuing emergence and sophistication of omni-channel retailing. That was one of the key findings of The 19th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study, which was released by consultancy Capgemini Group, Penn State University, and Korn/Ferry International, a global talent advisory firm.

Optimism in the form of increasing profits was a key takeaway in the Annual Survey of Third-Party Logistics (3PL) CEOs, released earlier this week at the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) Annual Conference in San Antonio.

About the Author

Patrick Burnson, Executive Editor
Patrick Burnson is executive editor for Logistics Management and Supply Chain Management Review. Patrick covers international trade, global logistics, and supply chain management. He lives and works in San Francisco, providing readers with a Pacific Rim perspective on industry trends and forecasts. Contact Patrick Burnson

Comments

Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.